mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/sched: Free the run queues at the end of drm_sched_fini()
@ 2026-09-10 12:16 Donggeun Yoo
       [not found] ` <20260910123736.6EB8D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
  2026-09-14 12:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Donggeun Yoo @ 2026-09-10 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Brost, Danilo Krummrich, Philipp Stanner
  Cc: Christian König, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Tvrtko Ursulin,
	Luben Tuikov, dri-devel, linux-kernel, donggeunyoo.kernel

drm_sched_fini() frees the run queues at the top of teardown but the array
holding them at the bottom. The early half is on the wrong side of
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sched->work_tdr), which waits for a timeout
handler that can still walk sched->sched_rq[i] through
drm_sched_increase_karma().

No correct driver can be there, since every fence returned from run_job()
must be signaled before drm_sched_fini() is called. Free the entries next
to the array anyway, so run-queue teardown happens in one place.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260910054605.634135-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com/
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
Signed-off-by: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
---
Targets drm-misc-next (0878e6053d01).

A cleanup - no Fixes:, no Cc: stable.

The KUnit case and how to run it:
https://github.com/donggeunyoo/drm-sched-fini-uaf-repro

x86_64 under QEMU, KUNIT + KASAN + lockdep, whole drm_sched suite, three
runs per arm:

  before  38-41 KASAN slab-use-after-free reports, all from
          drm_sched_increase_karma() on the timeout worker
  after   0

 drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
index 6cb6f9546493..fec04c944c5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
@@ -1210,9 +1210,6 @@ void drm_sched_fini(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 
 	drm_sched_wqueue_stop(sched);
 
-	for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL; i < sched->num_rqs; i++)
-		kfree(sched->sched_rq[i]);
-
 	/* Wakeup everyone stuck in drm_sched_entity_flush for this scheduler */
 	wake_up_all(&sched->job_scheduled);
 
@@ -1226,6 +1223,9 @@ void drm_sched_fini(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 	if (sched->own_submit_wq)
 		destroy_workqueue(sched->submit_wq);
 	sched->ready = false;
+
+	for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL; i < sched->num_rqs; i++)
+		kfree(sched->sched_rq[i]);
 	kfree(sched->sched_rq);
 	sched->sched_rq = NULL;
 
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/sched: Free the run queues at the end of drm_sched_fini()
       [not found] ` <20260910123736.6EB8D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
@ 2026-09-12  0:38   ` Donggeun Yoo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Donggeun Yoo @ 2026-09-12  0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sashiko-reviews, Matthew Brost, Danilo Krummrich, Philipp Stanner
  Cc: Donggeun Yoo, Christian König, Maarten Lankhorst,
	Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter,
	Tvrtko Ursulin, Luben Tuikov, dri-devel, linux-kernel

On 9/10/26 21:37, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> [Critical] Potential Use-After-Free of `sched` and `sched->sched_rq` if
> `drm_sched_fini()` is called with pending jobs and `own_submit_wq` is false.

The chain is there in the scheduler. drm_sched_start() queues work_run_job
unconditionally, and drm_sched_fini() destroys submit_wq only when it owns it,
so a timeout handler restarting the scheduler during teardown could leave work
behind that later reads sched->sched_rq[i].

No in-tree driver reaches it. Of the four that pass their own submit_wq:

  - panthor sets .timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT on both its schedulers, which
    drm_sched_start_timeout() tests before anything else, so the TDR never arms;
  - powervr refcounts the context, and pvr_queue_destroy() runs only after the
    last reference is dropped, which in-flight jobs hold;
  - nouveau waits on nouveau_sched_job_list_empty() before drm_sched_fini();
  - xe never calls drm_sched_start().

Both drivers named in the report are covered, for different reasons. So there
is nothing here for this patch, which only moves the run queue frees within
drm_sched_fini().

The one thing worth recording is that the protection is per-driver rather than
structural. A driver combining its own submit_wq, a finite timeout, and
drm_sched_start() in timedout_job would have to drain before teardown itself.

Regards,
Donggeun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/sched: Free the run queues at the end of drm_sched_fini()
  2026-09-10 12:16 [PATCH] drm/sched: Free the run queues at the end of drm_sched_fini() Donggeun Yoo
       [not found] ` <20260910123736.6EB8D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
@ 2026-09-14 12:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2026-09-14 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Donggeun Yoo, Matthew Brost, Danilo Krummrich, Philipp Stanner
  Cc: Christian König, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Luben Tuikov,
	dri-devel, linux-kernel


On 10/09/2026 13:16, Donggeun Yoo wrote:
> drm_sched_fini() frees the run queues at the top of teardown but the array
> holding them at the bottom. The early half is on the wrong side of
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sched->work_tdr), which waits for a timeout
> handler that can still walk sched->sched_rq[i] through
> drm_sched_increase_karma().
> 
> No correct driver can be there, since every fence returned from run_job()
> must be signaled before drm_sched_fini() is called. Free the entries next
> to the array anyway, so run-queue teardown happens in one place.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260910054605.634135-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com/
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
> ---
> Targets drm-misc-next (0878e6053d01).
> 
> A cleanup - no Fixes:, no Cc: stable.
> 
> The KUnit case and how to run it:
> https://github.com/donggeunyoo/drm-sched-fini-uaf-repro
> 
> x86_64 under QEMU, KUNIT + KASAN + lockdep, whole drm_sched suite, three
> runs per arm:
> 
>    before  38-41 KASAN slab-use-after-free reports, all from
>            drm_sched_increase_karma() on the timeout worker
>    after   0
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index 6cb6f9546493..fec04c944c5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -1210,9 +1210,6 @@ void drm_sched_fini(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>   
>   	drm_sched_wqueue_stop(sched);
>   
> -	for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL; i < sched->num_rqs; i++)
> -		kfree(sched->sched_rq[i]);
> -
>   	/* Wakeup everyone stuck in drm_sched_entity_flush for this scheduler */
>   	wake_up_all(&sched->job_scheduled);
>   
> @@ -1226,6 +1223,9 @@ void drm_sched_fini(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>   	if (sched->own_submit_wq)
>   		destroy_workqueue(sched->submit_wq);
>   	sched->ready = false;
> +
> +	for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL; i < sched->num_rqs; i++)
> +		kfree(sched->sched_rq[i]);
>   	kfree(sched->sched_rq);
>   	sched->sched_rq = NULL;
>   

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-14 12:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-10 12:16 [PATCH] drm/sched: Free the run queues at the end of drm_sched_fini() Donggeun Yoo
     [not found] ` <20260910123736.6EB8D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-09-12  0:38   ` Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-14 12:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®