* [PATCH] dmaengine: fsl_raid: fix 64-bit ring base address programming
@ 2026-09-10 20:17 Rosen Penev
2026-09-11 15:42 ` Frank Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rosen Penev @ 2026-09-10 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dmaengine; +Cc: Vinod Koul, Frank Li, Xuelin Shi, Harninder Rai, open list
The driver claims a 40-bit DMA mask via dma_set_mask(40), but the
inbound/outbound ring base addresses were programmed by masking the
physical address with FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_MASK (0xF) into the high register
and shifting it right by FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_SHIFT (4) into the low register.
This truncates the upper address bits and, worse, places the lowest 4
bits of the address into the high register. For any ring allocated above
the 64 GB boundary the hardware reads/writes the wrong physical memory,
causing silent data corruption.
Program the registers correctly: the low register takes bits [31:0] and
the high register takes bits [39:32] of the 40-bit DMA address. Replace
the broken FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_* macros with FSL_RE_ADDR_HIGH_MASK.
Fixes: ad80da658bbc ("dmaengine: Driver support for FSL RaidEngine device.")
Assisted-by: opencode:hy3-free
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c | 14 +++++++++-----
drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h | 3 +--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
index befb4bb69d54..7343833b3b34 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
@@ -715,15 +715,19 @@ static int fsl_re_chan_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
goto err_free_1;
}
- /* Program the Inbound/Outbound ring base addresses and size */
+ /* Program the Inbound/Outbound ring base addresses and size.
+ * The DMA rings are 64-bit addresses split into high/low registers.
+ * The driver supports a 40-bit DMA mask, so the low register holds
+ * bits [31:0] and the high register holds bits [39:32].
+ */
out_be32(&chan->jrregs->inbring_base_h,
- chan->inb_phys_addr & FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_MASK);
+ upper_32_bits(chan->inb_phys_addr) & FSL_RE_ADDR_HIGH_MASK);
out_be32(&chan->jrregs->oubring_base_h,
- chan->oub_phys_addr & FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_MASK);
+ upper_32_bits(chan->oub_phys_addr) & FSL_RE_ADDR_HIGH_MASK);
out_be32(&chan->jrregs->inbring_base_l,
- chan->inb_phys_addr >> FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_SHIFT);
+ lower_32_bits(chan->inb_phys_addr));
out_be32(&chan->jrregs->oubring_base_l,
- chan->oub_phys_addr >> FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_SHIFT);
+ lower_32_bits(chan->oub_phys_addr));
out_be32(&chan->jrregs->inbring_size,
FSL_RE_RING_SIZE << FSL_RE_RING_SIZE_SHIFT);
out_be32(&chan->jrregs->oubring_size,
diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h
index adbfede330a7..748047996bbc 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h
+++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h
@@ -66,8 +66,7 @@
#define FSL_RE_RING_SIZE 0x400
#define FSL_RE_RING_SIZE_MASK (FSL_RE_RING_SIZE - 1)
#define FSL_RE_RING_SIZE_SHIFT 8
-#define FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_SHIFT 4
-#define FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_MASK (BIT(FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_SHIFT) - 1)
+#define FSL_RE_ADDR_HIGH_MASK 0xFF
#define FSL_RE_ERROR 0x40000000
#define FSL_RE_INTR 0x80000000
#define FSL_RE_CLR_INTR 0x80000000
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: fsl_raid: fix 64-bit ring base address programming
2026-09-10 20:17 [PATCH] dmaengine: fsl_raid: fix 64-bit ring base address programming Rosen Penev
@ 2026-09-11 15:42 ` Frank Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2026-09-11 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rosen Penev
Cc: dmaengine, Vinod Koul, Frank Li, Xuelin Shi, Harninder Rai, open list
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 01:17:17PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> The driver claims a 40-bit DMA mask via dma_set_mask(40), but the
> inbound/outbound ring base addresses were programmed by masking the
> physical address with FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_MASK (0xF) into the high register
> and shifting it right by FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_SHIFT (4) into the low register.
This IP is too old, which only use by power pc. I supposed you have not
hardware to test. Maybw 40-bit DMA mask is wrong, only support 36bits.
And hardware base_l hold 36:4 base_h hold:3:0,
I supposed this driver is tested when upstream. this change may block
function unless you or someone can run test at real hardware.
Frank
>
> This truncates the upper address bits and, worse, places the lowest 4
> bits of the address into the high register. For any ring allocated above
> the 64 GB boundary the hardware reads/writes the wrong physical memory,
> causing silent data corruption.
>
> Program the registers correctly: the low register takes bits [31:0] and
> the high register takes bits [39:32] of the 40-bit DMA address. Replace
> the broken FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_* macros with FSL_RE_ADDR_HIGH_MASK.
>
> Fixes: ad80da658bbc ("dmaengine: Driver support for FSL RaidEngine device.")
> Assisted-by: opencode:hy3-free
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> index befb4bb69d54..7343833b3b34 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> @@ -715,15 +715,19 @@ static int fsl_re_chan_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> goto err_free_1;
> }
>
> - /* Program the Inbound/Outbound ring base addresses and size */
> + /* Program the Inbound/Outbound ring base addresses and size.
> + * The DMA rings are 64-bit addresses split into high/low registers.
> + * The driver supports a 40-bit DMA mask, so the low register holds
> + * bits [31:0] and the high register holds bits [39:32].
> + */
> out_be32(&chan->jrregs->inbring_base_h,
> - chan->inb_phys_addr & FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_MASK);
> + upper_32_bits(chan->inb_phys_addr) & FSL_RE_ADDR_HIGH_MASK);
> out_be32(&chan->jrregs->oubring_base_h,
> - chan->oub_phys_addr & FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_MASK);
> + upper_32_bits(chan->oub_phys_addr) & FSL_RE_ADDR_HIGH_MASK);
> out_be32(&chan->jrregs->inbring_base_l,
> - chan->inb_phys_addr >> FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_SHIFT);
> + lower_32_bits(chan->inb_phys_addr));
> out_be32(&chan->jrregs->oubring_base_l,
> - chan->oub_phys_addr >> FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_SHIFT);
> + lower_32_bits(chan->oub_phys_addr));
> out_be32(&chan->jrregs->inbring_size,
> FSL_RE_RING_SIZE << FSL_RE_RING_SIZE_SHIFT);
> out_be32(&chan->jrregs->oubring_size,
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h
> index adbfede330a7..748047996bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h
> @@ -66,8 +66,7 @@
> #define FSL_RE_RING_SIZE 0x400
> #define FSL_RE_RING_SIZE_MASK (FSL_RE_RING_SIZE - 1)
> #define FSL_RE_RING_SIZE_SHIFT 8
> -#define FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_SHIFT 4
> -#define FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_MASK (BIT(FSL_RE_ADDR_BIT_SHIFT) - 1)
> +#define FSL_RE_ADDR_HIGH_MASK 0xFF
> #define FSL_RE_ERROR 0x40000000
> #define FSL_RE_INTR 0x80000000
> #define FSL_RE_CLR_INTR 0x80000000
> --
> 2.55.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-11 15:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-10 20:17 [PATCH] dmaengine: fsl_raid: fix 64-bit ring base address programming Rosen Penev
2026-09-11 15:42 ` Frank Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®