From: Stian Halseth <stian@itx.no>
To: brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
schwab@suse.de, fweimer@redhat.com, Stian Halseth <stian@itx.no>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] fs: honor FOP_UNSIGNED_OFFSET in llseek and positional I/O
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 17:16:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917151614.376867-1-stian@itx.no> (raw)
Two generic VFS bugs found while fixing pldd(1) on sparc64, where
userspace is mapped above 2^63 so file positions on /proc/PID/mem have
the top bit set.
FOP_UNSIGNED_OFFSET declares a file's offsets unsigned, and vfs_llseek(),
rw_verify_area() and the mmap path honor it. Two sets of syscall
wrappers do not:
1. sys_llseek() takes a negative result from vfs_llseek() for an error
and returns it truncated to int without filling *result.
2. pread64/pwrite64/preadv/pwritev reject a negative position before
looking up the file.
Both patches only change behavior for a file with FOP_UNSIGNED_OFFSET
and a position with the top bit set. Today that is /proc/PID/mem,
/dev/mem, the sparc ADI driver and the DRM/accel device files; for all
of them lseek() followed by read() at that position already works, so
the wrappers now match it.
Tested on an UltraSPARC T4: pread(), preadv(), pwrite(), pwritev() and
lseek() on /proc/PID/mem at positions above 2^63 return the correct data
and offset; a negative position on a regular file or a pipe still fails
with EINVAL and position 0 on a pipe with ESPIPE, as before; and the
stock pldd(1) works again. On other architectures the change is a no-op
for every file without FOP_UNSIGNED_OFFSET, and userspace addresses
never set the top bit, so the new paths are only reachable by passing
a bogus position to /proc/PID/mem or /dev/mem, which then fails in the
driver instead of the wrapper.
The glibc side is https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34641;
Stian Halseth (2):
fs: fix llseek() result for files with unsigned offsets
fs: allow positional I/O on files with unsigned offsets
fs/read_write.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 15:16 Stian Halseth [this message]
2026-09-17 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: fix llseek() result for files with unsigned offsets Stian Halseth
2026-09-17 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: allow positional I/O on " Stian Halseth
2026-09-17 16:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] fs: honor FOP_UNSIGNED_OFFSET in llseek and positional I/O Florian Weimer
2026-09-17 16:45 ` Stian Halseth
2026-09-17 18:39 ` Stian Halseth
2026-10-18 9:33 ` Stian Halseth
2026-10-21 10:37 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917151614.376867-1-stian@itx.no \
--to=stian@itx.no \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®