mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com>
Cc: nic_swsd@realtek.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] r8169: don't enable chip LTR when the platform has not enabled LTR
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:14:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc33c0ec-ae64-464f-b656-8c55bb17cacd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG6enPy441a-cyzsP2_WoQ1+4rj6gikWzOrNmX6yXx1mOo-M1Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 11.09.2026 15:00, Yogesh Gaur wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 1:03 AM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10.09.2026 15:01, Yogesh Gaur wrote:
>>> rtl_enable_ltr() programs the MAC to generate LTR messages - ALDPS_LTR_EN,
>>>
>>
>> Empty lines, mail formatting issue?
> Yes, I would correct it in v3.
> 
>>
>>> LTR_SNOOP_EN, LTR_OBFF_LOCK_EN, plus LINK_SPEED_CHANGE_EN on
>>>
>>> RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 - and rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable() calls it on
>>>
>>> every ASPM enable, then goes on to let the chip trigger L1.2.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The only gate is tp->aspm_manageable, which records that the OS is allowed
>>>
>>> to control ASPM. It says nothing about LTR. LTR is a separate PCIe
>>>
>>> capability that only works if every device on the path to the root port
>>>
>>> supports it. The PCI core works that out in pci_configure_ltr() and
>>>
>>> records the result in pci_dev->ltr_path; per PCIe r6.0 sec 7.5.3.16 a
>>>
>>> function must not issue LTR messages while LTR Mechanism Enable is clear.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So on a platform whose hierarchy has no LTR path, the driver tells the
>>>
>>> chip to start sending LTR messages nothing will honour, and ties ALDPS -
>>>
>>> the PHY's link-down power saving - to them. A report against RTL8125B
>>>
>>> (rev 05, firmware rtl8125b-2_0.0.2) in a mini PC shows the effect: 291
>>
>> Did you verify that this is caused by LTR messages, and not by any other
>> root cause?
>>
>>>
>>> link down/up transitions in one eight-hour boot, with repeated downshifts
>>>
>>> to 100Mbps, against four transitions at boot and then a stable link on
>>>
>>> the kernel before the LTR change.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gate the chip's LTR programming on pci_dev->ltr_path. That field lives
>>>
>>> inside CONFIG_PCIEASPM, and without ASPM support there is nothing here to
>>>
>>> enable LTR for, so compile the function out in that configuration.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Note this does change CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n builds, which used to program
>>>
>>> chip LTR unconditionally: pci_disable_link_state() is a stub that returns
>>>
>>> success there, so tp->aspm_manageable ends up set. The PCI core does not
>>>
>>> configure LTR in that configuration either.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 9ab94a32af70 ("r8169: enable LTR support")
>>>
>>> Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2529752
>>
>> Did you verify that your patch fixes the reported issue? Or do you
>> just assume this? Because in the bug comment history I don't see
>> a statement that issue has been resolved.
> I don't have a board with me, hence have not verified it. I did a
> compile check only.

If it's not verified that your patch fixes the reported issue, better
remove the Closes line.

>>
>>> Assisted-by: LLM
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v2:
>>>
>>>  - Gate on pci_dev->ltr_path instead of reading PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2 directly,
>>>
>>>    and compile rtl_enable_ltr() out for CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n, where that
>>>
>>>    field does not exist and there is nothing to enable LTR for.
>>>
>>>    Suggested by Heiner Kallweit.
>>>
>>>  - Commit message notes the resulting change for CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n builds.
>>>
>>>  - No change to the RTL8125 register programming itself.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260909110554.1977-1-yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>
>>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>
>>> index ec4fc21fa21f..05f7a44aff01 100644
>>>
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>
>>> @@ -3035,8 +3035,16 @@ static void rtl_disable_exit_l1(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>>>
>>>       }
>>>
>>>  }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
>>>
>>>  static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>>>
>>>  {
>>>
>>> +     /* The chip must not issue LTR messages unless LTR is enabled on the
>>>
>>> +      * whole path up to the root port. pci_configure_ltr() works that out
>>>
>>> +      * and records the result in pci_dev->ltr_path.
>>>
>>> +      */
>>>
>>> +     if (!tp->pci_dev->ltr_path)
>>
>> Simpler would be:
>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEASPM) || !tp->pci_dev->ltr_path)
>>
> I tried that and it does not build, because ltr_path itself is declared
> inside the #ifdef:
> 
>   include/linux/pci.h:443
>     #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
>             struct pcie_link_state  *link_state;
>             unsigned int    aspm_l0s_support:1;
>             unsigned int    aspm_l1_support:1;
>             unsigned int    ltr_path:1;
>     #endif
> 
> IS_ENABLED() is a C expression, so the member reference still has to
> compile even when the left operand is 0:
> 
>   drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c: In function 'rtl_enable_ltr':
>   error: 'struct pci_dev' has no member named 'ltr_path'
>        if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEASPM) || !tp->pci_dev->ltr_path)
> 
Right, ofc ..

>> Then you don't need the stub function.
>>
> You are right that the stub function should go, though. v3 drops it and
> keeps a single rtl_enable_ltr() with the guard inline:
> 
>         static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>         {
>                 /* comment */
>         #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
>                 if (!tp->pci_dev->ltr_path)
>                         return;
>         #else
>                 return;
>         #endif

LGTM

>>>
>>> +             return;
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>>       switch (tp->mac_version) {
>>>
>>>       case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80:
>>>
>>>               r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd0, 0x9003);
>>>
>>> @@ -3120,6 +3128,11 @@ static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>>>
>>>       /* chip can trigger LTR */
>>>
>>>       r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_OBFF_LOCK, 0x0003, LTR_OBFF_LOCK_EN);
>>>
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +#else
>>>
>>> +static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>>>
>>> +{
>>>
>>> +}
>>>
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  static void rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(struct rtl8169_private *tp, bool enable)
>>>
>>>  {
>>>
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10 13:01 Yogesh Gaur
2026-09-10 19:33 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-09-11 13:00   ` Yogesh Gaur
2026-09-11 13:14     ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2026-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH net v3] " Yogesh Gaur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc33c0ec-ae64-464f-b656-8c55bb17cacd@gmail.com \
    --to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=javen_xu@realsil.com.cn \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®