From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>
Cc: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Benson Leung" <bleung@chromium.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <groeck@chromium.org>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"Mark Pearson" <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>,
"Derek J. Clark" <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>,
"Hans de Goede" <hansg@kernel.org>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Ike Panhc" <ikepanhc@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Vishnu Sankar" <vishnuocv@gmail.com>,
"Vishnu Sankar" <vsankar@lenovo.com>,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/12] leds: trigger: Add offloaded() callback and provide trigger_may_offload attribute
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:05:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910150535.GG1051768@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902-leds-trigger-hw-changed-v6-4-55693cd78877@rong.moe>
On Wed, 02 Sep 2026, Rong Zhang wrote:
> There are multiple triggers implementing hardware control. However, the
> LED trigger core doesn't really know the hardware control (offloaded)
> state since the coordination is done directly between the trigger and
> the LED driver. It can only assume private triggers as offloaded and
> generic ones as not offloaded.
>
> Add an offloaded() callback so that triggers can report their offloaded
> states to the LED trigger core. When unimplemented, it defaults to true
> for private triggers and false for generic ones to keep the current
> behavior unchanged.
>
> With that, provide a new attribute "trigger_may_offload", so that
> userspace can determine:
>
> - if the LED device supports hardware control (supported => visible)
> - which trigger is the hardware control trigger selected by the LED
> device
> - if the trigger is selected ("<foo_trigger>")
> - if the trigger is offloaded ("[foo_trigger]")
>
> Note: the documentation describes the attribute as "returning a list"
> despite the LED core currently only supports one hardware control
> trigger per LED device. This is intentional to make the attribute
> extensible in the future without breaking userspace.
>
> Acked-by: Ike Panhc <ikepanhc@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - Update Date: and KernelVersion: for the document of
> /sys/class/leds/<led>/trigger_may_offload
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Rearrange the series so that the code using the offloaded() callback is
> introduced before the driver implementation (thanks Thomas Weißschuh)
> - Reword documentation (ditto)
> - Adopt guard() and lockdep (ditto)
> - Adopt __led_trigger_is_hw_controlled() from newly-integrated PATCH 1
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> Documentation/leds/leds-class.rst | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/leds/led-class.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/leds/led-triggers.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/leds/leds.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/leds.h | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led
> index d4c918cc11a1..e3605fc55fa8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led
> @@ -78,6 +78,28 @@ Description:
> (which would often be configured in the device tree for the
> hardware).
>
> +What: /sys/class/leds/<led>/trigger_may_offload
*_to_hw?
> +Date: September 2026
> +KernelVersion: 7.4
> +Contact: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
> +Description:
> + Names and states of triggers that may be offloaded to hardware.
> + Such triggers are also called "hardware control trigger" in some
> + context.
> +
> + Only exists when the LED supports trigger offload.
> +
> + Reading this file returns a list of triggers that are capable to
> + be offloaded. The optional brackets around the trigger name
> + indicate the state of the current trigger:
> +
> + - `foo_trigger`: the trigger is not selected.
> + - `<foo_trigger>`: the trigger is selected, but falls back to
> + software blink for some reason (e.g., incompatible trigger
> + parameters)
> + - `[foo_trigger]`: the trigger is selected and offloaded to
> + hardware.
> +
> What: /sys/class/leds/<led>/inverted
> Date: January 2011
> KernelVersion: 2.6.38
> diff --git a/Documentation/leds/leds-class.rst b/Documentation/leds/leds-class.rst
> index 3913966cfdac..2d41a6db602c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/leds/leds-class.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/leds/leds-class.rst
> @@ -242,6 +242,9 @@ ops and needs to declare specific support for the supported triggers.
>
> With hw control we refer to the LED driven by hardware.
>
> +A sysfs attribute `trigger_may_offload` is provided for userspace to
> +query supported triggers and their states.
> +
> LED driver must define the following value to support hw control:
>
> - hw_control_trigger:
> @@ -298,6 +301,15 @@ LED driver must implement the following API to support hw control:
> Returns a pointer to a struct device or NULL if nothing
> is currently attached.
>
> +LED trigger should implement the following API to indicate hw control:
> + - offloaded:
hw_offloaded?
> + return a boolean indicating if the trigger is currently
> + offloaded to hardware.
> +
> + If a trigger doesn't implement this callback, the default
> + value will be true for private triggers and false for generic
> + ones.
> +
> LED driver can activate additional modes by default to workaround the
> impossibility of supporting each different mode on the supported trigger.
> Examples are hardcoding the blink speed to a set interval, enable special
> @@ -311,6 +323,14 @@ the end use hw_control_set to activate hw control.
> A trigger can use hw_control_get to check if a LED is already in hw control
> and init their flags.
