mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* perf stat: worth documenting task-clock/cpu-clock in perf-stat.txt?
@ 2026-09-22 21:55 Christian Melendez
  2026-09-23  7:41 ` Ian Rogers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christian Melendez @ 2026-09-22 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  Cc: Namhyung Kim, Jiri Olsa, Peter Zijlstra, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel

Hello Arnaldo,

I'm learning performance engineering and ran into this while playing
around with perf stat. perf-stat.txt's TIMINGS section explains "time
elapsed" and "user"/"sys", but I couldn't find task-clock itself
documented anywhere, even though it appears in the first command
example, as the very first metric shown.

This apparently came up unanswered on this list before, in 2013 and
2015 (2015: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-perf-users/msg02405.html),
where users asked about cpu-clock too, without anything ever being
added to the docs. Would it be worth documenting task-clock/cpu-clock
there? Happy to send a patch if so.

Best regards,
Christian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-23 15:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-22 21:55 perf stat: worth documenting task-clock/cpu-clock in perf-stat.txt? Christian Melendez
2026-09-23  7:41 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-23 13:51   ` [PATCH] perf stat: document task-clock/cpu-clock in TIMINGS Christian Melendez
2026-09-23 15:14     ` Ian Rogers

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®