From: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, yu.c.chen@intel.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
connoro@google.com, jstultz@google.com, arighi@nvidia.com,
tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com, changwoo@igalia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] sched/numa: Drive NUMA task tick from execution context
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 18:28:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909092901.2989564-3-sh_def@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909092901.2989564-1-sh_def@163.com>
Proxy execution separates the scheduling context in rq->donor from the
execution context in rq->curr. The task tick dispatcher can therefore
invoke task_tick_fair() for either side of a cross-class proxy
relationship.
task_tick_numa() operates on state associated with the task actually
executing, including its mm and NUMA work state. Task-level execution
runtime is likewise accounted to rq->curr, and task_tick_numa() uses that
runtime to drive periodic NUMA scanning.
Split task_tick_fair() into donor and execution-context sections and run
the NUMA tick only when rq->curr belongs to the fair scheduling class. The
donor class tick runs first, so execution runtime is accounted before the
NUMA tick consumes it.
Fixes: 7de9d4f94638 ("sched: Start blocked_on chain processing in find_proxy_task()")
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6f1777799371..a8c7a9a29ace 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -15061,41 +15061,43 @@ static inline void task_tick_core(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) {}
*/
static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, int queued)
{
- struct task_struct *donor = rq->donor;
- struct sched_entity *se;
+ struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr, *donor = rq->donor;
- if (donor->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
- return;
+ if (donor->sched_class == &fair_sched_class) {
+ struct sched_entity *se = &donor->se;
- se = &donor->se;
+ if (se->on_rq) {
+ unsigned long weight = NICE_0_LOAD;
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
- if (se->on_rq) {
- unsigned long weight = NICE_0_LOAD;
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+ for_each_sched_entity(se) {
+ cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ entity_tick(cfs_rq, se, queued);
- for_each_sched_entity(se) {
- cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
- entity_tick(cfs_rq, se, queued);
+ weight = __calc_prop_weight(cfs_rq, se, weight);
+ }
- weight = __calc_prop_weight(cfs_rq, se, weight);
+ se = &donor->se;
+ reweight_eevdf(cfs_rq, se, weight, se->on_rq);
}
-
- se = &donor->se;
- reweight_eevdf(cfs_rq, se, weight, se->on_rq);
}
if (queued)
return;
- if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_numa_balancing))
- task_tick_numa(rq, donor);
+ /* Update state owned by the execution context. */
+ if (curr->sched_class == &fair_sched_class &&
+ static_branch_unlikely(&sched_numa_balancing))
+ task_tick_numa(rq, curr);
- task_tick_cache(rq, donor);
+ if (donor->sched_class == &fair_sched_class) {
+ task_tick_cache(rq, donor);
- update_misfit_status(donor, rq);
- check_update_overutilized_status(task_rq(donor));
+ update_misfit_status(donor, rq);
+ check_update_overutilized_status(task_rq(donor));
- task_tick_core(rq, donor);
+ task_tick_core(rq, donor);
+ }
}
/*
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 9:28 [PATCH v4 0/5] sched: Handle split scheduling and execution contexts in task ticks Hui Su
2026-09-09 9:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched: Dispatch task ticks for donor and execution classes Hui Su
2026-09-09 10:42 ` Hui Su
2026-09-09 17:43 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-10 10:49 ` Hui Su
2026-09-09 9:28 ` Hui Su [this message]
2026-09-09 9:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] sched/cache: Drive cache task tick from execution context Hui Su
2026-09-09 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-10 10:53 ` Hui Su
2026-09-09 9:29 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched/rt: Fix RT watchdog accounting for proxy execution Hui Su
2026-09-09 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-10 10:54 ` Hui Su
2026-09-12 17:30 ` Hui Su
2026-09-09 9:29 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched/core: Fix donor slice accounting under " Hui Su
2026-09-10 10:55 ` Hui Su
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909092901.2989564-3-sh_def@163.com \
--to=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=connoro@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®