mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@mailbox.org>
To: "Donggeun Yoo" <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	phasta@kernel.org
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
	Luben Tuikov	 <ltuikov89@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drm/sched: run queues freed before the TDR that drm_sched_fini() waits for
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 13:04:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f47c44133a976532c0831816f776a879dbf3963a.camel@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910095053.727808-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2026-09-10 at 18:50 +0900, Donggeun Yoo wrote:
> On 9/10/26 10:51, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > Which KUnit test case exactly?
> 
> A local one. It is not in the tree - I wrote it for this, which is why you
> could not find it. I should have said that explicitly.

OK. For the future please provide the reproducer somehow, for example
through a repo link.

> 
> It is a mock scheduler whose run_job() returns a hardware fence that is
> never signaled,

Alright, so as we agreed on that's then not a bug fix relevant for
upstream.

> 
> Right, that's what my patch does: drm_sched_wqueue_stop(), then
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sched->work_tdr), then the frees. The report is
> gone and nothing else in the suite fails.
> 
> As you say, that is closer to a cleanup - or to making the teardown order
> state its intent - than to a fix. Do you still want the reordering patch?

I think it's a good idea. I'd move the deallocations above the related
kfree at the bottom.


What would be more valuable, though, would be a hint in the docu that
the hardware fences must have been signaled before drm_sched_fini() is
called. I thought we had sth like that, but apparently we don't.

@Christian: Could you address this here [1]?


Thanks
P.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260909131808.2201-3-christian.koenig@amd.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10  5:46 Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-10  6:52 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-10  7:04   ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-10  7:32   ` Christian König
2026-09-10  8:44     ` Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-10  8:51       ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-10  9:50         ` Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-10 11:04           ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
2026-09-10 13:58       ` Christian König
2026-09-12  1:48         ` Donggeun Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f47c44133a976532c0831816f776a879dbf3963a.camel@mailbox.org \
    --to=phasta@mailbox.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltuikov89@gmail.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®