From: Danish Khateeb <danishkhateeb03@gmail.com>
To: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>, "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Danish Khateeb <danishkhateeb03@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: fix WIFSIGNALED() for status 0
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 15:56:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923205622.1123270-1-danishkhateeb03@gmail.com> (raw)
nolibc's WIFSIGNALED() is true for status 0, so a child that exits with
0 looks as if it was killed by signal 0. I ran into it in a nolibc init
for a QEMU test, which reported every clean exit of a child that way.
Patch 1 fixes the macro. Patch 2 adds nolibc-test cases for the wait
status macros, which would have caught it.
Tested on top of nolibc/for-next f2212892b6a0:
- x86_64: without patch 1, the new wifsignaled_exit0 test fails, and
the rest of nolibc-test gives the same results with and without it.
- x86_64, i386, and arm and sparc64 under qemu-user: all new tests pass.
- libc-test against glibc: all new tests pass, so the expected values
match glibc.
Danish Khateeb (2):
tools/nolibc: fix WIFSIGNALED() for status 0
selftests/nolibc: add tests for the wait status macros
tools/include/nolibc/types.h | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
base-commit: f2212892b6a0c2adab438783e9fa8093c90786d7
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 20:56 Danish Khateeb [this message]
2026-09-23 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Danish Khateeb
2026-09-23 20:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/nolibc: add tests for the wait status macros Danish Khateeb
2026-09-24 8:41 ` [PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: fix WIFSIGNALED() for status 0 Thomas Weißschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923205622.1123270-1-danishkhateeb03@gmail.com \
--to=danishkhateeb03@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®