mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com,
	frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, urezki@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
	lianux.mm@gmail.com
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@gmail.com,
	will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun@kernel.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
	luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com, dlustig@nvidia.com,
	joelagnelf@nvidia.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, longman@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	qiang.zhang@linux.dev, kunwu.chan@gmail.com,
	brads@mainlining.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, lkmm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 03/15] hazptr: scan all per-CPU slots before overflow lists
Date: Sat,  3 Oct 2026 01:08:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002170847.3653663-4-kunwu.chan@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002170847.3653663-1-kunwu.chan@gmail.com>

Boqun Feng pointed out that a promote racing a scan can cause the
scan to miss a hazard pointer: hazptr_promote_to_backup_slot()
chains the backup slot into an overflow list before clearing the
per-CPU slot, so the scan must observe the old location before the
new one.  The scan currently visits each CPU's overflow lists right
after that CPU's per-CPU slots, so a promote that moves a hazard
pointer from a per-CPU slot of a later-scanned CPU into an overflow
list of an earlier-scanned CPU can be missed.

The direct two-phase scan has a related race because the overflow
list selection follows the wildcard phase: a promote racing the
wildcard flip can move a backup slot to the list not covered by the
second phase.

Fix this by scanning all per-CPU slots before any overflow-list
slot, in both the shared-scan walk and the direct fallback scan.
Give the overflow lists a flip phase of their own, independent of
the wildcard, so each list is scanned while it is the non-live one:
new backup slots are chained to the other list, preserving forward
progress.

The same race was also addressed by Mathieu Desnoyers.

Fixes: 0b8114b25f17 ("hazptr: Implement two-phase wildcard scan")
Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260925195958.4766-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com/
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/hazptr.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/hazptr.c b/kernel/hazptr.c
index 900ba35de2cb..799784f698ed 100644
--- a/kernel/hazptr.c
+++ b/kernel/hazptr.c
@@ -23,13 +23,20 @@
  * The current hazard pointer wildcard. Flips between 1UL and 2UL to guarantee
  * hazptr_synchronize forward progress even with a steady stream of readers.
  * This wildcard value is used by acquire to temporarily tag the per-CPU slots.
- * This also affects the overflow list selection: the current list used by
- * readers is array[(unsigned long) hazptr_wildcard - 1].
  */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(hazptr_wildcard_lock);	/* Protect the wildcard flip. */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(hazptr_phase_lock);
+/* Protect the wildcard and overflow-list phase flips. */
 void *hazptr_wildcard = (void *) 1UL;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hazptr_wildcard);
 
+/*
+ * The current overflow list phase. Independent from the wildcard so that the
+ * overflow list scan can be placed after the per-CPU slot scan while still
+ * scanning the non-live list: the current list used by readers is
+ * array[hazptr_overflow_list_phase].
+ */
+static unsigned int hazptr_overflow_list_phase;
+
 struct hazptr_overflow_list {
 	raw_spinlock_t lock;		/* Lock protecting overflow list and list generation. */
 	struct hlist_head head;		/* Overflow list head. */
@@ -59,6 +66,12 @@ void *flip_wildcard(void *wildcard)
 	return ((unsigned long) wildcard == 1UL) ? (void *) 2UL : (void *) 1UL;
 }
 
+static
+unsigned int flip_list_phase(unsigned int phase)
+{
+	return 1 - phase;
+}
+
 static
 bool is_wildcard(void *addr)
 {
@@ -184,15 +197,12 @@ void hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(int cpu, void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
 }
 
 static
-void hazptr_scan_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
+void hazptr_scan_cpu_slots_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
 {
-	unsigned int scan_idx = (unsigned long) scan_wildcard - 1;
 	int cpu;
 
 	/* Scan all CPUs slots. */
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = per_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip, cpu);
-
 		/*
 		 * Scan CPU slots.
 		 * Forward progress against recurring wildcards is guaranteed
@@ -205,12 +215,22 @@ void hazptr_scan_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
 		 * to acquire that same hazard pointer value.
 		 */
 		hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(cpu, addr, scan_wildcard);
+	}
+}
+
+static
+void hazptr_scan_overflow_list_period(void *addr, unsigned int scan_idx)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	/*
+	 * Scan backup slots in percpu overflow lists.
+	 * Forward progress is guaranteed by scanning one list
+	 * while new elements are added into the other list.
+	 */
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = per_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip, cpu);
 
-		/*
-		 * Scan backup slots in percpu overflow lists.
-		 * Forward progress is guaranteed by scanning one list
-		 * while new elements are added into the other list.
-		 */
 		hazptr_synchronize_overflow_list(&overflow_list_flip->array[scan_idx], addr);
 	}
 }
@@ -285,10 +305,13 @@ static struct hazptr_scan_state hazptr_scan;
  * Walk all slots and return true if @watch is present.  If @bloom
  * is non-NULL, record observed non-wildcard addresses in it.
  *
- * Per-CPU slots are examined before overflow-list slots on each CPU
- * to preserve the acquisition ordering required by the promote path:
- * synchronize must observe the per-CPU slot release before the
- * overflow-list entry can be missed.
+ * All per-CPU slots are examined before any overflow-list slot: a
+ * promote (hazptr_detach() or a context switch) moves a hazard
+ * pointer from a per-CPU slot to an overflow list by chaining the
+ * backup slot before clearing the per-CPU slot, see
+ * hazptr_promote_to_backup_slot().  Therefore the scan must observe
+ * the old location before the new location for every slot/list
+ * pair, including pairs on different CPUs.
  */
 static bool hazptr_scan_walk(void *watch, struct hazptr_bloom *bloom)
 {
@@ -297,9 +320,9 @@ static bool hazptr_scan_walk(void *watch, struct hazptr_bloom *bloom)
 	if (bloom)
 		hazptr_bloom_reset(bloom);
 
