* [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Check the mandatory SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES queries
2026-09-14 12:58 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Report SMCCC_VERSION and SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES as implemented Fuad Tabba
@ 2026-09-14 12:58 ` Fuad Tabba
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fuad Tabba @ 2026-09-14 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier, Oliver Upton
Cc: Fuad Tabba, Fuad Tabba, Joey Gouly, Steffen Eiden,
Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon,
Mark Rutland, linux-arm-kernel, kvmarm, linux-kernel
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/hypercalls.c checks SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES
with two expectations: hvc_info[] expects NOT_SUPPORTED with the
pseudo-firmware bitmaps cleared and something else with them set, and
false_hvc_info[] expects NOT_SUPPORTED for mismatched pairs. DEN0028H
7.3.6 mandates SUCCESS for arch_func_id SMCCC_VERSION and
SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES itself, whatever the bitmaps hold, which neither
expectation allows.
Check those two in the feature-disabled and feature-enabled stages, so
the answer is asserted with the bitmaps cleared and again at their reset
values. They pass only with the preceding patch applied.
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
---
.../testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/hypercalls.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/hypercalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/hypercalls.c
index 5d96cdf382c47..e74410cef0fe0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/hypercalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/hypercalls.c
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@
* via the psuedo-firmware bitmap register. This includes the registers'
* read/write behavior before and after the VM has started, and if the
* hypercalls are properly masked or unmasked to the guest when disabled or
- * enabled from the KVM userspace, respectively.
+ * enabled from the KVM userspace, respectively. It also checks the two
+ * SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES queries whose answer SMCCC pins to SUCCESS.
*/
#include <errno.h>
#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
@@ -97,6 +98,12 @@ static const struct test_hvc_info false_hvc_info[] = {
TEST_HVC_INFO(ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_FEATURES, ARM_SMCCC_TRNG_RND64),
};
+/* SMCCC pins the answer to SUCCESS, whatever the bitmaps hold. */
+static const struct test_hvc_info always_hvc_info[] = {
+ TEST_HVC_INFO(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID),
+ TEST_HVC_INFO(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID),
+};
+
static void guest_test_hvc(const struct test_hvc_info *hc_info)
{
unsigned int i;
@@ -128,6 +135,23 @@ static void guest_test_hvc(const struct test_hvc_info *hc_info)
}
}
+static void guest_test_always_hvc(void)
+{
+ struct arm_smccc_res res;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(always_hvc_info); i++) {
+ memset(&res, 0, sizeof(res));
+ do_smccc(always_hvc_info[i].func_id, always_hvc_info[i].arg1,
+ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
+
+ __GUEST_ASSERT(res.a0 == SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS,
+ "a0 = 0x%lx, func_id = 0x%x, arg1 = 0x%lx, stage = %u",
+ res.a0, always_hvc_info[i].func_id,
+ always_hvc_info[i].arg1, stage);
+ }
+}
+
static void guest_code(void)
{
while (stage != TEST_STAGE_END) {
@@ -137,6 +161,7 @@ static void guest_code(void)
case TEST_STAGE_HVC_IFACE_FEAT_DISABLED:
case TEST_STAGE_HVC_IFACE_FEAT_ENABLED:
guest_test_hvc(hvc_info);
+ guest_test_always_hvc();
break;
case TEST_STAGE_HVC_IFACE_FALSE_INFO:
guest_test_hvc(false_hvc_info);
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread