From: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Das Sandipan <Sandipan.Das@amd.com>,
Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@amd.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 01/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Do not map fixed counters >= 3 to generic perf events
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 12:39:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918193937.569414-2-zide.chen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918193937.569414-1-zide.chen@intel.com>
Only fixed counters 0..2 have matching generic cross-platform
hardware perf events (INSTRUCTIONS, CPU_CYCLES, REF_CPU_CYCLES).
Therefore, perf_get_hw_event_config() is only applicable to these
counters.
KVM does not intend to emulate fixed counters >= 3 on legacy
(non-mediated) vPMU, while for mediated vPMU, KVM does not care what
the fixed counter event mappings are. Therefore, return 0 for their
eventsel.
The two BUILD_BUG_ON() checks are no longer needed, so drop them along
with __always_inline.
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
---
v6:
- Re-arrange the code for early return. Clearer.
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 70a8c4816135..11ad64d43e35 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -468,11 +468,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
* different perf_event is already utilizing the requested counter, but the end
* result is the same (ignoring the fact that using a general purpose counter
* will likely exacerbate counter contention).
- *
- * Forcibly inlined to allow asserting on @index at build time, and there should
- * never be more than one user.
*/
-static __always_inline u64 intel_get_fixed_pmc_eventsel(unsigned int index)
+static u64 intel_get_fixed_pmc_eventsel(unsigned int index)
{
const enum perf_hw_id fixed_pmc_perf_ids[] = {
[0] = PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS,
@@ -481,8 +478,13 @@ static __always_inline u64 intel_get_fixed_pmc_eventsel(unsigned int index)
};
u64 eventsel;
- BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(fixed_pmc_perf_ids) != KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_FIXED_COUNTERS);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(index >= KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_FIXED_COUNTERS);
+ /*
+ * Fixed counters 3 and above don't have a corresponding generic
+ * hardware perf event, and KVM does not intend to emulate them on
+ * non-mediated vPMU.
+ */
+ if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE(fixed_pmc_perf_ids))
+ return 0;
/*
* Yell if perf reports support for a fixed counter but perf doesn't
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 19:39 [PATCH v9 00/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Add hardware Topdown metrics support Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` Zide Chen [this message]
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Support Intel fixed counter 3 on mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Rename and move vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() to pmu.h Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Snapshot host IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES in kvm_host Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Move RDPMC emulation into per-vendor callbacks Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Emulate RDPMC on performance metrics Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 08/12] KVM: selftests: Add PERF_METRICS and fixed counter 3 tests Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 09/12] perf/x86: Add INTEL_TD_METRIC_FIELD_{BITS,MASK} constants Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] perf/x86: Expose number of Topdown metric events to KVM Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Reject writes to reserved MSR_PERF_METRICS bits Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Support RDPMC Metrics Clear Mode Zide Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918193937.569414-2-zide.chen@intel.com \
--to=zide.chen@intel.com \
--cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
--cc=Sandipan.Das@amd.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®