From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: guodongtai@kylinos.cn, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
yeoreum.yun@arm.com, mclapinski@google.com,
ruirui.yang@linux.dev, eric.devolder@oracle.com,
hbathini@linux.ibm.com, kernel@xen0n.name, piliu@redhat.com,
thuth@redhat.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com, tglx@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
rppt@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, bp@alien8.de,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, bgwin@google.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
chleroy@kernel.org, "Jinjie Ruan" <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
mark.rutland@arm.com, leitao@debian.org, james.morse@arm.com,
maqianga@uniontech.com, rafael@kernel.org, sshegde@linux.ibm.com,
jbouron@amazon.com, me@linux.beauty, pratyush@kernel.org,
palmer@rivosinc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
baoquan.he@linux.dev, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mingo@redhat.com, zhangtianyang@loongson.cn, hpa@zytor.com,
chao.gao@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com, tangyouling@kylinos.cn,
coxu@redhat.com, dakr@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
graf@amazon.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, robh@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com, liukexin@kylinos.cn,
seanjc@google.com, loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/14] arm64: kexec_file: Fix CMA page leaks in segment placement retry loops
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:18:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921091840.C62E51F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921090450.807575-5-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm: kexec_file_load infinite loop due to unconstrained CMA retry
--
commit 897e1cdce0bd14dc7b700f2043c1f14c66a40791
Author: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
arm64: kexec_file: Fix CMA page leaks in segment placement retry loops
This commit fixes a memory leak in the kexec image placement retry loop.
It explicitly releases the associated CMA buffers in the failure paths
before the segment count is reduced.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> index b70f4df15a1ae..ffcb7f9075e62 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ static void *image_load(struct kimage *image,
> * We couldn't find space for the other segments; erase the
> * kernel segment and try the next available hole.
> */
> + kexec_free_segment_cma(image, kernel_segment_number);
> image->nr_segments -= 1;
> kbuf.buf_min = kernel_segment->mem + kernel_segment->memsz;
> kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
[Severity: High]
Does freeing the CMA segment here create an infinite loop?
The loop updates kbuf.buf_min to search past the current kernel segment
expecting the next kexec_add_buffer() call to allocate from a new hole.
However, kexec_alloc_contig() allocates via CMA:
kernel/kexec_file.c:kexec_alloc_contig() {
...
p = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, nr_pages,
get_order(kbuf->buf_align), true);
...
}
The underlying CMA allocator completely ignores kbuf->buf_min and
kbuf->buf_max. Since the CMA block was just freed, the allocator will
repeatedly return the exact same physically contiguous block.
If load_other_segments() fails due to layout constraints (like dtb or
initrd placement), it will run again with the identical memory layout, fail
for the exact same reason, and loop infinitely causing a system hang.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921090450.807575-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 9:04 [PATCH v6 00/14] crash: Fix several bugs Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] kexec: Fix CMA segment address translation with non-zero text_offset Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] kexec: Record allocated CMA pages to fix release size mismatch Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] kexec: Extract kexec_free_segment_cma() from kimage_free_cma() Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] arm64: kexec_file: Fix CMA page leaks in segment placement retry loops Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] arm64: kexec_file: Fix elf_headers memory leak in retry loop Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] LoongArch: kexec_file: Fix CMA page leaks in segment placement retry loops Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] LoongArch: kexec_file: Fix elf_headers memory leak in retry loop Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] LoongArch: kexec_file: Fix a modified_cmdline leak Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] x86/crash: Fix massive out-of-bounds write on 32-bit Highmem Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] crash: Extract crash_get_memory_ranges() helper Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] crash: Factor out crash_find_elfcorehdr() helper Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] crash: Normalize the kexec_load elfcorehdr at load time Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] driver core: Add device_hotplug_lock_assert_held() helper Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] crash: Fix TOCTOU race in crash memory range collection Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 9:25 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921091840.C62E51F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=bgwin@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=coxu@redhat.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=eric.devolder@oracle.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guodongtai@kylinos.cn \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jbouron@amazon.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liukexin@kylinos.cn \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maqianga@uniontech.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mclapinski@google.com \
--cc=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=piliu@redhat.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=tangyouling@kylinos.cn \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=zhangtianyang@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®