>
> +Alternatively, a private trigger can be implemented along with the LED driver if
> +the LED's hardware control doesn't fit any generic trigger. To associate the
> +private trigger with the LED classdev, their `trigger_type` must be the same. To
> +declare that the private trigger provides hardware control for the associated
> +LED classdev, set the `hw_control_trigger` string to the trigger's name. Since
> +both the LED classdev and the private trigger are in the same LED driver, it's
> +not necessary for them to coordinate via `hw_control_*` callbacks.
> +
> When the LED is in hw control, no software blink is possible and doing so
> will effectively disable hw control.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-class.c b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
> index 39cc2f3ea63f..7e571bd1de5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/led-class.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
> @@ -96,8 +96,30 @@ static const struct bin_attribute *const led_trigger_bin_attrs[] = {
> &bin_attr_trigger,
> NULL,
> };
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(trigger_may_offload);
> +static struct attribute *led_trigger_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_trigger_may_offload.attr,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static umode_t led_trigger_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
Why doesn't all of this live in the triggers file as well?
> + struct attribute *attr,
> + int idx)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> + struct led_classdev *led_cdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + if (attr == &dev_attr_trigger_may_offload.attr)
> + return led_cdev->hw_control_trigger ? attr->mode : 0;
> +
> + return attr->mode;
> +}
> +
> static const struct attribute_group led_trigger_group = {
> .bin_attrs = led_trigger_bin_attrs,
> + .attrs = led_trigger_attrs,
> + .is_visible = led_trigger_is_visible,
> };
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-triggers.c b/drivers/leds/led-triggers.c
> index 804a04b326c4..de17a8bbb4d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/led-triggers.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-triggers.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ static bool __led_trigger_is_hw_controlled(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
> if (!led_cdev->trigger)
> return false;
>
> + if (led_cdev->trigger->offloaded)
> + return led_cdev->trigger->offloaded(led_cdev);
> +
> + /* Otherwise assume private triggers as always offloaded. */
s/as/are/
> return led_cdev->trigger->trigger_type;
> }
>
> @@ -341,6 +345,32 @@ void led_trigger_set_default(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(led_trigger_set_default);
>
> +ssize_t trigger_may_offload_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct led_classdev *led_cdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct led_trigger *trig;
> + bool hit, offloaded;
> + int len;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&led_cdev->led_access);
> + guard(rwsem_read)(&led_cdev->trigger_lock);
> +
> + trig = led_cdev->trigger;
> +
> + offloaded = __led_trigger_is_hw_controlled(led_cdev);
> + hit = offloaded || (trig && !strcmp(led_cdev->hw_control_trigger, trig->name));
> +
> + /* [offloaded] <active_but_not_offloaded> inactive */
Why do they have to live in different 'containers'?
> + len = sysfs_emit(buf, "%s%s%s\n",
> + offloaded ? "[" : (hit ? "<" : ""),
> + led_cdev->hw_control_trigger,
> + offloaded ? "]" : (hit ? ">" : ""));
> +
> + return len;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trigger_may_offload_show);
> +
> /* LED Trigger Interface */
>
> int led_trigger_register(struct led_trigger *trig)
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds.h b/drivers/leds/leds.h
> index bee46651e068..b08a289397e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds.h
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ ssize_t led_trigger_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> ssize_t led_trigger_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf,
> loff_t pos, size_t count);
> +ssize_t trigger_may_offload_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf);
>
> extern struct rw_semaphore leds_list_lock;
> extern struct list_head leds_list;
> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
> index d778709f5b1b..bee2b4309a09 100644
> --- a/include/linux/leds.h
> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
> @@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ struct led_trigger {
> const char *name;
> int (*activate)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev);
> void (*deactivate)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev);
> + bool (*offloaded)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev);
>
> /* Brightness set by led_trigger_event */
> enum led_brightness brightness;
>
> --
> 2.55.0
>
--
Lee Jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 18:09 [PATCH v6 00/12] leds: Add support for hardware-initiated hardware control trigger transition Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] leds: class: Always protect brightness_show() with led_access Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] leds: Move led_trigger_is_hw_controlled() to the right place Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] leds: class: Remove hardware control trigger when writing brightness Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] leds: trigger: Add offloaded() callback and provide trigger_may_offload attribute Rong Zhang
2026-09-10 15:05 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2026-09-10 18:01 ` Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] leds: cros_ec: Implement offloaded() trigger callback Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] leds: turris-omnia: Implement offloaded() trigger callback and declare hw_control_trigger Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] leds: trigger: netdev: Implement offloaded() callback Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] leds: trigger: Enforce strict checks in led_trigger_is_hw_controlled() Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] leds: trigger: Add led_trigger_notify_hw_control_changed() interface Rong Zhang
2026-09-10 15:45 ` Lee Jones
2026-09-10 18:17 ` Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: Serialize keyboard backlight tracking Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: Decouple hardware & classdev brightness for keyboard backlight Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: Fully support auto " Rong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910150535.GG1051768@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=i@rong.moe \
--cc=ikepanhc@gmail.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vishnuocv@gmail.com \
--cc=vsankar@lenovo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®