From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jean-Christophe Guillain" <jean-christophe@guillain.net>,
"Paweł S" <spawel523@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: Serialize vCPU creation and revert vcpu_ids tracking
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:12:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914181223.289061-1-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
Serialize vCPU creation by holding kvm->lock for the entirety of
kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(), and then revert the now-redundant tracking adding
by commit 97d65b544f48 ("KVM: Check for duplicate vcpu_id as early as
possible"). I botched the math when justifying the vcpu_ids tracking; it's not
an extra 256 bytes, it's an extra 2048 bytes. Roughly doubling the size of
"struct kvm" tripped x86's KVM_SANITY_CHECK_VM_STRUCT_SIZE, and obviously isn't
something we want to do in general.
The TL;DR of why it's a-ok to serialize vCPU creation is that no VMM actually
does parallel vCPU creation. As with so many things, KVM's current behavior is
the result of decades-old cruft, not intentional, deliberate design.
Patch 1 is a tangentially related bug fix; I included it here because holding
kvm->lock for all of vCPU creation allows WARNing if KVM attempts to lock all
vCPUs if vCPU creation is in-progress (the caller is must hold kvm->lock).
Sean Christopherson (5):
KVM: Reject attempts to lock all vCPUs if vCPU creation is in-progress
KVM: Protect all of kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu() with kvm->lock
KVM: Move check for existing vCPU ID to the top of vCPU creation
Revert "KVM: Check for duplicate vcpu_id as early as possible"
KVM: WARN if vCPU creation is in-progress when locking all vCPUs
arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 10 ----------
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 5 -----
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 -
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 35 +++++++++++------------------------
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
base-commit: d599822bdb66aeec5ec76297b0fc6efaaeefe07c
--
2.55.0.1032.g73a4cd73de-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 18:12 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-09-14 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: Reject attempts to lock all vCPUs if vCPU creation is in-progress Sean Christopherson
2026-09-14 18:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: Protect all of kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu() with kvm->lock Sean Christopherson
2026-09-14 18:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: Move check for existing vCPU ID to the top of vCPU creation Sean Christopherson
2026-09-14 18:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] Revert "KVM: Check for duplicate vcpu_id as early as possible" Sean Christopherson
2026-09-14 18:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: WARN if vCPU creation is in-progress when locking all vCPUs Sean Christopherson
2026-09-14 18:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: Serialize vCPU creation and revert vcpu_ids tracking Christian Borntraeger
2026-09-15 13:13 ` Jean-Christophe Guillain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260914181223.289061-1-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jean-christophe@guillain.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=spawel523@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®