mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
To: tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net, heiko@sntech.de, robh@kernel.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
	will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, ulfh@kernel.org,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, ogabbay@kernel.org,
	zhangqing@rock-chips.com
Cc: royalnet026@gmail.com, abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com,
	sebastian.reichel@collabora.com, sidong.yang@furiosa.ai,
	u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com, chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com,
	diederik@cknow-tech.com, alchark@flipper.net,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Subject: [PATCH v14 03/15] accel/rocket: wait for a running IRQ handler before resetting a core
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 22:21:23 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924102135.92217-4-gahing@gahingwoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924102135.92217-1-gahing@gahingwoo.com>

drm_sched_stop() does not wait for a threaded handler that is already
running. Call synchronize_irq() after it, outside job_lock, which the
handler takes.

Before the sync, mask the block's interrupt and clear its raw status, so
that an active core cannot signal a completion after it. Do that under
job_lock, since rocket_job_hw_submit() arms the same mask under that lock,
and only when pm_runtime_get_if_active() returns a positive count: the
reset holds no runtime PM reference, and with the domain down a register
access takes an async SError.

Igor Paunovic's induced-reset runs on RK3588, including a two-task job that
puts hw_submit() on the IRQ thread, found no fault; as he put it, "this
does not show the race is closed".

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260819073530.6087-1-royalnet026@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAEWPSH5mxTbUkNouxm6yecMZYvDowquhvYvhaXQ8HoMtHD5U1g@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260912113717.6819-1-royalnet026@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260916132824.13527-1-royalnet026@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260919103422.148834-1-royalnet026@gmail.com/
Suggested-by: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Tested-by: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com> # RK3588, three cores, induced reset, JOB_TIMEOUT_MS=2
---
 drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
index 575945015..bcafa89ba 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
@@ -377,9 +377,74 @@ rocket_reset(struct rocket_core *core, struct drm_sched_job *bad)
 	drm_sched_stop(&core->sched, bad);
 
 	/*
-	 * Remaining interrupts have been handled, but we might still have
-	 * stuck jobs. Let's make sure the PM counters stay balanced by
-	 * manually calling pm_runtime_put_noidle().
+	 * Mask the block before waiting. hw_submit() arms INTERRUPT_MASK on
+	 * every submit and only the hardirq clears it, so on an ordinary
+	 * timeout it is still live and a completion can arrive after the sync
+	 * returns. The next submit re-arms it, so nothing is lost here.
+	 *
+	 * Only when the device is already awake, though. This function holds no
+	 * runtime PM reference of its own: the only one in the window belongs to
+	 * in_flight_job, and the completion path may have put it and cleared the
+	 * pointer before the timeout worker got here. drm_sched_stop() above can
+	 * block for a long time, and it drops every pending job's credits, so
+	 * rocket_job_is_idle() is true and nothing keeps the core resumed. On
+	 * this hardware a register access with the domain down takes an async
+	 * SError, so a reset must not be the thing that causes one.
+	 *
+	 * Only a positive answer will do. pm_runtime_get_if_active() tests
+	 * power.disable_depth before power.runtime_status, so -EINVAL MASKS a
+	 * suspended device rather than excluding one: pm_runtime_force_suspend(),
+	 * which is this driver's own system suspend callback, disables runtime PM
+	 * first and turns the clocks off second, and rocket_core_fini() suspends
+	 * the core and disables before it cancels the timeout worker. Both leave
+	 * the domain down with -EINVAL on offer.
+	 *
+	 * The cost is the other half of that ambiguity. A core that is still up
+	 * with runtime PM disabled (pm_runtime_force_suspend() before its
+	 * callback has run, or CONFIG_PM=n under COMPILE_TEST) is left unmasked,
+	 * because writing to it would mean writing to the half that is down as
+	 * well.
+	 *
+	 * Clear the raw status along with the mask, the way the completion path
+	 * does. Masking alone leaves the DPU bit latched until
+	 * rocket_core_reset(), and the hardirq decides on raw status alone, so a
+	 * fault from the IOMMU that shares this line would wake the thread again
+	 * and what the comment below asserts would stop being true.
+	 *
+	 * UNDER job_lock, because rocket_job_hw_submit() arms this same
+	 * register and always runs under that lock. reset.pending is set here
+	 * without the lock and read there with it, so a submit that has already
+	 * passed its check can re-arm the mask after this clears it, and then
+	 * the synchronize_irq() below fences a handler that is no longer the
+	 * one that matters: the block is left running a task with its
+	 * interrupt live. rocket_job_handle_irq() avoids the same race on
+	 * OPERATION_ENABLE by making its completion writes under this lock.
+	 *
+	 * pm_runtime_get_if_active() does not invoke a callback -- it only
+	 * takes a reference on an already-active device -- and
+	 * pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() is asynchronous, so neither can re-enter
+	 * this driver's runtime PM callbacks while the lock is held.
+	 */
+	scoped_guard(mutex, &core->job_lock) {
+		if (pm_runtime_get_if_active(core->dev) > 0) {
+			rocket_pc_writel(core, INTERRUPT_MASK, 0x0);
+			rocket_pc_writel(core, INTERRUPT_CLEAR, 0x1ffff);
+			pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(core->dev);
+		}
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * drm_sched_stop() returns without waiting for a threaded handler that
+	 * is already running, so wait for one here. This has to stay outside
+	 * job_lock: the handler takes that lock, so waiting for it while
+	 * holding it would deadlock instead of fencing anything.
+	 */
+	synchronize_irq(core->irq);
+
+	/*
+	 * No handler is running now, but we might still have stuck jobs. Let's
+	 * make sure the PM counters stay balanced by manually calling
+	 * pm_runtime_put_noidle().
 	 */
 	scoped_guard(mutex, &core->job_lock) {
 		if (core->in_flight_job)
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 10:21 [PATCH v14 00/15] accel/rocket: RK3576 NPU (RKNN) enablement Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 01/15] accel/rocket: request the core clocks by name Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 02/15] accel/rocket: take the completion register writes under job_lock Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` Jiaxing Hu [this message]
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 04/15] accel/rocket: let the core suspend after a reset Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 05/15] accel/rocket: factor the completion tail out of the IRQ handler Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 06/15] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3576-rknn-core Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 07/15] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: allow resets in a power domain node Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 08/15] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: describe the RK3576 NPU MMU Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 09/15] pmdomain: rockchip: add optional per-domain power-on settle delay Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 10/15] pmdomain: rockchip: cycle an optional power-domain reset on power-on Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 11/15] accel/rocket: select the per-core clock and reset counts from match data Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 12/15] accel/rocket: add RK3576 NPU (RKNN) support Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 13/15] arm64: dts: rockchip: add NPU core domain clocks and resets to rk3576 Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 14/15] arm64: dts: rockchip: add NPU (RKNN) nodes " Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-24 10:21 ` [PATCH v14 15/15] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable the NPU on rk3576-rock-4d Jiaxing Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924102135.92217-4-gahing@gahingwoo.com \
    --to=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
    --cc=abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=alchark@flipper.net \
    --cc=chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=royalnet026@gmail.com \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=sidong.yang@furiosa.ai \
    --cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
    --cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®