From: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] KVM: arm64: vgic: Drop last_lr_irq and serialize overflow EOI replay
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 18:16:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922101623.39468-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bj9r4h9z.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Hi Marc,
Thank you for the candid feedback and for cutting right to the heart of
the problem with the 3-patch series on your branch.
Your series is vastly simpler and elegant:
1. Only caching last_lr_irq when LRs are genuinely full eliminates the
overhead for non-overflow exits.
2. Holding a proper reference on last_lr_irq and releasing it under
ap_list_lock in vgic_prune_ap_list() cleanly addresses the lifetime
hazard without introducing lock-order inversions during folding.
3. Halting the VM (kvm_arm_halt_guest) on remote GICR_CTLR.EnableLPIs=0
completely avoids cross-vCPU concurrency for an event that almost
never happens in practice.
As requested, I wrote a KVM arm64 selftest for this scenario:
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vgic_lpi_disable.c
The test:
- Configures an ITS with multiple LPIs targeting vCPU 0.
- Keeps vCPU 0 in guest mode with EOImode=0 while injecting bursts of
MSIs to force its List Registers to overflow into the ap_list.
- Concurrently, vCPU 1 repeatedly toggles GICR_CTLR.EnableLPIs on
vCPU 0's redistributor.
Regarding testing: I currently no longer have access to KVM-capable
hardware (my test setup is no longer available), so I cannot provide
a Tested-by for your series. The race itself was originally identified
through code inspection rather than a standalone reproducer, which is
why I turned the theoretical scenario directly into this selftest.
The selftest builds cleanly as part of the full arm64 kvm selftest
suite, and its framework plumbing was smoke-tested under QEMU TCG,
which by construction cannot exercise the race itself. I'd be grateful
if you could give it a spin on your setup.
The selftest patch is based on top of your kvm-arm64/vgic-last_lr_irq-fixes
branch and has been sent in reply to this thread.
Thanks,
Yuchao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 4:02 [PATCH v2 0/1] KVM: arm64: vgic: fix UAF/crash on remote LPI disable zjamg
2026-09-18 4:02 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: vgic: Do not remove in-flight LPIs from AP list on disable zjamg
2026-09-18 7:22 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-18 11:50 ` Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-18 11:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-18 19:15 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-20 23:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-20 1:49 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] KVM: arm64: vgic: Drop last_lr_irq and serialize overflow EOI replay Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-20 1:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-20 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " Marc Zyngier
2026-09-22 10:16 ` Yuchao Zhang [this message]
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH] KVM: selftests: arm64: Add test for cross-vCPU LPI disable race Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-22 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] KVM: arm64: vgic: Drop last_lr_irq and serialize overflow EOI replay Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922101623.39468-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--to=ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®