From: NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu,
coda@cs.cmu.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org, ntfs@lists.linux.dev,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] VFS/xfs/ntfs: drop parent lock across d_alloc_parallel() in d_add_ci()
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:36:01 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929034158.1455429-2-neilb@ownmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929034158.1455429-1-neilb@ownmail.net>
From: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
A proposed change will invert the lock ordering between
d_alloc_parallel() and inode_lock() on the parent.
When that happens it will not be safe to call d_alloc_parallel() while
holding the parent lock - even shared.
We don't need to keep the parent lock held when d_add_ci() is run - the
VFS doesn't need it as dentry is exclusively held due to
DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP and the filesystem has finished its work.
So drop and reclaim the lock (shared or exclusive as determined by
LOOKUP_SHARED) to avoid future deadlock.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
---
Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst | 7 ++++++
fs/dcache.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
fs/ntfs/namei.c | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 2 +-
include/linux/dcache.h | 3 ++-
5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
index 4e015f1bf1f8..f6a38bd9c68e 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
@@ -1409,3 +1409,10 @@ use only if you have no alternative.
The .create inode_operation no longer receives the 'excl' arg. It must
always assume the file does not already exist. If the filesystem needs
to be involved in non-exclusive create, it should provide atomic_open.
+
+---
+
+**mandatory**
+
+d_add_ci() must now be passed the flags arguemnt that was given to ->lookup
+
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 83790c7a4dee..61e0896dc077 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -2383,6 +2383,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_obtain_root);
* @dentry: the negative dentry that was passed to the parent's lookup func
* @inode: the inode case-insensitive lookup has found
* @name: the case-exact name to be associated with the returned dentry
+ * @lookup_flags: flags passed to ->lookup
*
* This is to avoid filling the dcache with case-insensitive names to the
* same inode, only the actual correct case is stored in the dcache for
@@ -2395,9 +2396,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_obtain_root);
* the exact case, and return the spliced entry.
*/
struct dentry *d_add_ci(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
- struct qstr *name)
+ struct qstr *name, unsigned int lookup_flags)
{
struct dentry *found, *res;
+ bool must_unlock = false;
/*
* First check if a dentry matching the name already exists,
@@ -2409,24 +2411,46 @@ struct dentry *d_add_ci(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
return found;
}
if (d_in_lookup(dentry)) {
+ /*
+ * We are holding parent lock and so don't want to wait
+ * for a d_in_lookup() dentry. We can safely drop the
+ * parent lock and reclaim it as we have exclusive
+ * access to dentry as it is d_in_lookup() (so
+ * ->d_parent is stable) and we are near the end
+ * ->lookup() and will shortly drop the lock anyway.
+ * We cannot retake the lock while the new dentry is in-lookup
+ */
+ if (lookup_flags & LOOKUP_SHARED)
+ inode_unlock_shared(d_inode(dentry->d_parent));
+ else
+ inode_unlock(d_inode(dentry->d_parent));
+ must_unlock = true;
found = d_alloc_parallel(dentry->d_parent, name);
if (IS_ERR(found) || !d_in_lookup(found)) {
iput(inode);
- return found;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
} else {
found = d_alloc(dentry->d_parent, name);
if (!found) {
iput(inode);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- }
+ }
}
res = d_splice_alias(inode, found);
if (res) {
d_lookup_done(found);
dput(found);
- return res;
+ found = res;
}
+ if (!must_unlock)
+ return found;
+out_unlock:
+ d_lookup_done(dentry);
+ if (lookup_flags & LOOKUP_SHARED)
+ inode_lock_shared(d_inode(dentry->d_parent));
+ else
+ inode_lock_nested(d_inode(dentry->d_parent), I_MUTEX_PARENT);
return found;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_add_ci);
diff --git a/fs/ntfs/namei.c b/fs/ntfs/namei.c
index 7091b2496fac..61cfa4e16586 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/namei.c
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static struct dentry *ntfs_lookup(struct inode *dir_ino, struct dentry *dent,
}
nls_name.hash = full_name_hash(dent, nls_name.name, nls_name.len);
- dent = d_add_ci(dent, dent_inode, &nls_name);
+ dent = d_add_ci(dent, dent_inode, &nls_name, flags);
kfree(nls_name.name);
return dent;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index 4a3299abf774..fd480c0e4147 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ xfs_vn_ci_lookup(
/* else case-insensitive match... */
dname.name = ci_name.name;
dname.len = ci_name.len;
- dentry = d_add_ci(dentry, VFS_I(ip), &dname);
+ dentry = d_add_ci(dentry, VFS_I(ip), &dname, flags);
kfree(ci_name.name);
return dentry;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/dcache.h b/include/linux/dcache.h
index adf239f8205f..97d11f5e6a7b 100644
--- a/include/linux/dcache.h
+++ b/include/linux/dcache.h
@@ -267,7 +267,8 @@ struct dentry *d_duplicate(struct dentry *dentry);
/* weird procfs mess; *NOT* exported */
extern struct dentry * d_splice_alias_ops(struct inode *, struct dentry *,
const struct dentry_operations *);
-extern struct dentry * d_add_ci(struct dentry *, struct inode *, struct qstr *);
+extern struct dentry * d_add_ci(struct dentry *, struct inode *, struct qstr *,
+ unsigned int);
extern bool d_same_name(const struct dentry *dentry, const struct dentry *parent,
const struct qstr *name);
extern struct dentry *d_find_any_alias(struct inode *inode);
base-commit: 3879f51857325da9bf3cfb073280257cd16ae067
--
2.50.0.107.gf914562f5916.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 3:36 [PATCH 0/7] multiple-filesystems: prepare for changes to VFS locking NeilBrown
2026-09-29 3:36 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] shmem: use d_duplicate() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] coda: don't d_drop() early NeilBrown
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] configfs: remove d_add() calls before configfs_attach_group() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 5:07 ` Al Viro
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] hostfs: don't d_drop() before d_splice_alias() in hostfs_mkdir() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] procfs: drop parent lock for d_alloc_parallel() in iterate_shared() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] ovl: stop using lookup_one() in ovl_iterate() NeilBrown
2026-09-30 13:35 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-30 10:22 ` [syzbot ci] Re: multiple-filesystems: prepare for changes to VFS locking syzbot ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929034158.1455429-2-neilb@ownmail.net \
--to=neilb@ownmail.net \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=coda@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=ntfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®