From: NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu,
coda@cs.cmu.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org, ntfs@lists.linux.dev,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] multiple-filesystems: prepare for changes to VFS locking
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:36:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929034158.1455429-1-neilb@ownmail.net> (raw)
I am working on changes to directory locking. The medium term goal is
to lift d_alloc_parallel() locking above i_rwsem, so d_alloc_paralle()
can be run unlocked, and consequently cannot be called when ->i_rwsem is
held.
This patch set makes small changes to a number of filesystems which each
require just one patch. Patch series for nfs, afs, cifs, fuse, cephfs
have been posted separately
The maint requirements are:
1/ that d_alloc_parallel() not be called while i_rwsem is held.
Places which currently do this can be changed to use d_alloc_trylock(),
or d_duplicate(), or change to drop and retake the parent lock.
2/ a dentry must not be d_drop()ed while an operation is ongoing, as an
unlocked d_alloc_parallel() would then be able to create a new
dentry with the same name. d_splice_alias() can now work with a
hash dentry, so often the d_drop() can simply be dropped. Other
tims it can be moved to after the operation has completed.
Though not strictly a requirement, the recent change to d_splice_alias()
means that there is nothing that d_add() which d_splice_alias() can do,
so it makes sense to deprecate d_add(). So d_add() calls have been changed
to d_splice_alias() in a few places.
The patches depend on patches recently added to the vfs tree. I would
prefer these land in that tree too with an Acked-by or similar from
relevant maintainers.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[PATCH 1/7] VFS/xfs/ntfs: drop parent lock across d_alloc_parallel()
[PATCH 2/7] shmem: use d_duplicate()
[PATCH 3/7] coda: don't d_drop() early.
[PATCH 4/7] configfs: remove d_add() calls before
[PATCH 5/7] hostfs: don't d_drop() before d_splice_alias() in
[PATCH 6/7] procfs: drop parent lock for d_alloc_parallel() in
[PATCH 7/7] ovl: stop using lookup_one() in ovl_iterate().
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 3:36 NeilBrown [this message]
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 1/7] VFS/xfs/ntfs: drop parent lock across d_alloc_parallel() in d_add_ci() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] shmem: use d_duplicate() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] coda: don't d_drop() early NeilBrown
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] configfs: remove d_add() calls before configfs_attach_group() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 5:07 ` Al Viro
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] hostfs: don't d_drop() before d_splice_alias() in hostfs_mkdir() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] procfs: drop parent lock for d_alloc_parallel() in iterate_shared() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] ovl: stop using lookup_one() in ovl_iterate() NeilBrown
2026-09-30 13:35 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-30 21:43 ` NeilBrown
2026-09-30 10:22 ` [syzbot ci] Re: multiple-filesystems: prepare for changes to VFS locking syzbot ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929034158.1455429-1-neilb@ownmail.net \
--to=neilb@ownmail.net \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=coda@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=ntfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®