* [PATCH] powerpc/syscall: Avoid atomic test_and_clear_thread_flag on fast path
@ 2026-09-29 7:17 Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM)
2026-09-29 9:50 ` Shrikanth Hegde
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) @ 2026-09-29 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: maddy, mpe, npiggin, chleroy, ritesh.list, sshegde, mkchauras,
ruanjinjie, tglx, mkchauras, ryan.roberts, linuxppc-dev,
linux-kernel
In system_call_exception(), test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET)
performs an atomic bit test-and-clear operation on every system call entry.
This introduces an unnecessary performance regression on the syscall fast
path.
Combine the TIF_SYSCALL_RET check with the unlikely error condition from
syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack() using non-atomic
test_thread_flag(). If the flag is set or entry failed, only then clear the
flag via clear_thread_flag() and return the error value.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) <mkchauras@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
index fbefe1927b10..8529827d697f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
@@ -18,14 +18,12 @@ notrace long system_call_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long r0)
long ret;
syscall_fn f;
- if (unlikely(!syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &r0))) {
+ if (unlikely(!syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &r0) ||
+ test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET))) {
clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET);
return syscall_get_error(current, regs);
}
- if (unlikely(test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET)))
- return syscall_get_error(current, regs);
-
if (unlikely(r0 >= NR_syscalls)) {
if (unlikely(trap_is_unsupported_scv(regs))) {
/* Unsupported scv vector */
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/syscall: Avoid atomic test_and_clear_thread_flag on fast path
2026-09-29 7:17 [PATCH] powerpc/syscall: Avoid atomic test_and_clear_thread_flag on fast path Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM)
@ 2026-09-29 9:50 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-09-29 12:43 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-09-29 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM)
Cc: maddy, mpe, npiggin, chleroy, ritesh.list, ruanjinjie, tglx,
mkchauras, ryan.roberts, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
On 9/29/26 12:47 PM, Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) wrote:
> In system_call_exception(), test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET)
> performs an atomic bit test-and-clear operation on every system call entry.
> This introduces an unnecessary performance regression on the syscall fast
> path.
>
Do you have numbers?
> Combine the TIF_SYSCALL_RET check with the unlikely error condition from
> syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack() using non-atomic
> test_thread_flag(). If the flag is set or entry failed, only then clear the
> flag via clear_thread_flag() and return the error value.
>
It probably needs a fixes tag.
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) <mkchauras@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> index fbefe1927b10..8529827d697f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> @@ -18,14 +18,12 @@ notrace long system_call_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long r0)
> long ret;
> syscall_fn f;
>
> - if (unlikely(!syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &r0))) {
> + if (unlikely(!syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &r0) ||
> + test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET))) {
> clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET);
> return syscall_get_error(current, regs);
> }
>
> - if (unlikely(test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET)))
I am bit surprised that test_and_clear_bit does
atomic operations even when bit is not set.
> - return syscall_get_error(current, regs);
> -
> if (unlikely(r0 >= NR_syscalls)) {
> if (unlikely(trap_is_unsupported_scv(regs))) {
> /* Unsupported scv vector */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/syscall: Avoid atomic test_and_clear_thread_flag on fast path
2026-09-29 9:50 ` Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-09-29 12:43 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-09-29 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shrikanth Hegde, Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM)
Cc: maddy, mpe, npiggin, ritesh.list, ruanjinjie, tglx, mkchauras,
ryan.roberts, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
Le 29/09/2026 à 11:50, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
>
>
> On 9/29/26 12:47 PM, Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) wrote:
>> In system_call_exception(), test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET)
>> performs an atomic bit test-and-clear operation on every system call
>> entry.
>> This introduces an unnecessary performance regression on the syscall fast
>> path.
>>
>
> Do you have numbers?
>
>> Combine the TIF_SYSCALL_RET check with the unlikely error condition from
>> syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack() using non-atomic
>> test_thread_flag(). If the flag is set or entry failed, only then
>> clear the
>> flag via clear_thread_flag() and return the error value.
>>
>
> It probably needs a fixes tag.
It is not a bug, unless we can figure out a quantified regression.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) <mkchauras@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c | 6 ++----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/
>> syscall.c
>> index fbefe1927b10..8529827d697f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
>> @@ -18,14 +18,12 @@ notrace long system_call_exception(struct pt_regs
>> *regs, unsigned long r0)
>> long ret;
>> syscall_fn f;
>> - if (unlikely(!syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs,
>> &r0))) {
>> + if (unlikely(!syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs,
>> &r0) ||
>> + test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET))) {
>> clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET);
>> return syscall_get_error(current, regs);
>> }
>> - if (unlikely(test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET)))
>
> I am bit surprised that test_and_clear_bit does
> atomic operations even when bit is not set.
It does (on ppc64 smp)
sync
1: ldarx
andc
stdcx.
bne 1b
sync
It is optimised to clear a bit that is set. When the bit is already
unset you still get the full sequence allthough it does nothing.
>
>> - return syscall_get_error(current, regs);
>> -
>> if (unlikely(r0 >= NR_syscalls)) {
>> if (unlikely(trap_is_unsupported_scv(regs))) {
>> /* Unsupported scv vector */
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-29 12:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-29 7:17 [PATCH] powerpc/syscall: Avoid atomic test_and_clear_thread_flag on fast path Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM)
2026-09-29 9:50 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-09-29 12:43 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®