From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Neil Brown <neil@brown.name>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
"Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/21] namespace: keep the lock on a mount that a propagated copy is moved beneath
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:52:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002-work-mount-fixes-4-v1-9-dd44b89d44ce@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002-work-mount-fixes-4-v1-0-dd44b89d44ce@kernel.org>
attach_recursive_mnt() transfers MNT_LOCKED from the top mount to the
mount that is moved beneath it with MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH. This allows the
owner of a user namespace to replace its locked /proc or its root. The
mount beneath takes on the job of covering the underlying mountpoint
allowing the top mount to be unmounted.
Consider two mount namespaces:
(H) The host H has a shared mount P with a secret in P/d
(Z) Z is a user namespace made from M. Its copy of P receives
propagation from the host's P and its copy of M's cover on P/d is
locked Z's owner must not get to see P/d.
Now (H) mounts X on P/d. This propagates into (Z). The copy of X lands
beneath (Z)'s locked cover. The locked property is transfered from (Z)'s
cover to the copy of X propagated beneath it. The cover is now unlocked.
Now (H) unmounts X again. The copy of X in (Z) gets unmounted and the
covering mount is left unlocked on top of P/d. (Z) can now unmount it:
Z: umount2(P/d) = EINVAL /* the cover is locked */
H: mount X on P/d, umount X /* both propagate into Z /*
Z: umount2(P/d) = 0 /* the cover is now unlocked */
Z: read P/d/secret = "covered-by-root" /* secret revealed */
So only transfer the locked property to the mount beneath for mounts the
caller has placed. A propagated copy that lands beneath a locked mount
is locked as well so that the mount at the bottom of the stack carries a
lock the way every check expects. The mount on top of it remains locked
to ensure that it keeps covering even if the propagated mount is
unmounted again.
Fixes: c62a4766937e ("move_mount: transfer MNT_LOCKED")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1+
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
fs/namespace.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index e74e63466c24..bb0183ec2aaf 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -2712,15 +2712,17 @@ static int attach_recursive_mnt(struct mount *source_mnt,
/*
* If @q was locked it was meant to hide
* whatever was under it. Let @child take over
- * that job and lock it, then we can unlock @q.
- * That'll allow another namespace to shed @q
- * and reveal @child. Clearly, that mounter
- * consented to this by not severing the mount
- * relationship. Otherwise, what's the point.
+ * that job and lock it. If @child is the mount
+ * the caller placed we can then unlock @q:
+ * nothing another namespace does removes it
+ * again. A propagated copy goes away when the
+ * mounter of the original unmounts it, so @q
+ * keeps its lock.
*/
if (IS_MNT_LOCKED(q)) {
child->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_LOCKED;
- q->mnt.mnt_flags &= ~MNT_LOCKED;
+ if (child == source_mnt)
+ q->mnt.mnt_flags &= ~MNT_LOCKED;
}
mnt_change_mountpoint(r, mp, q);
}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-02 13:52 [PATCH 00/21] mount: more bugfixes, trapped in the Black Lodge edition Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 01/21] namespace: unhash a dentry before detaching the mounts on it Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 02/21] namei: don't reveal overmounted entries in refwalk Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 03/21] fcntl: refuse F_SET_RW_HINT on an immutable inode Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 04/21] selftests/filesystems: check that an immutable inode takes no write hint Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 05/21] namespace: refuse an automount below a mount that is in no namespace Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 06/21] namespace: handle mount locking for automounts correctly Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 07/21] nullfs: don't update the access time Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 08/21] namespace: never expire a locked mount Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 10/21] selftests/filesystems: check that a lock lands on the right mount and stays Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 11/21] selftests/filesystems: check the atime of the empty mount namespace root Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 12/21] selftests/filesystems: check that an automount below an overlay layer is refused Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 13/21] fhandle: decide the subtree check under mount_lock Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 14/21] namespace: keep the private nullfs instance in knullfs Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 15/21] namespace: nothing is mounted on or written through knullfs Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 16/21] fsnotify: let a filesystem refuse marks on its objects Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 14:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 17/21] nullfs: refuse file locks Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 18/21] nullfs: refuse leases and delegations Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 19/21] readdir: take no inode lock on an immutable directory Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 20/21] selftests/filesystems: add a helper that holds a readdir in a page fault Christian Brauner
2026-10-02 13:52 ` [PATCH 21/21] selftests/filesystems: check that reading the root of an empty mount namespace stalls nobody Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002-work-mount-fixes-4-v1-9-dd44b89d44ce@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®