From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Stian Halseth <stian@itx.no>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, schwab@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fs: honor FOP_UNSIGNED_OFFSET in llseek and positional I/O
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 18:01:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lhuo6dv50l2.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917151614.376867-1-stian@itx.no> (Stian Halseth's message of "Thu, 17 Sep 2026 17:16:12 +0200")
* Stian Halseth:
> Tested on an UltraSPARC T4: pread(), preadv(), pwrite(), pwritev() and
> lseek() on /proc/PID/mem at positions above 2^63 return the correct data
> and offset; a negative position on a regular file or a pipe still fails
> with EINVAL and position 0 on a pipe with ESPIPE, as before; and the
> stock pldd(1) works again. On other architectures the change is a no-op
> for every file without FOP_UNSIGNED_OFFSET, and userspace addresses
> never set the top bit, so the new paths are only reachable by passing
> a bogus position to /proc/PID/mem or /dev/mem, which then fails in the
> driver instead of the wrapper.
For lseek, aren't some file offsets (the top 4095 bytes or so just
before 2**64) ambiguous as error indicators? You would have to use
_llseek when accessing /proc/PID/mem.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 15:16 Stian Halseth
2026-09-17 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: fix llseek() result for files with unsigned offsets Stian Halseth
2026-09-17 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: allow positional I/O on " Stian Halseth
2026-09-17 16:01 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2026-09-17 16:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] fs: honor FOP_UNSIGNED_OFFSET in llseek and positional I/O Stian Halseth
2026-09-17 18:39 ` Stian Halseth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=lhuo6dv50l2.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stian@itx.no \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®