mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>, phasta@kernel.org
Cc: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Stanner <phasta@mailbox.org>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
	Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drm/sched: run queues freed before the TDR that drm_sched_fini() waits for
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 10:48:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260912014812.2115452-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <363aa83e-7c72-4592-a8ca-46f0ab56e4c5@amd.com>

On 9/10/26 15:58, Christian König wrote:
> That is a really good point, canceling the timeout handler should indeed
> happen before freeing the runqueues.

Posted, in a separate thread:

  https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260910121601.805032-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com/

> Oh, that is completely broken behavior of the KUnit test case. I suggest to
> fix that as well.

Agreed - it never signals the hardware fence, on purpose, only to find out
whether the sequence was reachable at all. A local probe, not something
meant for the tree.

Regards,
Donggeun

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-12  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10  5:46 Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-10  6:52 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-10  7:04   ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-10  7:32   ` Christian König
2026-09-10  8:44     ` Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-10  8:51       ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-10  9:50         ` Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-10 11:04           ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-10 13:58       ` Christian König
2026-09-12  1:48         ` Donggeun Yoo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260912014812.2115452-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com \
    --to=donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltuikov89@gmail.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=phasta@mailbox.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®