From: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, nic_swsd@realtek.com
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>,
Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] r8169: don't enable chip LTR when the platform has not enabled LTR
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 18:31:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910130140.910-1-yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com> (raw)
rtl_enable_ltr() programs the MAC to generate LTR messages - ALDPS_LTR_EN,
LTR_SNOOP_EN, LTR_OBFF_LOCK_EN, plus LINK_SPEED_CHANGE_EN on
RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 - and rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable() calls it on
every ASPM enable, then goes on to let the chip trigger L1.2.
The only gate is tp->aspm_manageable, which records that the OS is allowed
to control ASPM. It says nothing about LTR. LTR is a separate PCIe
capability that only works if every device on the path to the root port
supports it. The PCI core works that out in pci_configure_ltr() and
records the result in pci_dev->ltr_path; per PCIe r6.0 sec 7.5.3.16 a
function must not issue LTR messages while LTR Mechanism Enable is clear.
So on a platform whose hierarchy has no LTR path, the driver tells the
chip to start sending LTR messages nothing will honour, and ties ALDPS -
the PHY's link-down power saving - to them. A report against RTL8125B
(rev 05, firmware rtl8125b-2_0.0.2) in a mini PC shows the effect: 291
link down/up transitions in one eight-hour boot, with repeated downshifts
to 100Mbps, against four transitions at boot and then a stable link on
the kernel before the LTR change.
Gate the chip's LTR programming on pci_dev->ltr_path. That field lives
inside CONFIG_PCIEASPM, and without ASPM support there is nothing here to
enable LTR for, so compile the function out in that configuration.
Note this does change CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n builds, which used to program
chip LTR unconditionally: pci_disable_link_state() is a stub that returns
success there, so tp->aspm_manageable ends up set. The PCI core does not
configure LTR in that configuration either.
Fixes: 9ab94a32af70 ("r8169: enable LTR support")
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2529752
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- Gate on pci_dev->ltr_path instead of reading PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2 directly,
and compile rtl_enable_ltr() out for CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n, where that
field does not exist and there is nothing to enable LTR for.
Suggested by Heiner Kallweit.
- Commit message notes the resulting change for CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n builds.
- No change to the RTL8125 register programming itself.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260909110554.1977-1-yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com/
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
index ec4fc21fa21f..05f7a44aff01 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
@@ -3035,8 +3035,16 @@ static void rtl_disable_exit_l1(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
}
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
{
+ /* The chip must not issue LTR messages unless LTR is enabled on the
+ * whole path up to the root port. pci_configure_ltr() works that out
+ * and records the result in pci_dev->ltr_path.
+ */
+ if (!tp->pci_dev->ltr_path)
+ return;
+
switch (tp->mac_version) {
case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80:
r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd0, 0x9003);
@@ -3120,6 +3128,11 @@ static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
/* chip can trigger LTR */
r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_OBFF_LOCK, 0x0003, LTR_OBFF_LOCK_EN);
}
+#else
+static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
+{
+}
+#endif
static void rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(struct rtl8169_private *tp, bool enable)
{
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 13:01 Yogesh Gaur [this message]
2026-09-10 19:33 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-09-11 13:00 ` Yogesh Gaur
2026-09-11 13:14 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH net v3] " Yogesh Gaur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910130140.910-1-yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com \
--to=yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=javen_xu@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®