* [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context
@ 2026-09-18 13:29 Zhan Xusheng
2026-09-18 17:34 ` Hui Su
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zhan Xusheng @ 2026-09-18 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz, mingo
Cc: hannes, surenb, jstultz, connoro, metin.kaya, sh_def, juri.lelli,
vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman,
vschneid, kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel, zhanxusheng
psi_account_irqtime() has two callers which share rq->psi_irq_time, and
they disagree about the context: __schedule() passes the outgoing rq->curr,
sched_tick() passes rq->donor. Under proxy execution the donor is blocked
on a mutex while rq->curr burns the CPU.
The tick charges PSI_IRQ_FULL to the donor's cgroup and advances the
timestamp, so the call from __schedule() then finds delta <= 0 and charges
nothing. The delta is not counted twice, it lands on the wrong cgroup.
Pass rq->curr, which is what the call read before commit af0c8b2bf67b
("sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts") renamed curr to donor
across sched_tick(). Without CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC the two rq members
are a union, so this only changes anything where that option is set, and
it depends on EXPERT.
Fixes: af0c8b2bf67b ("sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts")
Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
---
Built and booted on x86_64 with CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC=y, PSI and
IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING enabled, under x86_debug.config and panic_on_warn.
I did not construct a case where donor and curr differ.
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7885ff76e69f..2b48ae0ab372 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5791,7 +5791,7 @@ void sched_tick(void)
curr = rq->curr;
donor = rq->donor;
- psi_account_irqtime(rq, donor, NULL);
+ psi_account_irqtime(rq, curr, NULL);
update_rq_clock(rq);
hw_pressure = arch_scale_hw_pressure(cpu_of(rq));
base-commit: 5dd1818b15d98d4a20806cd00b1b40320b06004f
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context
2026-09-18 13:29 [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context Zhan Xusheng
@ 2026-09-18 17:34 ` Hui Su
2026-09-22 3:30 ` John Stultz
2026-09-22 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hui Su @ 2026-09-18 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhan Xusheng
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, hannes, surenb, jstultz, connoro,
metin.kaya, sh_def, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid,
kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel, zhanxusheng
> I did not construct a case where donor and curr differ.
I tested two proxy-execution processes in separate cgroup v2 cgroups.
The owner held a CPU0 mutex for 20s; a SCHED_FIFO donor blocked on it.
On x86_64 QEMU (4 vCPUs, 2 GiB), with PSI and IRQ time accounting enabled,
the irq.pressure total deltas (us) were:
unpatched: owner 22,053, donor 401,127
patched: owner 552,740, donor 31,566
Both runs completed successfully, and attribution moved to execution context.
This exercises the donor != curr case missing from the original test.
Tested-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context
2026-09-18 13:29 [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context Zhan Xusheng
2026-09-18 17:34 ` Hui Su
@ 2026-09-22 3:30 ` John Stultz
2026-09-22 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: John Stultz @ 2026-09-22 3:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhan Xusheng
Cc: peterz, mingo, hannes, surenb, connoro, metin.kaya, sh_def,
juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
mgorman, vschneid, kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel, zhanxusheng
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 6:29 AM Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> psi_account_irqtime() has two callers which share rq->psi_irq_time, and
> they disagree about the context: __schedule() passes the outgoing rq->curr,
> sched_tick() passes rq->donor. Under proxy execution the donor is blocked
> on a mutex while rq->curr burns the CPU.
>
> The tick charges PSI_IRQ_FULL to the donor's cgroup and advances the
> timestamp, so the call from __schedule() then finds delta <= 0 and charges
> nothing. The delta is not counted twice, it lands on the wrong cgroup.
>
> Pass rq->curr, which is what the call read before commit af0c8b2bf67b
> ("sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts") renamed curr to donor
> across sched_tick(). Without CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC the two rq members
> are a union, so this only changes anything where that option is set, and
> it depends on EXPERT.
>
> Fixes: af0c8b2bf67b ("sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts")
> Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Thank you for finding this, and thank you to Hui Su for testing it!
