* [PATCH 0/1] nfc: llcp: reject connect() on sockets not in LLCP_CLOSED state
@ 2026-09-18 3:39 Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-18 3:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Yuchao Zhang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yuchao Zhang @ 2026-09-18 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Heidelberg
Cc: David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, oe-linux-nfc, netdev, linux-kernel, Yuchao Zhang
This patch addresses a socket state validation gap in NFC LLCP socket
connection logic where connect() can be invoked on sockets in the
LLCP_BOUND (or LLCP_LISTEN) state.
Historical background and context:
Earlier patches addressing CVE-2020-25670 / CVE-2020-25673 added an
explicit check for the LLCP_CONNECTING state in llcp_sock_connect() to
prevent duplicate in-flight connection requests on non-blocking sockets
from linking the socket multiple times into local->connecting_sockets.
However, that check implicitly assumed that any socket that was neither
LLCP_CONNECTED nor LLCP_CONNECTING was in LLCP_CLOSED. It omitted the
possibility that a socket had already been bound via llcp_sock_bind(),
which transitions the socket to LLCP_BOUND and adds it to local->sockets.
Vulnerability impact:
When connect() is called on an already bound socket:
1. llcp_sock_connect() overwrites llcp_sock->dev and llcp_sock->local
without dropping the original references, causing refcount and memory
leaks (service_name).
2. The socket is added to local->connecting_sockets while still remaining
linked in local->sockets.
3. Upon receiving connection confirmation (CC), nfc_llcp_recv_cc() unlinks
the socket from connecting_sockets and links it into local->sockets.
Because the head of local->sockets still pointed to the socket itself,
hlist_add_head() links the node to itself (node->next = node), forming
an infinite loop. Subsequent traversals of local->sockets (e.g. during
lookup or release) loop indefinitely under spinlock, leading to kernel
soft-lockups and RCU stalls.
4. If connect() targets a different device index, the socket becomes linked
across two different NFC devices, causing cross-device socket confusion.
Fix:
Enforce that sockets must be in LLCP_CLOSED before initiating a connection,
returning -EBADFD otherwise, aligning with the state check behavior in
llcp_sock_bind() and llcp_raw_sock_bind().
Tested and confirmed style-compliant with checkpatch.pl
(0 errors, 0 warnings).
Yuchao Zhang (1):
nfc: llcp: reject connect() on sockets not in LLCP_CLOSED state
net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] nfc: llcp: reject connect() on sockets not in LLCP_CLOSED state
2026-09-18 3:39 [PATCH 0/1] nfc: llcp: reject connect() on sockets not in LLCP_CLOSED state Yuchao Zhang
@ 2026-09-18 3:39 ` Yuchao Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yuchao Zhang @ 2026-09-18 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Heidelberg
Cc: David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, oe-linux-nfc, netdev, linux-kernel, Yuchao Zhang
When a socket is bound via llcp_sock_bind(), its state transitions to
LLCP_BOUND and it is linked into the local->sockets hlist via
nfc_llcp_sock_link().
Currently, llcp_sock_connect() only checks if the socket is already
connected (LLCP_CONNECTED) or in progress (LLCP_CONNECTING):
if (sk->sk_state == LLCP_CONNECTED) {
ret = -EISCONN;
goto error;
}
if (sk->sk_state == LLCP_CONNECTING) {
ret = -EINPROGRESS;
goto error;
}
Crucially, it does not check for the LLCP_BOUND (or LLCP_LISTEN) state.
Previous fixes addressing CVE-2020-25670 / CVE-2020-25673 added the check
for LLCP_CONNECTING to prevent duplicate in-flight connection attempts
from corrupting the connecting_sockets list. However, they assumed any
other non-connected socket was in LLCP_CLOSED, leaving the LLCP_BOUND
state window unhandled.
If connect() is invoked on a socket that has already been bound:
1. llcp_sock_connect() silently overwrites llcp_sock->dev and
llcp_sock->local without releasing previous references or freeing the
bound service_name, leading to refcount and memory leaks.
2. The socket remains linked in local->sockets, while llcp_sock_connect()
links it again into local->connecting_sockets via nfc_llcp_sock_link().
3. When connection confirmation (CC) arrives, nfc_llcp_recv_cc() executes:
nfc_llcp_sock_unlink(&local->connecting_sockets, sk);
nfc_llcp_sock_link(&local->sockets, sk);
Because sk was never unlinked from local->sockets, the head.first of
local->sockets still points to &sk->sk_node. The second
hlist_add_head() sets sk->sk_node.next = sk->sk_node, producing a
self-referential loop. Subsequent traversals of local->sockets
(e.g. nfc_llcp_sock_get(), nfc_llcp_socket_release()) enter an
infinite loop with spinlocks held, resulting in kernel soft-lockups.
4. Furthermore, if connect() specifies a different NFC device index than
bind(), the socket remains linked on device A's socket list while
being assigned to device B, causing cross-device socket confusion.
Fix this by ensuring that llcp_sock_connect() only accepts sockets in the
LLCP_CLOSED state, returning -EBADFD otherwise, matching the state check
behavior in llcp_sock_bind().
Fixes: d646960f7986 ("NFC: Initial LLCP support")
Signed-off-by: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
---
net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
index 5558d8a4d48b..66f12e9af2fd 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
@@ -689,6 +689,10 @@ static int llcp_sock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *_addr
ret = -EINPROGRESS;
goto error;
}
+ if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_CLOSED) {
+ ret = -EBADFD;
+ goto error;
+ }
dev = nfc_get_device(addr->dev_idx);
if (dev == NULL) {
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-18 3:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-18 3:39 [PATCH 0/1] nfc: llcp: reject connect() on sockets not in LLCP_CLOSED state Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-18 3:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Yuchao Zhang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®