mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] tick/nohz: Avoid unused timekeeping_max_deferment() calls
@ 2026-09-17 16:39 Usama Arif
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Usama Arif @ 2026-09-17 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: anna-maria, frederic, linux-kernel, mingo, tglx
  Cc: hannes, shakeel.butt, riel, Usama Arif

tick_nohz_next_event() limits a CPU's sleep interval to the maximum
deferment supported by the current clocksource when that CPU owns the
do_timer() duty. If the duty is unassigned, the limit also applies when
the CPU's TS_FLAG_DO_TIMER_LAST flag is set.

After the early timer checks, the function currently reads the maximum
deferment unconditionally. It then replaces the result with KTIME_MAX
unless one of the two conditions above applies.

timekeeping_max_deferment() performs a seqcount-protected read of the
shared timekeeper and follows its clocksource pointer. Check the do_timer
state first and avoid this work when the result would be discarded. This
leaves the resulting expiry unchanged and reduces accesses to timekeeper
data that is modified regularly.

On x86-64 this removes 18-20 dynamically executed instructions, including
the call, from the common non-owner path when the seqcount does not retry.

Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index c8f2c4a503b08..e7c7c28311156 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -872,18 +872,25 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
 	 * If this CPU is the one which had the do_timer() duty last, we limit
 	 * the sleep time to the timekeeping 'max_deferment' value.
 	 * Otherwise we can sleep as long as we want.
+	 *
+	 * Only read the max deferment in the former case: it is a seqcount
+	 * read of the globally shared timekeeper, and on a large machine
+	 * almost every caller is not the do_timer() CPU and would throw the
+	 * value away.
 	 */
-	delta = timekeeping_max_deferment();
 	tick_cpu = READ_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu);
 	if (tick_cpu != cpu &&
-	    (tick_cpu != TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE || !tick_sched_flag_test(ts, TS_FLAG_DO_TIMER_LAST)))
-		delta = KTIME_MAX;
-
-	/* Calculate the next expiry time */
-	if (delta < (KTIME_MAX - basemono))
-		expires = basemono + delta;
-	else
+	    (tick_cpu != TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE || !tick_sched_flag_test(ts, TS_FLAG_DO_TIMER_LAST))) {
 		expires = KTIME_MAX;
+	} else {
+		delta = timekeeping_max_deferment();
+
+		/* Calculate the next expiry time */
+		if (delta < (KTIME_MAX - basemono))
+			expires = basemono + delta;
+		else
+			expires = KTIME_MAX;
+	}
 
 	ts->timer_expires = min_t(u64, expires, next_tick);
 
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-09-17 16:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-17 16:39 [PATCH] tick/nohz: Avoid unused timekeeping_max_deferment() calls Usama Arif

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®