mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: MingTao Huang <1037827920@qq.com>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	MingTao Huang <mintaohuang@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix skipped flushing items not counted in xfsaild_push()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:02:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922150240.GQ2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_F801A9436DFB447AAFEC63D3E615B8052405@qq.com>

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 04:14:29PM +0800, MingTao Huang wrote:
> From: MingTao Huang <mintaohuang@tencent.com>
> 
> Commit f3f7ae68a4ea ("xfs: skip flushing log items during push")
> introduced a fast path in xfsaild_push() that uses
> test_bit(XFS_LI_FLUSHING) to skip log items already being
> flushed.  However, the fast path jumps directly to the
> next_item label, bypassing flushing++, count++, and the
> ail_last_pushed_lsn update.  This causes three problems:
> 
> 1. The loop exit condition "count > 1000" becomes much harder to
>    trigger.  count was meant to track every item visited, but now it
>    only increments for non-flushing items that enter
>    xfsaild_push_item().  Each such item typically triggers an inode
>    cluster flush that marks dozens of neighbouring inodes as flushing,
>    so count effectively counts cluster flushes rather than individual
>    items.  The threshold shifts from 1000 items to ~1000 clusters,
>    letting the loop scan an order of magnitude more items per round.
>    Each cluster flush adds a buffer to ail_buf_list, and the resulting
>    oversized list causes xfs_buf_delwri_submit_nowait() -- which runs
>    list_sort() plus per-buffer trylock and IO submission -- to take so
>    long that the watchdog fires.
> 
> 2. The timeout decision "(stuck + flushing) * 100 / count > 90" is
>    computed without the fast-path flushing items, so the flushing ratio
>    is severely under-reported.  When most of the AIL is flushing, the
>    ratio appears near 0%.  xfsaild therefore selects
>    "tout = 0" when it should select "tout = 20" (20 ms
>    back-off to let IO complete).  The zero-backoff tight loop compounds
>    the ail_buf_list accumulation across rounds.
> 
> 3. ail_last_pushed_lsn is not advanced past flushing items, so the
>    next push round restarts scanning from the same position, repeatedly
>    traversing items that are still in-flight.
> 
> We hit this as a soft lockup during stress testing on an internal
> kernel that includes commit f3f7ae68a4ea ("xfs: skip flushing log
> items during push").  The xfsaild kthread was stuck for
> 22 seconds inside xfs_buf_delwri_submit_nowait(), called from
> xfsaild_push(), processing an excessively large ail_buf_list:
> 
>   watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#48 stuck for 22s! [xfsaild/dm-1:4931]
>   RIP: 0010:xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers+0xf2/0x250 [xfs]
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    xfsaild_push+0x19b/0x7d0 [xfs]
>    xfsaild+0xb8/0x1a0 [xfs]
>    kthread+0xcc/0x100
>    ret_from_fork+0x5f/0xa0
>    ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
>    </TASK>
>   Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
> 
> Fix this by accounting for flushing items in the fast path -- increment
> flushing and count, and update ail_last_pushed_lsn -- to match what the
> XFS_ITEM_FLUSHING case in xfsaild_push_item() already does.  This

Am I missing something?  xfsaild_push_item in 7.3-rc4 doesn't seem to
handle flushing.  Maybe you meant xfsaild_process_logitem?  In which
case bumping flushing/counted makes sense.  I /think/ bumping
ail_last_pushed_lsn makes sense too, but I want to think about that
more.

<confused>

--D

> ensures the loop exit condition, the timeout ratio, and the resume
> position all reflect the true state of the AIL.
> 
> Fixes: f3f7ae68a4ea ("xfs: skip flushing log items during push")
> Signed-off-by: MingTao Huang <mintaohuang@tencent.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> index 99a9bf3762b7..0f72cd4e6983 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> @@ -580,8 +580,12 @@ xfsaild_push(
>  	lsn = lip->li_lsn;
>  	while ((XFS_LSN_CMP(lip->li_lsn, ailp->ail_target) <= 0)) {
>  
> -		if (test_bit(XFS_LI_FLUSHING, &lip->li_flags))
> +		if (test_bit(XFS_LI_FLUSHING, &lip->li_flags)) {
> +			flushing++;
> +			count++;
> +			ailp->ail_last_pushed_lsn = lsn;
>  			goto next_item;
> +		}
>  
>  		xfsaild_process_logitem(ailp, lip, &stuck, &flushing);
>  		count++;
> -- 
> 2.43.7
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-22  8:14 MingTao Huang
2026-09-22 15:02 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-09-22 22:12 ` Dave Chinner
2026-09-23 13:44   ` Brian Foster
2026-09-24  0:34     ` Dave Chinner
2026-09-24  2:11   ` MingTao Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260922150240.GQ2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=1037827920@qq.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mintaohuang@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®