mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bence Csókás" <bence.csokas@arm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] cache: Make cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() error out if there are no handlers
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:21:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5456d59-aad5-40cc-ac89-5c0c113b560a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922191808.b82fa138c8bc80a1285e8ba4@linux-foundation.org>

Hi,

On 2026. 09. 23. 4:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 09:29:31 +0200 Bence Csokas <bence.csokas@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Currently, if there are no registered handlers,
>> cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() returns 0. Callers are expected to check
>> cpu_cache_has_invalidate_memregion() and return -ENXIO themselves, instead
>> of calling this function. If a caller forgets to do this, they may
>> erroneously think the operation succeeded. This is in contrast to x86,
>> where cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() itself checks if the operation is
>> supported, and returns -ENXIO if it is not.
> 
> Do you expect any callers to be altered as a result of this change?
> 
> If so, full details would be helpful.

Current callers, not necessarily. Future callers, maybe.

Presently, as far as I see, there are 2 consumers: CXL and NVDIMM, with 
3 call sites in total.

2 of these call sites [1] [2] are in the form of:

	if (!has_invalidate()) {
		if (TEST)
			return 0;
		return -ENXIO;
	}
	invalidate();

These types of call sites can stay as-is.

The remaining one [3] is in a void function, and in the form:

	if (has_invalidate())
		invalidate();

Lastly, while not a consumer, here's what x86 [4] does. It's possible a 
future caller will want to replicate this:

	if (!has_invalidate())
		return -ENXIO;
	invalidate();

These types of call sites can do away with calling has_invalidate() 
going forward.

[1] 
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/drivers/cxl/core/region.c#L242
[2] 
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c#L93
[3] 
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/drivers/nvdimm/region.c#L113
[4] 
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c#L372

Bence

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-22  7:29 [PATCH RFC] Why does cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() return 0 if there are no handlers? Bence Csokas
2026-09-22  7:29 ` [PATCH RFC] cache: Make cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() error out if there are no handlers Bence Csokas
2026-09-23  1:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-23  2:18   ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-23  8:21     ` Bence Csókás [this message]
2026-09-23 17:31       ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a5456d59-aad5-40cc-ac89-5c0c113b560a@arm.com \
    --to=bence.csokas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®