Re: misc: fastrpc: is a ctx_idr IDR -> XArray conversion wanted?

[Murali Krishna <muralikrishna2444b@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 11:28:52AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> I doubt it's really needed unless you can prove some sort of advantage
> for the change?  Is it faster on a measurable path, or less memory or
> something else that would justify the churn?
>
> idr is still a fine structure/api for many things, they don't all have
> to go away, otherwise we would have done so long ago.

Understood, and I cannot show such an advantage. struct idr is already
built on the same underlying tree as the xarray, so there is nothing
measurable to gain here in speed or memory -- it would be churn for its
own sake. I will drop the conversion.

Thank you for answering so quickly, and for explaining the reasoning
rather than just saying no. That was useful to me.

If there is something in fastrpc, or elsewhere in drivers/misc, that you
would actually like to see worked on, I would be glad to take on
something small and learn from the review.

Thanks,
Murali Krishna