From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: "Srinivas Pandruvada" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
"Hans de Goede" <hansg@kernel.org>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"David E Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 19/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Describe the device creation policy on the function
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:23:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924182342.212709-20-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924182342.212709-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
The comment explaining the error policy of tpmi_create_devices() sits
inside the loop, between the call and the check it describes. Move it
above the function, where it describes the policy as a whole.
Also split the check into its two cases, skipping unsupported features
and failing on any other error, so that each reads on its own.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi_common.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi_common.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi_common.c
index 0ef2642bd920..9a650053de0a 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi_common.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi_common.c
@@ -603,6 +603,14 @@ static int tpmi_create_device(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info,
return intel_vsec_add_aux(tpmi_info->tpmi_dev, feature_vsec_dev, name);
}
+/*
+ * Create a device for every feature in the PFS that has one.
+ *
+ * A feature that is not supported is reported as -EOPNOTSUPP and skipped.
+ * Any other error fails the driver load. intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource
+ * managed, so the devices created before such a failure need no clean up
+ * here.
+ */
static int tpmi_create_devices(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info)
{
int ret;
@@ -610,14 +618,9 @@ static int tpmi_create_devices(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info)
for (int i = 0; i < tpmi_info->feature_count; i++) {
ret = tpmi_create_device(tpmi_info, &tpmi_info->tpmi_features[i],
tpmi_info->pfs_start);
- /*
- * Fail, if the supported features fails to create device,
- * otherwise, continue. Even if one device failed to create,
- * fail the loading of driver. Since intel_vsec_add_aux()
- * is resource managed, no clean up is required for the
- * successfully created devices.
- */
- if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ continue;
+ if (ret)
return ret;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 18:23 [PATCH v2 00/19] Decouple PCI and auxbus details from Intel TPMI driver Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use static strings for the feature device names Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Pass a struct device to intel_vsec_set_mapping() Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Remove unused vsec_dev from intel_tpmi_pm_feature Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Get tpmi_info directly from the parent device Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Keep the feature resources in intel_tpmi_info Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Describe a TPMI instance by its two devices Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Drop unused arg from tpmi_set_control_base() Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Do not assume TPMI is enumerated from PCI Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Split out enumeration independent init and exit Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Split off the PCI VSEC enumeration Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Include the headers tpmi_common.c relies on Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 21:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Turn TPMI_GET_SINGLE_ENTRY_SIZE() into a function Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use guard() for tpmi_dev_lock in the status read Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 21:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use scope based cleanup in the memory dump Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Build the TPMI control words in one expression Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 21:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use DEFINE_SHOW_STORE_ATTRIBUTE() for mem_write Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 21:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use scnprintf() to build the debugfs names Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Declare the loop counters in their loops Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 21:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-25 17:55 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-24 18:23 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2026-09-24 21:19 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Describe the device creation policy on the function Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924182342.212709-20-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®