mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy
@ 2026-09-23 20:37 Aldo Ariel Panzardo
  2026-09-23 21:00 ` Andrew Lunn
  2026-09-24  2:15 ` Wei Fang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Aldo Ariel Panzardo @ 2026-09-23 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wei.fang
  Cc: andrew, frank.li, shenwei.wang, imx, netdev, linux-kernel,
	stable, Aldo Ariel Panzardo, Sashiko

fec_enet_txq_submit_frag_skb() and fec_enet_txq_submit_skb() copy
transmit data into a per-ring bounce buffer when the source address is
misaligned or the FEC_QUIRK_SWAP_FRAME quirk is active. The bounce
buffers are allocated as kmalloc(FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE) where
FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE is 2048 bytes.

However, skb_frag_size() can return up to PAGE_SIZE (4096 on most
architectures) for scatter-gather fragments, and skb_headlen() can
exceed 2048 for certain GSO packets. When this happens the memcpy
overflows the bounce buffer by up to 2048 bytes, corrupting adjacent
heap objects.

Add a length check before each bounce-buffer copy. If the data exceeds
the bounce buffer capacity, fall through to the error path rather than
performing the out-of-bounds write.

Fixes: 6605b730c061 ("FEC: Add alignment handling for FEC driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Aldo Ariel Panzardo <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
index 794ec42..8614984 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
@@ -558,6 +558,8 @@ fec_enet_txq_submit_frag_skb(struct fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq,
 		index = fec_enet_get_bd_index(bdp, &txq->bd);
 		if (((unsigned long) bufaddr) & fep->tx_align ||
 			fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_SWAP_FRAME) {
+			if (frag_len > FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE)
+				goto dma_mapping_error;
 			memcpy(txq->tx_bounce[index], bufaddr, frag_len);
 			bufaddr = txq->tx_bounce[index];
 
@@ -634,6 +636,8 @@ static int fec_enet_txq_submit_skb(struct fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq,
 	index = fec_enet_get_bd_index(bdp, &txq->bd);
 	if (((unsigned long) bufaddr) & fep->tx_align ||
 		fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_SWAP_FRAME) {
+		if (buflen > FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE)
+			goto release;
 		memcpy(txq->tx_bounce[index], skb->data, buflen);
 		bufaddr = txq->tx_bounce[index];
 
-- 
2.43.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy
  2026-09-23 20:37 [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy Aldo Ariel Panzardo
@ 2026-09-23 21:00 ` Andrew Lunn
       [not found]   ` <CAP48Hfto4qc285B3Jw7ZRuC-wGf57JOBPZOdrrAt-aDfGcas8Q@mail.gmail.com>
  2026-09-24  2:15 ` Wei Fang
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2026-09-23 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aldo Ariel Panzardo
  Cc: wei.fang, frank.li, shenwei.wang, imx, netdev, linux-kernel,
	stable, Sashiko

On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 05:37:38PM -0300, Aldo Ariel Panzardo wrote:
> fec_enet_txq_submit_frag_skb() and fec_enet_txq_submit_skb() copy
> transmit data into a per-ring bounce buffer when the source address is
> misaligned or the FEC_QUIRK_SWAP_FRAME quirk is active.

ndev->max_mtu = fep->max_buf_size - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN;

What value is this? Is it greater than, or smaller than FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE?

	Andrew

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy
  2026-09-23 20:37 [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy Aldo Ariel Panzardo
  2026-09-23 21:00 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2026-09-24  2:15 ` Wei Fang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2026-09-24  2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aldo Ariel Panzardo
  Cc: andrew, Frank Li, Shenwei Wang, imx, netdev, linux-kernel,
	stable, Sashiko

