mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,  "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
	 Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 09/10] KVM: x86: Add guarded_by annotations for kvm_arch, kvm_hv, and ioapic
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:21:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910162343.4092060-10-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910162343.4092060-1-elver@google.com>

Add __guarded_by annotations to a subset of fields across x86 state
(struct kvm_hv, struct kvm_arch, and struct kvm_ioapic) where the
protecting locks reside in the same struct scope. Mark deliberate
lockless updates with data_race().

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c           |  4 ++--
 arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h           | 16 ++++++++--------
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |  8 ++++----
 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 683bb8bf43a9..a0d2d6c08e47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1073,20 +1073,20 @@ struct kvm_hv {
 	struct mutex hv_lock;
 	u64 hv_guest_os_id;
 	u64 hv_hypercall;
-	u64 hv_tsc_page;
+	u64 hv_tsc_page __guarded_by(&hv_lock);
 	enum hv_tsc_page_status hv_tsc_page_status;
 
 	/* Hyper-v based guest crash (NT kernel bugcheck) parameters */
-	u64 hv_crash_param[HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_PARAMS];
-	u64 hv_crash_ctl;
+	u64 hv_crash_param[HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_PARAMS] __guarded_by(&hv_lock);
+	u64 hv_crash_ctl __guarded_by(&hv_lock);
 
 	struct ms_hyperv_tsc_page tsc_ref;
 
 	struct idr conn_to_evt;
 
-	u64 hv_reenlightenment_control;
-	u64 hv_tsc_emulation_control;
-	u64 hv_tsc_emulation_status;
+	u64 hv_reenlightenment_control __guarded_by(&hv_lock);
+	u64 hv_tsc_emulation_control __guarded_by(&hv_lock);
+	u64 hv_tsc_emulation_status __guarded_by(&hv_lock);
 	u64 hv_invtsc_control;
 
 	/* How many vCPUs have VP index != vCPU index */
@@ -1232,15 +1232,15 @@ struct kvm_arch {
 	 * preemption-disabled region, so it must be a raw spinlock.
 	 */
 	raw_spinlock_t tsc_write_lock;
-	u64 last_tsc_nsec;
-	u64 last_tsc_write;
-	u32 last_tsc_khz;
-	u64 last_tsc_offset;
-	u64 cur_tsc_nsec;
-	u64 cur_tsc_write;
-	u64 cur_tsc_offset;
-	u64 cur_tsc_generation;
-	int nr_vcpus_matched_tsc;
+	u64 last_tsc_nsec __guarded_by(&tsc_write_lock);
+	u64 last_tsc_write __guarded_by(&tsc_write_lock);
+	u32 last_tsc_khz __guarded_by(&tsc_write_lock);
+	u64 last_tsc_offset __guarded_by(&tsc_write_lock);
+	u64 cur_tsc_nsec __guarded_by(&tsc_write_lock);
+	u64 cur_tsc_write __guarded_by(&tsc_write_lock);
+	u64 cur_tsc_offset __guarded_by(&tsc_write_lock);
+	u64 cur_tsc_generation __guarded_by(&tsc_write_lock);
+	int nr_vcpus_matched_tsc __guarded_by(&tsc_write_lock);
 
 	u32 default_tsc_khz;
 	bool user_set_tsc;
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
 #endif
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
-	hpa_t	hv_root_tdp;
+	hpa_t	hv_root_tdp __guarded_by(&hv_root_tdp_lock);
 	spinlock_t hv_root_tdp_lock;
 	struct hv_partition_assist_pg *hv_pa_pg;
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
index d6865e557abe..7affe2584036 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
@@ -739,11 +739,11 @@ int kvm_ioapic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 	ioapic = kzalloc_obj(struct kvm_ioapic, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!ioapic)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	spin_lock_init(&ioapic->lock);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ioapic->eoi_inject, kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work);
 	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&ioapic->mask_notifier_list);
 	kvm->arch.vioapic = ioapic;
-	kvm_ioapic_reset(ioapic);
+	scoped_guard(spinlock_init, &ioapic->lock)
+		kvm_ioapic_reset(ioapic);
 	kvm_iodevice_init(&ioapic->dev, &ioapic_mmio_ops);
 	ioapic->kvm = kvm;
 	mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h
index 81b576513116..1f87396c0a79 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h
@@ -70,19 +70,19 @@ union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry {
 
 struct kvm_ioapic {
 	u64 base_address;
-	u32 ioregsel;
-	u32 id;
-	u32 irr;
+	u32 ioregsel __guarded_by(&lock);
+	u32 id __guarded_by(&lock);
+	u32 irr __guarded_by(&lock);
 	u32 pad;
-	union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry redirtbl[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
-	unsigned long irq_states[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
+	union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry redirtbl[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS] __guarded_by(&lock);
+	unsigned long irq_states[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS] __guarded_by(&lock);
 	struct kvm_io_device dev;
 	struct kvm *kvm;
 	spinlock_t lock;
-	struct rtc_status rtc_status;
+	struct rtc_status rtc_status __guarded_by(&lock);
 	struct delayed_work eoi_inject;
-	u32 irq_eoi[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
-	u32 irr_delivered;
+	u32 irq_eoi[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS] __guarded_by(&lock);
+	u32 irr_delivered __guarded_by(&lock);
 
 	/* reads protected by irq_srcu, writes by irq_lock */
 	struct hlist_head mask_notifier_list;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 9893705d0dfa..5d4b2c7aa9b8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -9813,8 +9813,8 @@ int kvm_arch_enable_virtualization_cpu(void)
 			 * you may have some problem.  Solving this issue is
 			 * left as an exercise to the reader.
 			 */
-			kvm->arch.last_tsc_nsec = 0;
-			kvm->arch.last_tsc_write = 0;
+			data_race(kvm->arch.last_tsc_nsec = 0);
+			data_race(kvm->arch.last_tsc_write = 0);
 		}
 
 	}
@@ -9927,8 +9927,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
 	kvm->arch.enable_pmu = enable_pmu && !kvm->arch.has_protected_pmu;
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
-	spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.hv_root_tdp_lock);
-	kvm->arch.hv_root_tdp = INVALID_PAGE;
+	scoped_guard(spinlock_init, &kvm->arch.hv_root_tdp_lock)
+		kvm->arch.hv_root_tdp = INVALID_PAGE;
 #endif
 
 	kvm_apicv_init(kvm);
-- 
2.55.0.1003.g10538fe699-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10 16:21 [PATCH RFC 00/10] KVM: Enable Clang Context Analysis Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] KVM: x86/pmu: Acquire SRCU in pmc_is_event_allowed() to protect filter lookup Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] KVM: Allow reading memslots while holding slots_arch_lock Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 17:11     ` Marco Elver
2026-09-10 17:52       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 19:05         ` Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] KVM: guest_memfd: Avoid conditional mmu_lock acquisition Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] KVM: Refactor kvm_handle_hva_range() to avoid conditional mmu_lock Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:38   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] KVM: Refactor kvm_handle_gfn_range() " Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] KVM: Add basic lock context annotations Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] KVM: x86: " Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] KVM: Add guarded_by to members in struct kvm Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] KVM: x86: Enable CONTEXT_ANALYSIS with opt-outs Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:55 ` [PATCH RFC 00/10] KVM: Enable Clang Context Analysis Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 19:19   ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260910162343.4092060-10-elver@google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®