mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,  "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
	 Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 08/10] KVM: Add guarded_by to members in struct kvm
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:21:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910162343.4092060-9-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910162343.4092060-1-elver@google.com>

Add __guarded_by annotations to a subset of members in struct kvm where
the protecting locks reside in the same struct scope. Members protected
by locks across nested or parent struct boundaries are omitted due to C
lexical scoping limitations.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
 include/linux/kvm_host.h | 12 ++++++------
 virt/kvm/eventfd.c       |  4 ++--
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 12f241304228..36edf0a59107 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ struct kvm {
 	/* The two memslot sets - active and inactive (per address space) */
 	struct kvm_memslots __memslots[KVM_MAX_NR_ADDRESS_SPACES][2];
 	/* The current active memslot set for each address space */
-	struct kvm_memslots __rcu *memslots[KVM_MAX_NR_ADDRESS_SPACES];
+	struct kvm_memslots __rcu *memslots[KVM_MAX_NR_ADDRESS_SPACES] __guarded_by(&srcu, &slots_lock, &slots_arch_lock);
 	struct xarray vcpu_array;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(vcpu_ids, KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS);
 	/*
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ struct kvm {
 
 	/* For management / invalidation of gfn_to_pfn_caches */
 	spinlock_t gpc_lock;
-	struct list_head gpc_list;
+	struct list_head gpc_list __guarded_by(&gpc_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * created_vcpus is protected by kvm->lock, and is incremented
@@ -801,11 +801,11 @@ struct kvm {
 	int last_boosted_vcpu;
 	struct list_head vm_list;
 	struct mutex lock;
-	struct kvm_io_bus __rcu *buses[KVM_NR_BUSES];
+	struct kvm_io_bus __rcu *buses[KVM_NR_BUSES] __guarded_by(&srcu, &slots_lock);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP
 	struct {
 		spinlock_t        lock;
-		struct list_head  items;
+		struct list_head  items __guarded_by(&lock);
 		/* resampler_list update side is protected by resampler_lock. */
 		struct list_head  resampler_list;
 		struct mutex      resampler_lock;
@@ -826,9 +826,9 @@ struct kvm {
 	/*
 	 * Update side is protected by irq_lock.
 	 */
-	struct kvm_irq_routing_table __rcu *irq_routing;
+	struct kvm_irq_routing_table __rcu *irq_routing __guarded_by(&irq_srcu, &irq_lock);
 
-	struct hlist_head irq_ack_notifier_list;
+	struct hlist_head irq_ack_notifier_list __guarded_by(&irq_srcu, &irq_lock);
 #endif
 
 	struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index 6701390336f6..6051fec5ec90 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -1046,8 +1046,8 @@ void
 kvm_eventfd_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP
-	spin_lock_init(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->irqfds.items);
+	scoped_guard(spinlock_init, &kvm->irqfds.lock)
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->irqfds.items);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->irqfds.resampler_list);
 	mutex_init(&kvm->irqfds.resampler_lock);
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 2f22d5439d39..871acc3aebbd 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1111,6 +1111,7 @@ void __weak kvm_arch_create_vm_debugfs(struct kvm *kvm)
 /* Called only on cleanup and destruction paths when there are no users. */
 static inline struct kvm_io_bus *kvm_get_bus_for_destruction(struct kvm *kvm,
 							     enum kvm_bus idx)
+	__context_unsafe(/* destruction */)
 {
 	return rcu_dereference_protected(kvm->buses[idx],
 					 !refcount_read(&kvm->users_count));
@@ -1120,6 +1121,7 @@ static int kvm_enable_virtualization(void);
 static void kvm_disable_virtualization(void);
 
 static struct kvm *kvm_create_vm(unsigned long type, const char *fdname)
+	__context_unsafe(/* constructor */)
 {
 	struct kvm *kvm = kvm_arch_alloc_vm();
 	struct kvm_memslots *slots;
@@ -1276,6 +1278,7 @@ static void kvm_destroy_devices(struct kvm *kvm)
 }
 
 static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
+	__context_unsafe(/* destructor */)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct mm_struct *mm = kvm->mm;
-- 
2.55.0.1003.g10538fe699-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10 16:21 [PATCH RFC 00/10] KVM: Enable Clang Context Analysis Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] KVM: x86/pmu: Acquire SRCU in pmc_is_event_allowed() to protect filter lookup Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] KVM: Allow reading memslots while holding slots_arch_lock Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 17:11     ` Marco Elver
2026-09-10 17:52       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 19:05         ` Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] KVM: guest_memfd: Avoid conditional mmu_lock acquisition Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] KVM: Refactor kvm_handle_hva_range() to avoid conditional mmu_lock Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:38   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] KVM: Refactor kvm_handle_gfn_range() " Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] KVM: Add basic lock context annotations Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] KVM: x86: " Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] KVM: x86: Add guarded_by annotations for kvm_arch, kvm_hv, and ioapic Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] KVM: x86: Enable CONTEXT_ANALYSIS with opt-outs Marco Elver
2026-09-10 16:55 ` [PATCH RFC 00/10] KVM: Enable Clang Context Analysis Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 19:19   ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260910162343.4092060-9-elver@google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®