mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Bence Csokas <bence.csokas@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] cache: Make cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() error out if there are no handlers
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 02:48:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923024832.53b104c7@jic23-hlaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922-cci_enxio-v1-1-00bade212729@arm.com>

On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 09:29:31 +0200
Bence Csokas <bence.csokas@arm.com> wrote:

> Currently, if there are no registered handlers,
> cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() returns 0. Callers are expected to check
> cpu_cache_has_invalidate_memregion() and return -ENXIO themselves, instead
> of calling this function. If a caller forgets to do this, they may
> erroneously think the operation succeeded. This is in contrast to x86,
> where cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() itself checks if the operation is
> supported, and returns -ENXIO if it is not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bence Csokas <bence.csokas@arm.com>

As you noted short of a race we should never hit this in practice as
all callers must check for support first. Still good to close
that race.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>

Jonathan

> ---
>  lib/cache_maint.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/cache_maint.c b/lib/cache_maint.c
> index 9256a9ffc34c..132d2816d6b1 100644
> --- a/lib/cache_maint.c
> +++ b/lib/cache_maint.c
> @@ -59,12 +59,12 @@ static int cache_inval_done_one(struct cache_coherency_ops_inst *cci)
>  
>  static int cache_invalidate_memregion(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size)
>  {
> -	int ret;
>  	struct cache_coherency_ops_inst *cci;
>  	struct cc_inval_params params = {
>  		.addr = addr,
>  		.size = size,
>  	};
> +	int ret = -ENXIO;
>  
>  	guard(rwsem_read)(&cache_ops_instance_list_lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry(cci, &cache_ops_instance_list, node) {
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int cache_invalidate_memregion(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  struct cache_coherency_ops_inst *
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-22  7:29 [PATCH RFC] Why does cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() return 0 if there are no handlers? Bence Csokas
2026-09-22  7:29 ` [PATCH RFC] cache: Make cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() error out if there are no handlers Bence Csokas
2026-09-23  1:48   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-09-23  2:18   ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-23  8:21     ` Bence Csókás
2026-09-23 17:31       ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260923024832.53b104c7@jic23-hlaptop \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bence.csokas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®