> fec_enet_txq_submit_frag_skb() and fec_enet_txq_submit_skb() copy
> transmit data into a per-ring bounce buffer when the source address is
> misaligned or the FEC_QUIRK_SWAP_FRAME quirk is active. The bounce
> buffers are allocated as kmalloc(FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE) where
> FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE is 2048 bytes.
> 
> However, skb_frag_size() can return up to PAGE_SIZE (4096 on most
> architectures) for scatter-gather fragments, and skb_headlen() can
> exceed 2048 for certain GSO packets. When this happens the memcpy
> overflows the bounce buffer by up to 2048 bytes, corrupting adjacent
> heap objects.
> 
> Add a length check before each bounce-buffer copy. If the data exceeds
> the bounce buffer capacity, fall through to the error path rather than
> performing the out-of-bounds write.
> 
> Fixes: 6605b730c061 ("FEC: Add alignment handling for FEC driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Aldo Ariel Panzardo <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> index 794ec42..8614984 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> @@ -558,6 +558,8 @@ fec_enet_txq_submit_frag_skb(struct
> fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq,
>  		index = fec_enet_get_bd_index(bdp, &txq->bd);
>  		if (((unsigned long) bufaddr) & fep->tx_align ||
>  			fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_SWAP_FRAME) {
> +			if (frag_len > FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE)
> +				goto dma_mapping_error;
>  			memcpy(txq->tx_bounce[index], bufaddr, frag_len);
>  			bufaddr = txq->tx_bounce[index];
> 
> @@ -634,6 +636,8 @@ static int fec_enet_txq_submit_skb(struct
> fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq,
>  	index = fec_enet_get_bd_index(bdp, &txq->bd);
>  	if (((unsigned long) bufaddr) & fep->tx_align ||
>  		fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_SWAP_FRAME) {
> +		if (buflen > FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE)
> +			goto release;

Where is the 'release' label, I could not find it in latest net tree.

Also, do not repost a new version within 24 hours.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst#L15


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy
       [not found]   ` <CAP48Hfto4qc285B3Jw7ZRuC-wGf57JOBPZOdrrAt-aDfGcas8Q@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2026-09-24 12:40     ` Andrew Lunn
  2026-09-24 15:24       ` Shenwei Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2026-09-24 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aldo Ariel
  Cc: wei.fang, frank.li, shenwei.wang, imx, netdev, linux-kernel,
	stable, Sashiko

On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 06:22:01PM -0300, Aldo Ariel wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> PKT_MAXBUF_SIZE = round_down(2048 - 64, 64) = 1984
> max_mtu (non-jumbo) = 1984 - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN = 1962
> 
> So for standard MTU, max_mtu < FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE and individual
> fragments should not exceed the bounce buffer.
> 
> However, when the device supports jumbo frames,
> max_buf_size = MAX_JUMBO_BUF_SIZE (~16256) and max_mtu reaches ~16234.
> Scatter-gather fragments in that case can exceed FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE
> while still needing the bounce path for alignment or byte-swap.
> 
> Should I respin with a check only for the jumbo path, or is the
> unconditional guard acceptable?

Can bounce buffers and jumbo be used at the same time?

How is the scatter-gather size determined? Maybe the better fix is to
set the fragment size based on the size of the bounce buffer when it
is in use?

	Andrew

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy
  2026-09-24 12:40     ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2026-09-24 15:24       ` Shenwei Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shenwei Wang @ 2026-09-24 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Lunn, Aldo Ariel
  Cc: Wei Fang, Frank Li, imx, netdev, linux-kernel, stable, Sashiko




NXP Confidential
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2026 7:41 AM
> To: Aldo Ariel <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
> Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>; Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; Shenwei Wang
> <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>; imx@lists.linux.dev; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org; Sashiko <sashiko-
> bot@kernel.org>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before
> bounce-buffer memcpy
>
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening
> attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this email'
> button
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 06:22:01PM -0300, Aldo Ariel wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > PKT_MAXBUF_SIZE = round_down(2048 - 64, 64) = 1984 max_mtu (non-jumbo)
> > = 1984 - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN = 1962
> >
> > So for standard MTU, max_mtu < FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE and individual
> > fragments should not exceed the bounce buffer.
> >
> > However, when the device supports jumbo frames, max_buf_size =
> > MAX_JUMBO_BUF_SIZE (~16256) and max_mtu reaches ~16234.
> > Scatter-gather fragments in that case can exceed FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE
> > while still needing the bounce path for alignment or byte-swap.
> >
> > Should I respin with a check only for the jumbo path, or is the
> > unconditional guard acceptable?
>
> Can bounce buffers and jumbo be used at the same time?
>

No. Bounce buffer is only available on i.mx28.

Shenwei

> How is the scatter-gather size determined? Maybe the better fix is to set the
> fragment size based on the size of the bounce buffer when it is in use?
>
>         Andrew

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-24 15:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-23 20:37 [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy Aldo Ariel Panzardo
2026-09-23 21:00 ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]   ` <CAP48Hfto4qc285B3Jw7ZRuC-wGf57JOBPZOdrrAt-aDfGcas8Q@mail.gmail.com>
2026-09-24 12:40     ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-24 15:24       ` Shenwei Wang
2026-09-24  2:15 ` Wei Fang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®