mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf v3] bpf: Fix non-linear SRH access in bpf_update_srh_state()
@ 2026-09-10 14:25 Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs) @ 2026-09-10 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: daniel, john.fastabend, sdf, martin.lau, ast, andrii, eddyz87,
	memxor, song, yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, ihor.solodrai, davem,
	edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, m.xhonneux, dlebrun, netdev,
	linux-kernel, AutonomousCodeSecurity, xmei5, tgopinath, kys,
	Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)

bpf_update_srh_state() locates an SRH with ipv6_find_hdr() and caches
skb->data + srhoff in the per-CPU SEG6 BPF state. This assumes that the
returned offset is within the skb linear head.

That assumption is wrong because ipv6_find_hdr() uses skb_header_pointer()
and can locate an SRH in non-linear data. The direct srh->hdrlen read and
the cached SRH pointer can therefore access memory outside the linear area.

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_update_srh_state+0x1bc/0x200
 net/core/filter.c:7027 bpf_update_srh_state()
 bpf_lwt_seg6_action()
 input_action_end_bpf()
 seg6_local_input()
 ipv6_rthdr_rcv()

Fix this by using seg6_get_srh(), which pulls and validates the complete
SRH and reloads its pointer afterwards. Pulling can reallocate skb->head,
so refresh the BPF data pointers inside bpf_update_srh_state() immediately
after the call.

For End.DT6, make the inner IPv6 base header linear before removing the
outer headers. Pulling only the outer headers can leave the inner header in
non-linear data, while ipv6_find_hdr() and the nexthop lookup access it
directly. The helper parameter may point into packet data, so copy the
table ID before pulling and potentially replacing skb->head. Clear the
cached SRH pointer and refresh the BPF data pointers if the pull fails.

End.B6 and End.B6.Encap can insert a new SRH and reallocate the skb before
a later HMAC calculation or nexthop lookup returns an error. Rebuild the
SRH state when the skb length changes, which indicates that the new SRH was
inserted. Failures before insertion leave the existing state unchanged.

Fixes: 486cdf21583e ("bpf: add End.DT6 action to bpf_lwt_seg6_action helper")
Reported-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260901183151.16648-1-cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com/
Suggested-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABFh=a5iLOEJdPhoaWUhLc0eEqAuhnd83_jJr9MVZZG6gSJAEw@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABFh=a4VyzxsQqsayWpTKjxY3HL2C072u=pbecEpNDbL9eBNKA@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs) <cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com>
Assisted-by: Copilot:gpt-5.6-sol
---
Changes in v3:
- Copy the End.DT6 table ID before pskb_may_pull() can replace skb->head
  and invalidate a packet-backed helper parameter.
- Rebase onto the current bpf master branch.

Changes in v2:
- Rebuild the SRH state after End.B6 and End.B6.Encap only when the skb
  length changes, avoiding selection of a spent Routing Header on errors
  before insertion.
- Rebase onto the current bpf master branch.

Please queue this fix for stable kernels.

Testing:
- Built net/core/filter.o with CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF=y.
- checkpatch.pl, diff --check and exact-base patch replay.
- No targeted runtime selftest was added. BPF LWT test-run does not support
  non-linear skbs, and the existing SEG6 netns test does not create a
  split inner IPv6 header for End.DT6.

 net/core/filter.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 2a84f9d01131..06a748c07747 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -7017,15 +7017,16 @@ static void bpf_update_srh_state(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct seg6_bpf_srh_state *srh_state =
 		this_cpu_ptr(&seg6_bpf_srh_states);
-	int srhoff = 0;
+	struct ipv6_sr_hdr *srh;
 
-	if (ipv6_find_hdr(skb, &srhoff, IPPROTO_ROUTING, NULL, NULL) < 0) {
-		srh_state->srh = NULL;
-	} else {
-		srh_state->srh = (struct ipv6_sr_hdr *)(skb->data + srhoff);
-		srh_state->hdrlen = srh_state->srh->hdrlen << 3;
-		srh_state->valid = true;
-	}
+	srh = seg6_get_srh(skb, 0);
+	bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
+	srh_state->srh = srh;
+	if (!srh)
+		return;
+
+	srh_state->hdrlen = srh->hdrlen << 3;
+	srh_state->valid = true;
 }
 
 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_lwt_seg6_action, struct sk_buff *, skb,
@@ -7033,6 +7034,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_lwt_seg6_action, struct sk_buff *, skb,
 {
 	struct seg6_bpf_srh_state *srh_state =
 		this_cpu_ptr(&seg6_bpf_srh_states);
+	unsigned int old_len;
 	int hdroff = 0;
 	int err;
 
@@ -7050,40 +7052,49 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_lwt_seg6_action, struct sk_buff *, skb,
 		if (param_len != sizeof(int))
 			return -EINVAL;
 		return seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, NULL, *(int *)param);
-	case SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_END_DT6:
+	case SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_END_DT6: {
+		int tbl_id;
+
 		if (!seg6_bpf_has_valid_srh(skb))
 			return -EBADMSG;
 		if (param_len != sizeof(int))
 			return -EINVAL;
+		tbl_id = *(int *)param;
 
 		if (ipv6_find_hdr(skb, &hdroff, IPPROTO_IPV6, NULL, NULL) < 0)
 			return -EBADMSG;
-		if (!pskb_pull(skb, hdroff))
+		if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, hdroff + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr))) {
+			srh_state->srh = NULL;
+			bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
 			return -EBADMSG;
+		}
+		__skb_pull(skb, hdroff);
 
 		skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, skb_network_header(skb), hdroff);
 		skb_reset_network_header(skb);
 		skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
 		skb->encapsulation = 0;
 
-		bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
 		bpf_update_srh_state(skb);
-		return seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, NULL, *(int *)param);
+		return seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, NULL, tbl_id);
+	}
 	case SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_END_B6:
 		if (srh_state->srh && !seg6_bpf_has_valid_srh(skb))
 			return -EBADMSG;
+		old_len = skb->len;
 		err = bpf_push_seg6_encap(skb, BPF_LWT_ENCAP_SEG6_INLINE,
 					  param, param_len);
-		if (!err)
+		if (skb->len != old_len)
 			bpf_update_srh_state(skb);
 
 		return err;
 	case SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_END_B6_ENCAP:
 		if (srh_state->srh && !seg6_bpf_has_valid_srh(skb))
 			return -EBADMSG;
+		old_len = skb->len;
 		err = bpf_push_seg6_encap(skb, BPF_LWT_ENCAP_SEG6,
 					  param, param_len);
-		if (!err)
+		if (skb->len != old_len)
 			bpf_update_srh_state(skb);
 
 		return err;

base-commit: e4a62833adff6ef0fe7c0b90393204fe3c26b5c5
-- 
2.55.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-09-10 14:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-10 14:25 [PATCH bpf v3] bpf: Fix non-linear SRH access in bpf_update_srh_state() Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®