From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jean-Christophe Guillain" <jean-christophe@guillain.net>,
"Paweł S" <spawel523@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: WARN if vCPU creation is in-progress when locking all vCPUs
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:12:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914181223.289061-6-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914181223.289061-1-seanjc@google.com>
Now that KVM holds kvm->lock for the entirety of vCPU creation, from when
created_vcpus is incremented until the new vCPU is fully onlined, WARN if
the impossible happens and KVM somehow sees a discrepancy between the
number of vCPUs "created" and "onlined".
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 985af39b980a..e66d9761ee49 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ int kvm_trylock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->lock);
- if (kvm_is_vcpu_creation_in_progress(kvm))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_is_vcpu_creation_in_progress(kvm)))
return -EBUSY;
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
@@ -1389,7 +1389,7 @@ int kvm_lock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->lock);
- if (kvm_is_vcpu_creation_in_progress(kvm))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_is_vcpu_creation_in_progress(kvm)))
return -EBUSY;
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
--
2.55.0.1032.g73a4cd73de-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 18:12 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: Serialize vCPU creation and revert vcpu_ids tracking Sean Christopherson
2026-09-14 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: Reject attempts to lock all vCPUs if vCPU creation is in-progress Sean Christopherson
2026-09-14 18:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: Protect all of kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu() with kvm->lock Sean Christopherson
2026-09-14 18:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: Move check for existing vCPU ID to the top of vCPU creation Sean Christopherson
2026-09-14 18:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] Revert "KVM: Check for duplicate vcpu_id as early as possible" Sean Christopherson
2026-09-14 18:12 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-09-14 18:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: Serialize vCPU creation and revert vcpu_ids tracking Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260914181223.289061-6-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jean-christophe@guillain.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=spawel523@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®