mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Danish Khateeb <danishkhateeb03@gmail.com>
To: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>, "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Danish Khateeb <danishkhateeb03@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: fix WIFSIGNALED() for status 0
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 15:56:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923205622.1123270-1-danishkhateeb03@gmail.com> (raw)

nolibc's WIFSIGNALED() is true for status 0, so a child that exits with
0 looks as if it was killed by signal 0. I ran into it in a nolibc init
for a QEMU test, which reported every clean exit of a child that way.

Patch 1 fixes the macro. Patch 2 adds nolibc-test cases for the wait
status macros, which would have caught it.

Tested on top of nolibc/for-next f2212892b6a0:
- x86_64: without patch 1, the new wifsignaled_exit0 test fails, and
  the rest of nolibc-test gives the same results with and without it.
- x86_64, i386, and arm and sparc64 under qemu-user: all new tests pass.
- libc-test against glibc: all new tests pass, so the expected values
  match glibc.

Danish Khateeb (2):
  tools/nolibc: fix WIFSIGNALED() for status 0
  selftests/nolibc: add tests for the wait status macros

 tools/include/nolibc/types.h                 | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


base-commit: f2212892b6a0c2adab438783e9fa8093c90786d7
-- 
2.55.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23 20:56 Danish Khateeb [this message]
2026-09-23 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Danish Khateeb
2026-09-23 20:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/nolibc: add tests for the wait status macros Danish Khateeb
2026-09-24  8:41 ` [PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: fix WIFSIGNALED() for status 0 Thomas Weißschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260923205622.1123270-1-danishkhateeb03@gmail.com \
    --to=danishkhateeb03@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®