From: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
To: Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
David Lebrun <david.lebrun@uclouvain.be>,
Ahmed Abdelsalam <amsalam20@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it,
Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] seg6: fix HMAC validation when an extension header precedes the SRH
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:09:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929020908.5b62f1d0e1fca1502ede735f@uniroma2.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926-b4-seg6-hmac-transport-header-v2-1-8087b76f6375@gmail.com>
On Sat, 26 Sep 2026 20:19:27 +0900
Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com> wrote:
> seg6_hmac_validate_skb() derived the SRH from skb_transport_header().
> That only holds while the two coincide, which is not true on the
> seg6_local input path.
>
> ip6_rcv_core() leaves the transport header just past the IPv6 header.
> A Hop-by-Hop options header is consumed before the route lookup and
> advances it, but a Destination Options header is not: the seg6_local
> lwtunnel is entered through an input redirect from the route lookup,
> which bypasses the extension header handlers. The transport header
> then still points at the Destination Options header while
> seg6_get_srh() has located the real SRH further down the chain.
>
> The HMAC is therefore computed over the Destination Options header,
> and a packet carrying a valid HMAC TLV is dropped when
> seg6_require_hmac is set. Such a packet is legitimate: RFC 8200 allows
> Destination Options before a routing header, and get_srh() has walked
> the header chain since commit 5829d70b0b6c ("ipv6: sr: fix get_srh() to
> comply with IPv6 standard "RFC 8200"").
>
> With a Fragment or an Authentication header in front of the SRH, the
> same mistake also reads past the data pulled by seg6_get_srh(). This
> happens before seg6_require_hmac is read, so the default configuration
> is affected.
>
> Reproduce by giving a node a seg6local End SID with
> net.ipv6.conf.<dev>.seg6_require_hmac=1 and a key installed with
> "ip sr hmac set <keyid> sha1", then sending
>
> IPv6 -> Destination Options -> SRH (carrying a valid HMAC TLV) -> payload
>
> to that SID: it is dropped, while the same packet without the
> Destination Options header passes.
>
> Fixes: 5829d70b0b6c ("ipv6: sr: fix get_srh() to comply with IPv6 standard "RFC 8200"")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Describe the out-of-bounds read reachable with a Fragment or an
> Authentication header before the SRH (Andrea)
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260923-b4-seg6-hmac-transport-header-v1-1-3ae85dc0fdb9@gmail.com
> ---
> include/net/seg6_hmac.h | 3 ++-
> net/ipv6/exthdrs.c | 2 +-
> net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c | 5 +----
> net/ipv6/seg6_local.c | 6 +++---
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Thanks for the v2, and for addressing the v1 comment.
The code looks good to me.
For the record, the v1 Sashiko review noted another effect of the same
bug. A captured HMAC can be reused in a Destination Options header in
front of a forged SRH with no HMAC. With seg6_require_hmac=1 that forged
SRH was accepted before this patch. After the patch the HMAC check runs
on the SRH the behavior uses, not on the header in front of it.
Reviewed-by: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
Ciao,
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-26 11:19 Yuya Kusakabe
2026-09-29 0:09 ` Andrea Mayer [this message]
2026-10-01 10:58 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-10-01 11:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929020908.5b62f1d0e1fca1502ede735f@uniroma2.it \
--to=andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it \
--cc=amsalam20@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.lebrun@uclouvain.be \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it \
--cc=yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®