mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
Cc: dsahern@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
	jiri@resnulli.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com,
	jjzuming@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Serialize netconf GET requests with RTNL
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 10:30:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008073001.GA1257678@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pm-ip-core-objects-candidate-0002-v3-4af089192b0b62b40b9c@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 02:32:18PM +0800, Cen Zhang wrote:
> An in_device returned by in_dev_get() must stay alive until
> inet_netconf_get_devconf() finishes reading its cnf. However, the helper
> samples dev->ip_ptr under RCU and unconditionally increments refcnt,
> then returns the pointer outside RCU without checking whether the count
> was already zero. The net_device reference held by the request does not
> retain the separately allocated in_device.
> 
> A down interface without IPv4 addresses or multicast owners can have
> only the ip_ptr publication reference. Lowering its MTU below
> IPV4_MIN_MTU invokes inetdev_destroy() through the RTNL-held
> NETDEV_CHANGEMTU notifier. RTM_GETNETCONF runs without RTNL, allowing
> the final put to follow its pointer sample but precede its increment:
> 
>   RTM_GETNETCONF                   MTU change (RTNL held)
>   in_dev_get():
>     rcu_read_lock()
>     sample dev->ip_ptr
>                                   inetdev_destroy():
>                                     clear dev->ip_ptr
>                                     in_dev_put(): refcnt -> 0
>                                     call_rcu(in_dev_free_rcu)
>     refcount_inc() from zero
>     rcu_read_unlock()
>                                   in_dev_free_rcu(): kfree()
>   inet_netconf_fill_devconf():
>     read in_dev->cnf
> 
> The zero-count increment warns and saturates the refcount, but cannot
> cancel the queued free. Once the request leaves RCU, the callback can
> free the attachment before the configuration read, causing a
> use-after-free. Restoring a valid MTU can publish a new attachment on
> the same device while the request still holds the old pointer.
> 
> Drop RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED so rtnetlink holds RTNL from lookup through
> reply construction and reference release. This serializes the request
> with inetdev_destroy(), preventing the publication reference from being
> dropped during acquisition or use. The dump handler already holds RCU
> through its configuration reads and keeps RTNL_FLAG_DUMP_UNLOCKED.
> 
> KASAN report as below:

[...]

> 
> Fixes: bbcf91053bb6 ("inet: do not use RTNL in inet_netconf_get_devconf()")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>

The correct fix is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() in in_dev_get(), in a
similar fashion to commit 0e243671bc7b ("ipv6: prevent in6_dev_get()
from resurrecting inet6_dev"). Please base your v2 on the following
submission and the feedback I provided:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260815172032.79740-1-baul.lee@xbow.com/

And please read:

https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html

Notably:

1. "designate your patch to a tree - [PATCH net] or [PATCH net-next]"
2. "don’t repost your patches within one 24h period"

Also, trim the traces (preferably decoded) to what is actually useful:

https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/submitting-patches.html#backtraces-in-commit-messages

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-08  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-08  6:32 Cen Zhang
2026-10-08  7:30 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2026-10-08  8:33   ` Cen Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261008073001.GA1257678@shredder \
    --to=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=jjzuming@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®