From: Bowen Yu <yubowen8@huawei.com>
To: <linuxarm@huawei.com>, <liudingyuan@h-partners.com>,
<andi.shyti@kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
<acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<rafael@kernel.org>, <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>, <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
<wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>, <xuwei5@huawei.com>,
<yubowen8@huawei.com>, <ouyiyong1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] ACPI: Add stub for acpi_has_method() for !CONFIG_ACPI
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 20:13:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929121348.109556-2-yubowen8@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929121348.109556-1-yubowen8@huawei.com>
acpi_has_method() is declared in <acpi/acpi_bus.h>, which is only
included by <linux/acpi.h> when CONFIG_ACPI is enabled. Unlike the
ACPICA core helpers (acpi_evaluate_object(), acpi_format_exception(),
...) that get automatic static-inline stubs via the
ACPI_EXTERNAL_RETURN_* macros when !CONFIG_ACPI, acpi_has_method() is
Linux glue and has no stub in the #else section of <linux/acpi.h>.
This forces drivers referencing acpi_has_method() to wrap the call
site in #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI to avoid -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
on !CONFIG_ACPI builds -- a valid config for drivers that
"depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST" with no ACPI dependency.
Add a static inline stub returning false, consistent with the existing
stubs for acpi_check_dsm() and friends, so drivers can drop the #ifdef
and rely on the runtime acpi_disabled check instead.
Signed-off-by: Bowen Yu <yubowen8@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index ddacac812094..141a322435c2 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -1028,6 +1028,11 @@ static inline bool acpi_driver_match_device(struct device *dev,
return false;
}
+static inline bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
static inline bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid,
u64 rev, u64 funcs)
{
--
2.33.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 12:13 [PATCH v5 0/2] HiSilicon I2C bus recovery support Bowen Yu
2026-09-29 12:13 ` Bowen Yu [this message]
2026-09-29 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ACPI: Add stub for acpi_has_method() for !CONFIG_ACPI Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-29 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] i2c: hisi: Add I2C bus recovery support Bowen Yu
2026-10-13 13:44 ` Jie Zhan
2026-10-27 10:51 ` Andi Shyti
2026-10-30 2:39 ` yubowen (H)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929121348.109556-2-yubowen8@huawei.com \
--to=yubowen8@huawei.com \
--cc=acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liudingyuan@h-partners.com \
--cc=ouyiyong1@huawei.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
--cc=xuwei5@huawei.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®