+	/* Scan all per-CPU slots before any overflow-list slot. */
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct hazptr_percpu_slots *percpu_slots = per_cpu_ptr(&hazptr_percpu_slots, cpu);
-		struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = per_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip, cpu);
 		unsigned int idx;
 
 		for (idx = 0; idx < NR_HAZPTR_PERCPU_SLOTS; idx++) {
@@ -313,6 +336,10 @@ static bool hazptr_scan_walk(void *watch, struct hazptr_bloom *bloom)
 			if (bloom && v && !is_wildcard(v))
 				hazptr_bloom_add(bloom, v);
 		}
+	}
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = per_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip, cpu);
+
 		for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
 			struct hazptr_overflow_list *list = &overflow_list_flip->array[i];
 			struct hazptr_backup_slot *b;
@@ -359,14 +386,14 @@ static void hazptr_scan_do_cycle(void)
 	struct hazptr_waiter *w, *n;
 	LIST_HEAD(done);
 
-	mutex_lock(&hazptr_wildcard_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&hazptr_phase_lock);
 
 	mutex_lock(&hazptr_scan.lock);
 	list_splice_tail_init(&hazptr_scan.pending, &hazptr_scan.scanning);
 	mutex_unlock(&hazptr_scan.lock);
 
 	if (list_empty(&hazptr_scan.scanning)) {
-		mutex_unlock(&hazptr_wildcard_lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&hazptr_phase_lock);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -391,7 +418,7 @@ static void hazptr_scan_do_cycle(void)
 			list_move(&w->node, &done);
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&hazptr_wildcard_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&hazptr_phase_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(w, n, &done, node) {
 		list_del_init(&w->node);
@@ -463,6 +490,7 @@ static void hazptr_synchronize_queued(void *addr)
 void hazptr_synchronize(void *addr)
 {
 	void *scan_wildcard;
+	unsigned int scan_list_phase;
 
 	/*
 	 * Busy-wait should only be done from preemptible context.
@@ -486,18 +514,30 @@ void hazptr_synchronize(void *addr)
 	}
 
 	/* Fallback: use the direct scan path. */
-	guard(mutex)(&hazptr_wildcard_lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&hazptr_phase_lock);
 	scan_wildcard = flip_wildcard(hazptr_wildcard);
-	hazptr_scan_period(addr, scan_wildcard);
+	/* Scan per-CPU slots. */
+	hazptr_scan_cpu_slots_period(addr, scan_wildcard);
 	WRITE_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard, scan_wildcard);	/* Flip the current wildcard. */
-	hazptr_scan_period(addr, flip_wildcard(scan_wildcard));
+	hazptr_scan_cpu_slots_period(addr, flip_wildcard(scan_wildcard));
+
+	/*
+	 * Scan overflow lists *after* scanning all per-CPU slots, see
+	 * hazptr_promote_to_backup_slot().  Flip the overflow list phase
+	 * between the two lists so that each list is scanned while it is
+	 * the non-live one.
+	 */
+	scan_list_phase = flip_list_phase(hazptr_overflow_list_phase);
+	hazptr_scan_overflow_list_period(addr, scan_list_phase);
+	WRITE_ONCE(hazptr_overflow_list_phase, scan_list_phase);
+	hazptr_scan_overflow_list_period(addr, flip_list_phase(scan_list_phase));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hazptr_synchronize);
 
 struct hazptr_slot *hazptr_chain_backup_slot(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx)
 {
 	struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip);
-	unsigned int list_idx = (unsigned long) READ_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard) - 1;
+	unsigned int list_idx = READ_ONCE(hazptr_overflow_list_phase);
 	struct hazptr_overflow_list *overflow_list = &overflow_list_flip->array[list_idx];
 	struct hazptr_slot *slot = &ctx->backup_slot.slot;
 
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-02 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-02 17:08 [PATCH RFC v2 00/15] hazptr: batch synchronize operations through a shared scan Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/15] hazptr: add shared scan kthread Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/15] hazptr: use Bloom filter for shared scan waiters Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` Kunwu Chan [this message]
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/15] hazptr: add scoped_guard() support Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/15] hazptr: add debug option to force the acquire slow path Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/15] hazptr: elide redundant first drain pass Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/15] Documentation/litmus-tests: add hazptr wildcard-flip escape test Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/15] locking/lockdep: use hazptr to wait for dynamic key lookups Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/15] rcuscale: add hazptr scale type Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/15] hazptr: fix kernel-doc of hazptr_release() Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/15] Documentation/litmus-tests: add hazptr acquire-before-scan test Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/15] hazptrtorture: add slowpath and lockdep scenarios Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 13/15] hazptrtorture: add READERS4 and READERS0 torture configs Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 14/15] hazptrtorture: add 128- and 256-CPU configs Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 15/15] selftests/rcutorture: add hazptr torture test script Kunwu Chan
2026-10-02 17:12 ` [PATCH RFC v2 00/15] hazptr: batch synchronize operations through a shared scan Bradley Morgan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261002170847.3653663-4-kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
    --to=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=brads@mainlining.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®