From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Jihan LIN <linjh22s@gmail.com>,
suleiman@google.com, andrealmeid@igalia.com, bsegall@google.com,
dave@stgolabs.net, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
dvhart@infradead.org, jstultz@google.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
qyousef@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, soolaugust@gmail.com,
ssouhlal@freebsd.org, tglx@kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] futex: Make FUTEX_*_PING use Proxy Execution.
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 17:36:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917153649.GK4121339@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8abf8b0f-38eb-4a25-a40a-57d5439e52e7@amd.com>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 08:09:34PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> On 9/17/2026 6:48 PM, Jihan LIN wrote:
> > [You don't often get email from linjh22s@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> >
> > Hi Suleiman,
> >
> > Thanks for your RFC series.
> >
> >> diff --git a/kernel/futex/ping.c b/kernel/futex/ping.c
> >> index ebcd3c4a7793..689f149f7150 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/futex/ping.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/futex/ping.c
> >> @@ -370,6 +370,9 @@ int futex_lock_ping(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time,
> >>
> >> queued = false;
> >> while (1) {
> >> + set_task_blocked_on(current, &q.ping_state->ping_mutex,
> >> + BO_T_PING_FUTEX);
> >> +
> >> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_FREEZABLE);
> >> if (!queued) {
> >>
> >
> > A userspace deadlock seems to turn into a kernel lockup.
> > Consider threads A and B on CPU0, unlocked PING futexes F1 and F2, with
> > the following ordering:
> >
> > A: CAS(F1, gettid(A))
> > B: CAS(F2, gettid(B))
> > A: futex(&F2, FUTEX_LOCK_PING) <-- T1
> > B: futex(&F1, FUTEX_LOCK_PING) <-- T2
> >
> > Since futex_lock_ping_atomic() only checks self-lock, both tasks end
> > up blocked on each other after T2. And task_is_blocked() is true for both
> > tasks, try_to_block_task() would keep them on runqueue with
> > tsk->is_blocked set. So if pick_next_task() picks A or B,
> > find_proxy_task() will stuck walking on A -> B -> A -> ... with rq->lock.
> >
> > Could we handle cycles in find_proxy_task(), or add a chain walk for
> > deadlock detection for FUTEX_LOCK_PING like rtmutex?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260714152220.4046736-1-soolaugust@gmail.com/
Ah yes, that thing. I would suggest to still have a hard-coded limit,
but perhaps in addition to the sequence mark.
Without a hard-coded limit, userspace is free to create chains of
arbitrary length. This should be discouraged :-)
Also, we need to be able to return -EDEADLK to userspace.
Ideally userspace gets to have an extra graph walk on block though, and
not rely on pick time sanity checks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 4:33 [RFC PATCH 00/12] FUTEX_PING: A stealable futex using " Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] sched: Abstract task_struct->blocked_on by locking primitive Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] futex: Switch PI futex to use p->pi_futex_lock instead of p->pi_lock Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] futex: Add "ping" parameter to pi_state management functions and export them Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] futex: Introduce stealable PI futex, FUTEX_*_PING Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] futex: Implement exit_ping_state_list() Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] futex: Address aborting from futex_lock_ping() while owning ping_state Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] futex: Make FUTEX_*_PING use Proxy Execution Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 13:18 ` Jihan LIN
2026-09-17 14:39 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-17 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] futex: Implement PING futex handoff Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] futex: Wake up donor in PING futex unlock Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] futex: Optimistic spinning for PING futexes Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] futex: Allow userspace stealing " Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 4:33 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] tools/testing/futex: Add ping_bench, a tool for benchmarking futexes Suleiman Souhlal
2026-09-17 8:58 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] FUTEX_PING: A stealable futex using Proxy Execution Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-17 17:53 ` John Stultz
2026-09-17 18:51 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917153649.GK4121339@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linjh22s@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=qyousef@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=soolaugust@gmail.com \
--cc=ssouhlal@freebsd.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®