From: "Bence Csókás" <bence.csokas@arm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] cache: Make cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() error out if there are no handlers
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:21:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5456d59-aad5-40cc-ac89-5c0c113b560a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922191808.b82fa138c8bc80a1285e8ba4@linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
On 2026. 09. 23. 4:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 09:29:31 +0200 Bence Csokas <bence.csokas@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently, if there are no registered handlers,
>> cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() returns 0. Callers are expected to check
>> cpu_cache_has_invalidate_memregion() and return -ENXIO themselves, instead
>> of calling this function. If a caller forgets to do this, they may
>> erroneously think the operation succeeded. This is in contrast to x86,
>> where cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() itself checks if the operation is
>> supported, and returns -ENXIO if it is not.
>
> Do you expect any callers to be altered as a result of this change?
>
> If so, full details would be helpful.
Current callers, not necessarily. Future callers, maybe.
Presently, as far as I see, there are 2 consumers: CXL and NVDIMM, with
3 call sites in total.
2 of these call sites [1] [2] are in the form of:
if (!has_invalidate()) {
if (TEST)
return 0;
return -ENXIO;
}
invalidate();
These types of call sites can stay as-is.
The remaining one [3] is in a void function, and in the form:
if (has_invalidate())
invalidate();
Lastly, while not a consumer, here's what x86 [4] does. It's possible a
future caller will want to replicate this:
if (!has_invalidate())
return -ENXIO;
invalidate();
These types of call sites can do away with calling has_invalidate()
going forward.
[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/drivers/cxl/core/region.c#L242
[2]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c#L93
[3]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/drivers/nvdimm/region.c#L113
[4]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c#L372
Bence
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 7:29 [PATCH RFC] Why does cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() return 0 if there are no handlers? Bence Csokas
2026-09-22 7:29 ` [PATCH RFC] cache: Make cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() error out if there are no handlers Bence Csokas
2026-09-23 1:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-23 2:18 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-23 8:21 ` Bence Csókás [this message]
2026-09-23 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5456d59-aad5-40cc-ac89-5c0c113b560a@arm.com \
--to=bence.csokas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®