* [PATCH] sysctl: drop the pointer dance in proc_put_char()
@ 2026-08-22 18:42 Bradley Morgan
2026-09-16 11:46 ` Joel Granados
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bradley Morgan @ 2026-08-22 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Granados; +Cc: Kees Cook, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, include
proc_put_char() still drags around a char **buffer alias, writing
the char through it, advancing it, then copying it back into the
slot it was loaded from. That only made sense when the buffer was
__user and the char went through put_user() (which could fail).
Since commit 32927393dc1c ("sysctl: pass kernel pointers to
->proc_handler") the buffer is just a kernel pointer, so the alias
is dead weight. proc_put_long() and the skip helpers already advance
*buf directly, so do the same here. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>
---
kernel/sysctl.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index f7b7598..2b92b30 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -350,12 +350,9 @@ static void proc_put_long(void **buf, size_t *size, unsigned long val, bool neg)
static void proc_put_char(void **buf, size_t *size, char c)
{
if (*size) {
- char **buffer = (char **)buf;
- **buffer = c;
-
+ *(char *)*buf = c;
(*size)--;
- (*buffer)++;
- *buf = *buffer;
+ (*buf)++;
}
}
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sysctl: drop the pointer dance in proc_put_char()
2026-08-22 18:42 [PATCH] sysctl: drop the pointer dance in proc_put_char() Bradley Morgan
@ 2026-09-16 11:46 ` Joel Granados
2026-09-16 12:47 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Granados @ 2026-09-16 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bradley Morgan; +Cc: Kees Cook, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1426 bytes --]
On Sat, Aug 22, 2026 at 06:42:44PM +0000, Bradley Morgan wrote:
> proc_put_char() still drags around a char **buffer alias, writing
> the char through it, advancing it, then copying it back into the
> slot it was loaded from. That only made sense when the buffer was
> __user and the char went through put_user() (which could fail).
>
> Since commit 32927393dc1c ("sysctl: pass kernel pointers to
> ->proc_handler") the buffer is just a kernel pointer, so the alias
> is dead weight. proc_put_long() and the skip helpers already advance
> *buf directly, so do the same here. No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>
> ---
> kernel/sysctl.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index f7b7598..2b92b30 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -350,12 +350,9 @@ static void proc_put_long(void **buf, size_t *size, unsigned long val, bool neg)
> static void proc_put_char(void **buf, size_t *size, char c)
> {
> if (*size) {
> - char **buffer = (char **)buf;
> - **buffer = c;
> -
> + *(char *)*buf = c;
> (*size)--;
> - (*buffer)++;
> - *buf = *buffer;
> + (*buf)++;
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
I was thinking more along these lines https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260916-lklm-sysctl-void-vs-char-v1-1-c3f8b2eb8b1e@kernel.org/
Best
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sysctl: drop the pointer dance in proc_put_char()
2026-09-16 11:46 ` Joel Granados
@ 2026-09-16 12:47 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2026-09-16 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Granados; +Cc: Bradley Morgan, Kees Cook, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
On Wed, 16 Sep 2026 13:46:40 +0200
Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2026 at 06:42:44PM +0000, Bradley Morgan wrote:
> > proc_put_char() still drags around a char **buffer alias, writing
> > the char through it, advancing it, then copying it back into the
> > slot it was loaded from. That only made sense when the buffer was
> > __user and the char went through put_user() (which could fail).
> >
> > Since commit 32927393dc1c ("sysctl: pass kernel pointers to
> > ->proc_handler") the buffer is just a kernel pointer, so the alias
> > is dead weight. proc_put_long() and the skip helpers already advance
> > *buf directly, so do the same here. No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>
> > ---
> > kernel/sysctl.c | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> > index f7b7598..2b92b30 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> > @@ -350,12 +350,9 @@ static void proc_put_long(void **buf, size_t *size, unsigned long val, bool neg)
> > static void proc_put_char(void **buf, size_t *size, char c)
> > {
> > if (*size) {
> > - char **buffer = (char **)buf;
> > - **buffer = c;
> > -
> > + *(char *)*buf = c;
> > (*size)--;
> > - (*buffer)++;
> > - *buf = *buffer;
> > + (*buf)++;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.47.3
> >
>
> I was thinking more along these lines https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260916-lklm-sysctl-void-vs-char-v1-1-c3f8b2eb8b1e@kernel.org/
I think I'd decrement *size before writing to buf.
Should ensure the compiler never reloads *size.
Could also be worth an __always_inline - likely to make the code smaller.
David
>
> Best
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-16 12:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-22 18:42 [PATCH] sysctl: drop the pointer dance in proc_put_char() Bradley Morgan
2026-09-16 11:46 ` Joel Granados
2026-09-16 12:47 ` David Laight
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®