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
thanks
-john
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context
2026-09-18 13:29 [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context Zhan Xusheng
2026-09-18 17:34 ` Hui Su
2026-09-22 3:30 ` John Stultz
@ 2026-09-22 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-22 9:15 ` Zhan Xusheng
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2026-09-22 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhan Xusheng
Cc: mingo, hannes, surenb, jstultz, connoro, metin.kaya, sh_def,
juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
mgorman, vschneid, kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel, zhanxusheng
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 09:29:15PM +0800, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
> psi_account_irqtime() has two callers which share rq->psi_irq_time, and
> they disagree about the context: __schedule() passes the outgoing rq->curr,
> sched_tick() passes rq->donor. Under proxy execution the donor is blocked
> on a mutex while rq->curr burns the CPU.
>
> The tick charges PSI_IRQ_FULL to the donor's cgroup and advances the
> timestamp, so the call from __schedule() then finds delta <= 0 and charges
> nothing. The delta is not counted twice, it lands on the wrong cgroup.
>
> Pass rq->curr, which is what the call read before commit af0c8b2bf67b
> ("sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts") renamed curr to donor
> across sched_tick(). Without CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC the two rq members
> are a union, so this only changes anything where that option is set, and
> it depends on EXPERT.
>
> Fixes: af0c8b2bf67b ("sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts")
> Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> Built and booted on x86_64 with CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC=y, PSI and
> IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING enabled, under x86_debug.config and panic_on_warn.
> I did not construct a case where donor and curr differ.
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7885ff76e69f..2b48ae0ab372 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5791,7 +5791,7 @@ void sched_tick(void)
> curr = rq->curr;
> donor = rq->donor;
>
> - psi_account_irqtime(rq, donor, NULL);
> + psi_account_irqtime(rq, curr, NULL);
>
> update_rq_clock(rq);
> hw_pressure = arch_scale_hw_pressure(cpu_of(rq));
Does not in fact apply. There is no curr in sched_tick anymore.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context
2026-09-22 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2026-09-22 9:15 ` Zhan Xusheng
2026-09-22 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zhan Xusheng @ 2026-09-22 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Zhan Xusheng, mingo, hannes, surenb, jstultz, connoro,
metin.kaya, sh_def, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid,
kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 10:17:06AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Does not in fact apply. There is no curr in sched_tick anymore.
It needs commit f5741d2b3451 ("sched/core: Call wq_worker_tick() for the
execution context"), which added that local. That is in sched/urgent and
master, not in sched/core, and the patch applies cleanly to the first two.
If you want it on sched/core instead, I will resend using rq->curr at the
call site.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context
2026-09-22 9:15 ` Zhan Xusheng
@ 2026-09-22 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-22 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2026-09-22 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhan Xusheng
Cc: Zhan Xusheng, mingo, hannes, surenb, jstultz, connoro,
metin.kaya, sh_def, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid,
kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 05:15:31PM +0800, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 10:17:06AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Does not in fact apply. There is no curr in sched_tick anymore.
>
> It needs commit f5741d2b3451 ("sched/core: Call wq_worker_tick() for the
> execution context"), which added that local. That is in sched/urgent and
> master, not in sched/core, and the patch applies cleanly to the first two.
>
> If you want it on sched/core instead, I will resend using rq->curr at the
> call site.
Hmm, I thought I was on tip/master which should have /urgent on, but let
me try again. Perhaps I fat-fingered something.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context
2026-09-22 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2026-09-22 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2026-09-22 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhan Xusheng
Cc: Zhan Xusheng, mingo, hannes, surenb, jstultz, connoro,
metin.kaya, sh_def, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid,
kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 11:49:44AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 05:15:31PM +0800, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 10:17:06AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Does not in fact apply. There is no curr in sched_tick anymore.
> >
> > It needs commit f5741d2b3451 ("sched/core: Call wq_worker_tick() for the
> > execution context"), which added that local. That is in sched/urgent and
> > master, not in sched/core, and the patch applies cleanly to the first two.
> >
> > If you want it on sched/core instead, I will resend using rq->curr at the
> > call site.
>
> Hmm, I thought I was on tip/master which should have /urgent on, but let
> me try again. Perhaps I fat-fingered something.
And indeed. I must've done something weird this morning. In it goes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-22 9:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-18 13:29 [PATCH] sched/core: Account PSI IRQ time to the execution context Zhan Xusheng
2026-09-18 17:34 ` Hui Su
2026-09-22 3:30 ` John Stultz
2026-09-22 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-22 9:15 ` Zhan Xusheng
2026-09-22 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-22 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®