* [PATCH] dlm: fix RCOM_LOOKUP length underflow
@ 2026-09-11 6:53 Aohan Mei
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Aohan Mei @ 2026-09-11 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gfs2
Cc: aahringo, teigland, linux-kernel, Aohan Mei, TencentOS Corvus AI, stable
From: Aohan Mei <henrymei@tencent.com>
receive_rcom_lookup() derives the resource name length from the
peer-supplied 16-bit h_length header field:
int len = le16_to_cpu(rc_in->rc_header.h_length) -
sizeof(struct dlm_rcom);
The 3.1 receive path only bounds h_length to the range
[sizeof(struct dlm_header), DLM_MAX_SOCKET_BUFSIZE] in
dlm_validate_incoming_buffer(), and the RCOM case in
dlm_midcomms_receive_buffer_3_1() performs no further length check
despite its "length already checked" comment. A peer can therefore
send an RCOM_LOOKUP message whose h_length is smaller than
sizeof(struct dlm_rcom) (48). The subtraction is evaluated in size_t
arithmetic and wraps, and the result is assigned to an int as a
negative value.
Both consumers of that length only guard the upper bound
(len > DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN), which a negative len passes as a signed
comparison:
- with rc_id == 0xffffffff, len reaches dlm_dump_rsb_name() ->
dlm_search_rsb_tree(), where memcpy() converts it to a huge size_t
and overflows the on-stack 64-byte key buffer;
- otherwise len reaches dlm_master_lookup() -> _dlm_master_lookup(),
where jhash() converts it to a huge u32 and reads out of bounds.
Drop the message when the computed name length falls outside
[0, DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN], which is exactly the range valid lookups
use.
Fixes: e7fd41792fc0 ("[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM")
Reported-by: TencentOS Corvus AI <corvus@tencent.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: CodeBuddy:Kimi-K3
Signed-off-by: Aohan Mei <henrymei@tencent.com>
---
fs/dlm/rcom.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/rcom.c b/fs/dlm/rcom.c
index be1a71a6303a..14d5ab658f60 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/rcom.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/rcom.c
@@ -385,6 +385,9 @@ static void receive_rcom_lookup(struct dlm_ls *ls,
int len = le16_to_cpu(rc_in->rc_header.h_length) -
sizeof(struct dlm_rcom);
+ if (len < 0 || len > DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN)
+ return;
+
/* Old code would send this special id to trigger a debug dump. */
if (rc_in->rc_id == cpu_to_le64(0xFFFFFFFF)) {
log_error(ls, "receive_rcom_lookup dump from %d", nodeid);
--
2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [PATCH] dlm: fix RCOM_LOOKUP length underflow
@ 2026-08-21 2:28 Aohan Mei
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Aohan Mei @ 2026-08-21 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gfs2
Cc: aahringo, teigland, linux-kernel, Aohan Mei, TencentOS Corvus AI, stable
From: Aohan Mei <henrymei@tencent.com>
receive_rcom_lookup() derives the resource name length from the
peer-supplied 16-bit h_length header field:
int len = le16_to_cpu(rc_in->rc_header.h_length) -
sizeof(struct dlm_rcom);
The 3.1 receive path only bounds h_length to the range
[sizeof(struct dlm_header), DLM_MAX_SOCKET_BUFSIZE] in
dlm_validate_incoming_buffer(), and the RCOM case in
dlm_midcomms_receive_buffer_3_1() performs no further length check
despite its "length already checked" comment. A peer can therefore
send an RCOM_LOOKUP message whose h_length is smaller than
sizeof(struct dlm_rcom) (48). The subtraction is evaluated in size_t
arithmetic and wraps, and the result is assigned to an int as a
negative value.
Both consumers of that length only guard the upper bound
(len > DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN), which a negative len passes as a signed
comparison:
- with rc_id == 0xffffffff, len reaches dlm_dump_rsb_name() ->
dlm_search_rsb_tree(), where memcpy() converts it to a huge size_t
and overflows the on-stack 64-byte key buffer;
- otherwise len reaches dlm_master_lookup() -> _dlm_master_lookup(),
where jhash() converts it to a huge u32 and reads out of bounds.
Drop the message when the computed name length falls outside
[0, DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN], which is exactly the range valid lookups
use.
Fixes: e7fd41792fc0 ("[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM")
Reported-by: TencentOS Corvus AI <corvus@tencent.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: CodeBuddy:Kimi-K3
Signed-off-by: Aohan Mei <henrymei@tencent.com>
---
fs/dlm/rcom.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/rcom.c b/fs/dlm/rcom.c
index be1a71a6303a..14d5ab658f60 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/rcom.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/rcom.c
@@ -385,6 +385,9 @@ static void receive_rcom_lookup(struct dlm_ls *ls,
int len = le16_to_cpu(rc_in->rc_header.h_length) -
sizeof(struct dlm_rcom);
+ if (len < 0 || len > DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN)
+ return;
+
/* Old code would send this special id to trigger a debug dump. */
if (rc_in->rc_id == cpu_to_le64(0xFFFFFFFF)) {
log_error(ls, "receive_rcom_lookup dump from %d", nodeid);
--
2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-11 6:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-11 6:53 [PATCH] dlm: fix RCOM_LOOKUP length underflow Aohan Mei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-21 2:28 Aohan Mei
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®