From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com,
frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
josh@joshtriplett.org, urezki@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
lianux.mm@gmail.com
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@gmail.com,
will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun@kernel.org,
npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com, dlustig@nvidia.com,
joelagnelf@nvidia.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
rdunlap@infradead.org, longman@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
qiang.zhang@linux.dev, kunwu.chan@gmail.com,
brads@mainlining.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, lkmm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 09/15] rcuscale: add hazptr scale type
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2026 01:08:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002170847.3653663-10-kunwu.chan@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002170847.3653663-1-kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Add hazptr reader and synchronize operations so that synchronize
latency can be measured alongside RCU and SRCU.
Use a small set of objects so readers do not always protect the
same target. Each reader protects the object selected by its CPU,
while the updater round-robins through the objects.
Use hazptr_synchronize() for both normal and expedited scale
operations, since hazptr has no separate expedited operation.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250625031101.12555-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
---
kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
index 1097ec15879c..5aca31c3c01d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include <linux/torture.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
+#include <linux/hazptr.h>
#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
#include "rcu.h"
@@ -418,6 +419,71 @@ static struct rcu_scale_ops tasks_tracing_ops = {
#endif // #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAZPTR_TORTURE_TEST)
+
+#define HAZPTR_SCALE_NR_OBJS 8
+static int hazptr_scale_obj[HAZPTR_SCALE_NR_OBJS];
+static atomic_t hazptr_scale_sync_idx = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+
+struct hazptr_scale_state {
+ struct hazptr_ctx ctx;
+ void *addr;
+};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hazptr_scale_state, hazptr_scale_state);
+
+static int hazptr_scale_read_lock(void)
+{
+ struct hazptr_scale_state *state = this_cpu_ptr(&hazptr_scale_state);
+ int idx = smp_processor_id() % HAZPTR_SCALE_NR_OBJS;
+ void *ptr = &hazptr_scale_obj[idx];
+
+ state->addr = hazptr_acquire(&state->ctx, &ptr);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void hazptr_scale_read_unlock(int idx)
+{
+ struct hazptr_scale_state *state = this_cpu_ptr(&hazptr_scale_state);
+
+ hazptr_release(&state->ctx, state->addr);
+}
+
+static unsigned long hazptr_scale_completed(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void hazptr_scale_sync(void)
+{
+ int idx = atomic_fetch_inc(&hazptr_scale_sync_idx) % HAZPTR_SCALE_NR_OBJS;
+
+ hazptr_synchronize(&hazptr_scale_obj[idx]);
+}
+
+static void hazptr_scale_sync_exp(void)
+{
+ int idx = atomic_fetch_inc(&hazptr_scale_sync_idx) % HAZPTR_SCALE_NR_OBJS;
+
+ hazptr_synchronize(&hazptr_scale_obj[idx]);
+}
+
+static struct rcu_scale_ops hazptr_scale_ops = {
+ .ptype = 0,
+ .readlock = hazptr_scale_read_lock,
+ .readunlock = hazptr_scale_read_unlock,
+ .get_gp_seq = hazptr_scale_completed,
+ .gp_diff = NULL,
+ .exp_completed = hazptr_scale_completed,
+ .sync = hazptr_scale_sync,
+ .exp_sync = hazptr_scale_sync_exp,
+ .name = "hazptr",
+};
+
+#define HAZPTR_SCALE_OPS &hazptr_scale_ops,
+#else
+#define HAZPTR_SCALE_OPS
+#endif
+
static unsigned long rcuscale_seq_diff(unsigned long new, unsigned long old)
{
if (!cur_ops->gp_diff)
@@ -1110,7 +1176,9 @@ rcu_scale_init(void)
long i;
long j;
static struct rcu_scale_ops *scale_ops[] = {
- &rcu_ops, &srcu_ops, &srcud_ops, TASKS_OPS TASKS_RUDE_OPS TASKS_TRACING_OPS
+ &rcu_ops, &srcu_ops, &srcud_ops,
+ TASKS_OPS TASKS_RUDE_OPS TASKS_TRACING_OPS
+ HAZPTR_SCALE_OPS
};
if (!torture_init_begin(scale_type, verbose))
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-02 17:08 [PATCH RFC v2 00/15] hazptr: batch synchronize operations through a shared scan Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/15] hazptr: add shared scan kthread Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/15] hazptr: use Bloom filter for shared scan waiters Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/15] hazptr: scan all per-CPU slots before overflow lists Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/15] hazptr: add scoped_guard() support Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/15] hazptr: add debug option to force the acquire slow path Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/15] hazptr: elide redundant first drain pass Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/15] Documentation/litmus-tests: add hazptr wildcard-flip escape test Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/15] locking/lockdep: use hazptr to wait for dynamic key lookups Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` Kunwu Chan [this message]
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/15] hazptr: fix kernel-doc of hazptr_release() Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/15] Documentation/litmus-tests: add hazptr acquire-before-scan test Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/15] hazptrtorture: add slowpath and lockdep scenarios Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 13/15] hazptrtorture: add READERS4 and READERS0 torture configs Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 14/15] hazptrtorture: add 128- and 256-CPU configs Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 15/15] selftests/rcutorture: add hazptr torture test script Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:12 ` [PATCH RFC v2 00/15] hazptr: batch synchronize operations through a shared scan Bradley Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002170847.3653663-10-kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--to=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=brads@mainlining.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®