From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: avoid recalculating curr status in place_entity() and requeue_delayed_entity()
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:42:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911124256.GZ776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60fd4fc5d17b706766a428b63760d1f69e6d11bb.1787737648.git.kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 01:15:42PM +0300, Kayra Cizmeci wrote:
> In enqueue_task_fair() a bool is calculated by cfs_rq->curr == se.
> But this information gets recalculated on requeue_delayed_entity() and
> requeue_delayed_entity() only gets called in enqueue_task_fair().
> And on place_entity() if se == curr we call the avg_vruntime_weight()
> twice with the same input. place_entity() only gets called in
> enqueue_task_fair() and requeue_delayed_entity().
I found it very hard to follow your Changelog. Could be my Friday brain.
Sorry if I misunderstood.
> @@ -8000,9 +8007,10 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> util_est_enqueue(cfs_rq, p);
>
> update_curr_eevdf(cfs_rq);
> + curr = (cfs_rq->curr == se);
>
> if (delayed) {
> - requeue_delayed_entity(cfs_rq, se);
> + requeue_delayed_entity(cfs_rq, se, curr);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -8017,18 +8025,18 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> /*
> * XXX comment on the curr thing
> */
> - curr = (cfs_rq->curr == se);
> +
> if (curr)
> - place_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
> + place_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags, curr);
As I argued here:
https://patch.msgid.link/20260813103155.GC1246887%40noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
I suspect that case is impossible. Which AFAICT renders your whole patch
one big no-op, no?
That is, I think we want to do the below.
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 +++-------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 4d0b94465d19..3c7fb0684a76 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7996,7 +7996,6 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
unsigned long weight;
- bool curr;
if (task_is_throttled(p) && enqueue_throttled_task(p))
return;
@@ -8025,23 +8024,14 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
if (p->in_iowait)
cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT);
- /*
- * XXX comment on the curr thing
- */
- curr = (cfs_rq->curr == se);
- if (curr)
- place_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
if (se->on_rq && se->sched_delayed)
requeue_delayed_entity(cfs_rq, se);
weight = enqueue_hierarchy(p, flags);
-
- if (!curr) {
- reweight_eevdf(cfs_rq, se, weight, false);
- place_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags | ENQUEUE_QUEUED);
- __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
- }
+ reweight_eevdf(cfs_rq, se, weight, false);
+ place_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags | ENQUEUE_QUEUED);
+ __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
if (!rq_h_nr_queued && rq->cfs.h_nr_queued)
dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 12:52 [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: reuse the ENQUEUE_DELAYED calculation in enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-24 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: avoid recalculating curr status in place_entity() and requeue_delayed_entity() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/fair: reduce repeated work in enqueue path Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: reuse the ENQUEUE_DELAYED calculation in enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:41 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 18:44 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-07 16:05 ` [PATCH] sched/fair: Remove unused autogroup.h include Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-07 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: reuse the ENQUEUE_DELAYED calculation in enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: avoid recalculating curr status in place_entity() and requeue_delayed_entity() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 10:57 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 12:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-11 13:10 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-09-11 14:08 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 16:02 ` [PATCH v3] sched/fair: remove dead code on enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911124256.GZ776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®