mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] md: reject raid_disks >= MD_SB_DISKS in md_set_array_info()
@ 2026-09-19  9:11 Hui Peng
  2026-09-19 11:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Hui Peng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hui Peng @ 2026-09-19  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Song Liu, Yu Kuai; +Cc: Li Nan, Xiao Ni, linux-raid, linux-kernel, Hui Peng

md_set_array_info() copies info->raid_disks straight into
mddev->raid_disks without any upper bound, while also setting
mddev->max_disks to MD_SB_DISKS for persistent arrays. The resulting
mddev is internally inconsistent: raid_disks can be far larger than the
number of devices a v0.90 superblock is able to describe.

super_90_sync() lays the device table out inside the single page that
holds the v0.90 superblock and picks slot numbers starting at
mddev->raid_disks:

	next_spare = mddev->raid_disks;
	...
	desc_nr = next_spare++;
	rdev2->desc_nr = desc_nr;
	d = &sb->disks[rdev2->desc_nr];

sb->disks[] only has MD_SB_DISKS (27) entries, so an
ioctl(SET_ARRAY_INFO) with raid_disks = 1000 followed by any operation
that writes the superblock walks tens of kilobytes past the end of the
superblock page:

 ==================================================================
 BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in super_90_sync+0x1c5e/0x20c0
 Write of size 4 at addr 0xffff888009623c00 by task init/1

 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Tainted: G      D W    7.3.0-rc3-g5dd1818b15d9 #3 PREEMPT(lazy)
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x4d/0x70
  print_report+0x153/0x4c6
  kasan_report+0xda/0x110
  super_90_sync+0x1c5e/0x20c0
  md_update_sb+0x850/0x1e90
  new_level_store+0x11a/0x190
  md_attr_store+0x12f/0x270
  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x323/0x4e0
  vfs_write+0x54f/0xde0
  ksys_write+0xfd/0x200
  do_syscall_64+0xda/0x4b0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
  </TASK>
 ==================================================================

Reject the request before mddev is modified. Non-persistent arrays do
not write a v0.90 superblock, so the MD_SB_DISKS limit is only applied
when info->not_persistent is clear.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
---
No Fixes: tag: the missing check appears to predate the git history I
have available, so I would rather not guess at a commit.

Reproduced on Linux 7.3.0-rc3 (5dd1818b15d9) with KASAN under QEMU:
create an md array over a loop device, issue
ioctl(fd, SET_ARRAY_INFO) with raid_disks = 1000, then write to
/sys/block/md0/md/new_level to force md_update_sb(). With this patch the
ioctl fails with -EINVAL and no splat is produced.

Note that raid_disks_store() has a related but weaker check: it bounds n
against mddev->max_disks, which is still 0 before any superblock has
been loaded. I have deliberately not touched it here, since an
unconditional MD_SB_DISKS limit there would break v1.x arrays with more
than MD_SB_DISKS members. It may deserve a separate fix - input from
the maintainers would be welcome.

 drivers/md/md.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -7926,6 +7926,10 @@ int md_set_array_info(struct mddev *mdde
 		mddev->ctime         = ktime_get_real_seconds();
 		return 0;
 	}
+	if (info->raid_disks <= 0 ||
+	    (!info->not_persistent && info->raid_disks >= MD_SB_DISKS))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	mddev->major_version = MD_MAJOR_VERSION;
 	mddev->minor_version = MD_MINOR_VERSION;
 	mddev->patch_version = MD_PATCHLEVEL_VERSION;
-- 
2.43.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-19 11:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-19  9:11 [PATCH] md: reject raid_disks >= MD_SB_DISKS in md_set_array_info() Hui Peng
2026-09-19 11:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Hui Peng

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®