From: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: bsegall@google.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, kayracizmeci@gmail.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: avoid recalculating curr status in place_entity() and requeue_delayed_entity()
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:08:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911140824.1248362-1-kayracizmeci@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911124256.GZ776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hello Peter :>,
>> In enqueue_task_fair() a bool is calculated by cfs_rq->curr == se.
>> But this information gets recalculated on requeue_delayed_entity() and
>> requeue_delayed_entity() only gets called in enqueue_task_fair().
>> And on place_entity() if se == curr we call the avg_vruntime_weight()
>> twice with the same input. place_entity() only gets called in
>> enqueue_task_fair() and requeue_delayed_entity().
> I found it very hard to follow your Changelog. Could be my Friday brain.
> Sorry if I misunderstood.
It's not your Friday brain, it's my talking skills ;>.
> As I argued here:
> https://patch.msgid.link/20260813103155.GC1246887%40noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Oh, I remembered that patch. 1 month ago. But I didn't look into it in detail at the time.
> I suspect that case is impossible. Which AFAICT renders your whole patch
> one big no-op, no?
Well, I run some tests with WARN_ON_ONCE and that case never worked. Atleast on my tests and on my machine. I didn't done so many tests tho.
I remember doing some WARN_ON_ONCE tests on v1 too. But I don't think I did
a test about curr == se, since I thought there was no way that it does not work. Well... :P.
> That is, I think we want to do the below.
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 +++-------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 4d0b94465d19..3c7fb0684a76 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7996,7 +7996,6 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
> unsigned long weight;
> - bool curr;
>
> if (task_is_throttled(p) && enqueue_throttled_task(p))
> return;
> @@ -8025,23 +8024,14 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> if (p->in_iowait)
> cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT);
>
> - /*
> - * XXX comment on the curr thing
> - */
> - curr = (cfs_rq->curr == se);
> - if (curr)
> - place_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
>
> if (se->on_rq && se->sched_delayed)
> requeue_delayed_entity(cfs_rq, se);
>
> weight = enqueue_hierarchy(p, flags);
> -
> - if (!curr) {
> - reweight_eevdf(cfs_rq, se, weight, false);
> - place_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags | ENQUEUE_QUEUED);
> - __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
> - }
> + reweight_eevdf(cfs_rq, se, weight, false);
> + place_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags | ENQUEUE_QUEUED);
> + __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
if (!rq_h_nr_queued && rq->cfs.h_nr_queued)
dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);
So, you say remove all of this curr crap and get everything in one place since the
curr = (cfs_rq->curr == se) returns false all the time? That way we wouldn't need to
worry about the place_entity() parts neither. I'm OK. I'll send the v3 today or tommorow
latest.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 12:52 [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: reuse the ENQUEUE_DELAYED calculation in enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-24 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: avoid recalculating curr status in place_entity() and requeue_delayed_entity() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/fair: reduce repeated work in enqueue path Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: reuse the ENQUEUE_DELAYED calculation in enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:41 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 18:44 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-07 16:05 ` [PATCH] sched/fair: Remove unused autogroup.h include Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-07 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: reuse the ENQUEUE_DELAYED calculation in enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: avoid recalculating curr status in place_entity() and requeue_delayed_entity() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 10:57 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 12:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-11 13:10 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-11 14:08 ` Kayra Cizmeci [this message]
2026-09-11 16:02 ` [PATCH v3] sched/fair: remove dead code on enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911140824.1248362-1-kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--to=kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®