* [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction
@ 2026-09-22 19:14 Siddharth Karanam
2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Siddharth Karanam
2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through pm_runtime Siddharth Karanam
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Siddharth Karanam @ 2026-09-22 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andersson, mathieu.poirier
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc, Siddharth Karanam
Instead of invoking ti_sci_handle's ti_sci_dev_ops member directly
in the driver code, this abstracts the property read of
"ti,sci-dev-id" and the function pointers supported by
ti_sci_dev_ops such as is_on, get_device and put_device.
The goal of the patch is to maintain a single source
of origin for all ti_sci_dev_ops call sites. Any stray calls
to any dev_ops function pointer members in driver code should
eventually be abstracted through this header.
The second patch abstracts certain device ops' firmware logic
even further (such as get_device/put_device) via pm_runtime.
Siddharth Karanam (2):
remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction
remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through
pm_runtime
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c | 16 ++--
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h | 4 +-
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 14 ++--
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 13 ++--
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 40 ++++------
drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction
2026-09-22 19:14 [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Siddharth Karanam
@ 2026-09-22 19:14 ` Siddharth Karanam
2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through pm_runtime Siddharth Karanam
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Siddharth Karanam @ 2026-09-22 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andersson, mathieu.poirier
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc, Siddharth Karanam
Instead of invoking ti_sci_handle's ti_sci_dev_ops member directly
in the driver code, this abstracts the property read of
"ti,sci-dev-id" and the function pointers supported by
ti_sci_dev_ops such as is_on, get_device and put_device.
The goal of the patch is to maintain a single source
of origin for all ti_sci_dev_ops call sites. Any stray calls
to any dev_ops function pointer members in driver code should
eventually be abstracted through this header.
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Karanam <sid9.karanam@gmail.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c | 16 ++---
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h | 4 +-
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 14 ++--
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 13 ++--
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 40 +++++------
drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
index 3cb8ae5d72f6..befa9a9bea3a 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include "omap_remoteproc.h"
#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
+#include "ti_sci_dev.h"
#include "ti_sci_proc.h"
#include "ti_k3_common.h"
@@ -120,8 +121,7 @@ int k3_rproc_reset(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
if (ret)
dev_err(dev, "local-reset assert failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
} else {
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd);
if (ret)
dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
}
@@ -140,13 +140,11 @@ int k3_rproc_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
- if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id))
+ if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd))
dev_warn(dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n");
}
} else {
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd);
if (ret)
dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
}
@@ -223,8 +221,7 @@ int k3_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
}
}
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "could not deassert module-reset for internal RAM loading\n");
return ret;
@@ -253,8 +250,7 @@ int k3_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED)
return 0;
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed\n");
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h
index aee3c28dbe51..7ba0903ebe0a 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ struct k3_rproc_dev_data {
* @reset: reset control handle
* @data: pointer to DSP-specific device data
* @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle
+ * @tsd: TI-SCI device control handle
* @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle
- * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
* @mbox: mailbox channel handle
* @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel
* @priv: void pointer to carry any private data
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ struct k3_rproc {
struct reset_control *reset;
const struct k3_rproc_dev_data *data;
struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
+ struct ti_sci_dev *tsd;
const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
- u32 ti_sci_id;
struct mbox_chan *mbox;
struct mbox_client client;
void *priv;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
index d6ceea6dc920..b6042fe7bae7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include "omap_remoteproc.h"
#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
+#include "ti_sci_dev.h"
#include "ti_sci_proc.h"
#include "ti_k3_common.h"
@@ -69,7 +70,6 @@ static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = {
static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
- struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
const struct k3_rproc_dev_data *data;
struct k3_rproc *kproc;
struct rproc *rproc;
@@ -110,10 +110,6 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci),
"failed to get ti-sci handle\n");
- ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id);
- if (ret)
- return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n");
-
kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset),
@@ -124,6 +120,11 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp),
"failed to construct ti-sci proc control\n");
+ kproc->tsd = ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(dev, kproc->ti_sci);
+ if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsd))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsd),
+ "failed to construct ti-sci dev control\n");
+
ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "ti_sci_proc_request failed\n");
@@ -141,8 +142,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "reserved memory init failed\n");
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id,
- NULL, &p_state);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_is_on(kproc->tsd, NULL, &p_state);
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined\n");
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
index 3a11fd24eb52..ddf8cb9974ca 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include "omap_remoteproc.h"
#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
+#include "ti_sci_dev.h"
#include "ti_sci_proc.h"
#include "ti_k3_common.h"
@@ -70,10 +71,6 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci),
"failed to get ti-sci handle\n");
- ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id);
- if (ret)
- return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n");
-
kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset), "failed to get reset\n");
@@ -83,6 +80,11 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp),
"failed to construct ti-sci proc control\n");
+ kproc->tsd = ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(dev, kproc->ti_sci);
+ if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsd))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsd),
+ "failed to construct ti-sci dev control\n");
+
ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp);
if (ret < 0)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "ti_sci_proc_request failed\n");
@@ -98,8 +100,7 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "reserved memory init failed\n");
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id,
- &r_state, &p_state);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_is_on(kproc->tsd, &r_state, &p_state);
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
"failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined\n");
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
index b1d04d082e44..a387848ac400 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include "omap_remoteproc.h"
#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
+#include "ti_sci_dev.h"
#include "ti_sci_proc.h"
#include "ti_k3_common.h"
@@ -140,8 +141,7 @@ static int k3_r5_split_reset(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
return ret;
}
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd);
if (ret) {
dev_err(kproc->dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n",
ret);
@@ -156,8 +156,7 @@ static int k3_r5_split_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
{
int ret;
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd);
if (ret) {
dev_err(kproc->dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n",
ret);
@@ -168,8 +167,7 @@ static int k3_r5_split_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
if (ret) {
dev_err(kproc->dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n",
ret);
- if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id))
+ if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd))
dev_warn(kproc->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n");
}
@@ -196,8 +194,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_reset(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster)
/* disable PSC modules on all applicable cores */
list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) {
kproc = core->kproc;
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd);
if (ret) {
dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n",
ret);
@@ -210,8 +207,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_reset(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster)
unroll_module_reset:
list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) {
kproc = core->kproc;
- if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id))
+ if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd))
dev_warn(core->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n");
}
core = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem);
@@ -233,8 +229,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_release(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster)
/* enable PSC modules on all applicable cores */
list_for_each_entry_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) {
kproc = core->kproc;
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd);
if (ret) {
dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n",
ret);
@@ -264,8 +259,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_release(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster)
unroll_module_reset:
list_for_each_entry_from(core, &cluster->cores, elem) {
kproc = core->kproc;
- if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
- kproc->ti_sci_id))
+ if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd))
dev_warn(core->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n");
}
@@ -827,8 +821,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem);
- ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id,
- &r_state, &c_state);
+ ret = ti_sci_dev_is_on(kproc->tsd, &r_state, &c_state);
if (ret) {
dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined, ret = %d\n",
ret);
@@ -1023,7 +1016,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct k3_rproc *kproc;
struct k3_r5_core *core, *core1;
- struct device_node *np;
struct device *cdev;
const char *fw_name;
struct rproc *rproc;
@@ -1032,7 +1024,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
core1 = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem);
list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) {
cdev = core->dev;
- np = dev_of_node(cdev);
ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(cdev, 0, &fw_name);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to parse firmware-name property, ret = %d\n",
@@ -1067,12 +1058,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto out;
}
- ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(cdev, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n");
- goto out;
- }
-
kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(cdev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) {
ret = dev_err_probe(cdev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset),
@@ -1087,6 +1072,13 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto out;
}
+ kproc->tsd = ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(cdev, kproc->ti_sci);
+ if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsd)) {
+ ret = dev_err_probe(cdev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsd),
+ "failed to construct ti-sci dev control\n");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
ret = k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(to_platform_device(cdev), kproc);
if (ret) {
dev_err(cdev, "failed to get internal memories, ret = %d\n",
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..897998a97d7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Texas Instruments TI-SCI Device Controller Helper Functions
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2026 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/
+ */
+
+#ifndef REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_DEV_H
+#define REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_DEV_H
+
+#include <linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+
+/**
+ * struct ti_sci_dev - structure representing a device control client
+ * @sci: cached TI-SCI protocol handle
+ * @ops: cached TI-SCI device ops
+ * @dev: cached client device pointer
+ * @dev_id: TI-SCI device id for the consumer remoteproc device
+ */
+struct ti_sci_dev {
+ const struct ti_sci_handle *sci;
+ const struct ti_sci_dev_ops *ops;
+ struct device *dev;
+ u32 dev_id;
+};
+
+static inline
+struct ti_sci_dev *ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(struct device *dev,
+ const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
+{
+ struct ti_sci_dev *tsd;
+ int ret;
+
+ tsd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tsd), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tsd)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_of_node(dev), "ti,sci-dev-id",
+ &tsd->dev_id);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
+ tsd->dev = dev;
+ tsd->sci = sci;
+ tsd->ops = &sci->ops.dev_ops;
+
+ return tsd;
+}
+
+static inline int ti_sci_dev_is_on(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd, bool *r_state,
+ bool *c_state)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = tsd->ops->is_on(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id, r_state, c_state);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device is_on failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline int ti_sci_dev_get_device(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = tsd->ops->get_device(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device get failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline int ti_sci_dev_put_device(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = tsd->ops->put_device(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device put failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+#endif /* REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_DEV_H */
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through pm_runtime
2026-09-22 19:14 [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Siddharth Karanam
2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Siddharth Karanam
@ 2026-09-22 19:14 ` Siddharth Karanam
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Siddharth Karanam @ 2026-09-22 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andersson, mathieu.poirier
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc, Siddharth Karanam
Instead of directly invoking ti_sci_handle->dev_ops.get_device /
put_device (that is direct firmware logic), it is better to abstract it
through linux/pm_runtime.h's pm_runtime_put/get_sync which will call
the vendor's specific firmware logic automatically. The rationale here
being better code quality and reduced scope for refactoring in case of
any changes to the ti_sci protocol.
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Karanam <sid9.karanam@gmail.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h
index 897998a97d7f..ec17af3ebf5e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h
@@ -59,23 +59,30 @@ static inline int ti_sci_dev_is_on(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd, bool *r_state,
return ret;
}
+/* Request power on to rproc through the TI-SCI PM domain */
static inline int ti_sci_dev_get_device(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(tsd->dev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(tsd->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(tsd->dev);
+ }
- ret = tsd->ops->get_device(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id);
- if (ret)
- dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device get failed: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
+/* Request power off to a rproc through the TI-SCI PM domain */
static inline int ti_sci_dev_put_device(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = pm_runtime_put_sync(tsd->dev);
+
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(tsd->dev, "pm_runtime_put_sync failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
- ret = tsd->ops->put_device(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id);
- if (ret)
- dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device put failed: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-22 19:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-22 19:14 [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Siddharth Karanam
2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Siddharth Karanam
2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through pm_runtime Siddharth Karanam
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®