mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index name hash values
@ 2026-10-08 12:27 Joseph Qi
  2026-10-08 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed xattr " Joseph Qi
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Qi @ 2026-10-08 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, Heming Zhao, Anderson Ferneda
  Cc: Mark Fasheh, Joel Becker, ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel

Commit 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned") set
-funsigned-char globally, which changed the result of the naked 'char'
load in str2hashbuf():

	val = msg[i] + (val << 8);

A name byte >= 0x80 used to sign-extend and now zero-extends, so
ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash() computes a different hash pair for every name
containing one.  The pair is written into the dx leaf when the entry is
created, so an index built by an older kernel no longer matches and
ocfs2_dx_dir_search() returns -ENOENT for a name that readdir still
lists.

Search with the current unsigned hash and, on a miss, retry with the
legacy signed one, as ext4 does in commit f3bbac32475b2 ("ext4: deal
with legacy signed xattr name hash values").  New entries are always
indexed under the unsigned hash.  Skip the retry when the two hashes
are equal, so that a miss on an ASCII name does not walk the index
twice.

The retry costs a second walk of the dx tree, so a negative lookup of a
name containing a byte >= 0x80 does twice the work.  That is bounded and
worth it, and directories whose dx root is still inline pay nothing
extra, since there the retry only rescans the root block that is already
loaded.  Nothing retires it at runtime: a legacy entry keeps its legacy
hash, because neither deleting nor updating an entry rewrites the dx
hash, and the only code that rehashes existing dirents is
ocfs2_expand_inline_dir() on the inline to extent conversion.
Rebuilding the index offline is what removes the cost for good.

Also spell out the signedness in str2hashbuf() instead of leaving the
current hash to -funsigned-char, as commit 854f0912f813 ("ext4: make
xattr char unsignedness in hash explicit") did, so that both variants
stay correct if this is backported to a kernel without the flag.

Reported-by: Anderson Ferneda <anderson.ferneda@braza.com.br>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/CP5P284MB2780AC2C3C2AB2CF2B6CB7AFBE942@CP5P284MB2780.BRAP284.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/
Exposed-by: 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
index 55c4a305a282..3f159a20a248 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
@@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ static void TEA_transform(__u32 buf[4], __u32 const in[])
 	buf[1] += b1;
 }
 
-static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num)
+static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num,
+			bool legacy_signed)
 {
 	__u32	pad, val;
 	int	i;
@@ -235,7 +236,10 @@ static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num)
 	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
 		if ((i % 4) == 0)
 			val = pad;
-		val = msg[i] + (val << 8);
+		if (legacy_signed)
+			val = (signed char)msg[i] + (val << 8);
+		else
+			val = (unsigned char)msg[i] + (val << 8);
 		if ((i % 4) == 3) {
 			*buf++ = val;
 			val = pad;
@@ -248,8 +252,9 @@ static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num)
 		*buf++ = pad;
 }
 
-static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
-				   struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo)
+static void __ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name,
+				     int len, struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo,
+				     bool legacy_signed)
 {
 	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb);
 	const char	*p;
@@ -279,7 +284,7 @@ static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
 
 	p = name;
 	while (len > 0) {
-		str2hashbuf(p, len, in, 4);
+		str2hashbuf(p, len, in, 4, legacy_signed);
 		TEA_transform(buf, in);
 		len -= 16;
 		p += 16;
@@ -290,6 +295,19 @@ static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
 	hinfo->minor_hash = buf[1];
 }
 
+static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
+				   struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo)
+{
+	__ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, len, hinfo, false);
+}
+
+static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash_signed(struct inode *dir, const char *name,
+					  int len,
+					  struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo)
+{
+	__ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, len, hinfo, true);
+}
+
 /*
  * bh passed here can be an inode block or a dir data block, depending
  * on the inode inline data flag.
@@ -1021,10 +1039,10 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup(struct inode *inode,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
-			       struct inode *dir,
-			       struct ocfs2_dx_root_block *dx_root,
-			       struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *res)
+static int __ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
+				 struct inode *dir,
+				 struct ocfs2_dx_root_block *dx_root,
+				 struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *res)
 {
 	int ret, i, found;
 	u64 phys;
@@ -1037,8 +1055,6 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
 	struct ocfs2_extent_list *dr_el;
 	struct ocfs2_dx_entry_list *entry_list;
 
-	ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, namelen, &res->dl_hinfo);
-
 	if (ocfs2_dx_root_inline(dx_root)) {
 		entry_list = &dx_root->dr_entries;
 		goto search;
@@ -1135,6 +1151,44 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
+			       struct inode *dir,
+			       struct ocfs2_dx_root_block *dx_root,
+			       struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *res)
+{
+	struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo legacy;
+	int ret;
+
+	ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, namelen, &res->dl_hinfo);
+
+	ret = __ocfs2_dx_dir_search(name, namelen, dir, dx_root, res);
+	if (ret != -ENOENT)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * Nothing under the current hash.  The entry may have been indexed by
+	 * an older kernel, which sign-extended the name bytes when hashing.
+	 * New entries are always indexed under the unsigned hash, so only fall
+	 * back to the legacy signed one when it can actually differ: an ASCII
+	 * name hashes the same either way, and a genuine miss on one should
+	 * not have to walk the index twice.
+	 */
+	ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash_signed(dir, name, namelen, &legacy);
+	if (legacy.major_hash == res->dl_hinfo.major_hash &&
+	    legacy.minor_hash == res->dl_hinfo.minor_hash)
+		return ret;
+
+	res->dl_hinfo = legacy;
+
+	ret = __ocfs2_dx_dir_search(name, namelen, dir, dx_root, res);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	pr_warn_once("ocfs2: directory index with signed name hash\n");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int ocfs2_find_entry_dx(const char *name, int namelen,
 			       struct inode *dir,
 			       struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *lookup)
-- 
2.39.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed xattr name hash values
  2026-10-08 12:27 [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index name hash values Joseph Qi
@ 2026-10-08 12:27 ` Joseph Qi
  2026-10-09  3:18   ` Heming Zhao
  2026-10-08 17:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index " Andrew Morton
  2026-10-09  2:58 ` Heming Zhao
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Qi @ 2026-10-08 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, Heming Zhao, Anderson Ferneda
  Cc: Mark Fasheh, Joel Becker, ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel

Commit 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned") set
-funsigned-char globally, which changed the result of the naked 'char'
load in ocfs2_xattr_name_hash():

	hash = (hash << OCFS2_HASH_SHIFT) ^
	       (hash >> (8*sizeof(hash) - OCFS2_HASH_SHIFT)) ^
	       *name++;

A name byte >= 0x80 used to sign-extend and now zero-extends, so the
hash no longer matches the xe_name_hash an older kernel stored.  An
indexed xattr tree is searched by that hash alone, and both the bucket
binary search and the entry scan within it stop as soon as the wanted
hash falls below an entry's, so the entry is never reached: getxattr,
setxattr and removexattr return -ENODATA for a name that listxattr
still lists.

Search with the current unsigned hash and, on a miss, retry with the
legacy signed one, as ext4 does in commit f3bbac32475b2 ("ext4: deal
with legacy signed xattr name hash values").  New entries are always
stored under the unsigned hash.  Skip the retry when the two hashes are
equal, so that a miss on an ASCII name does not walk the tree twice.

A miss is not empty handed: ocfs2_xattr_bucket_find() leaves xs->bucket
holding the bucket a new entry would go into.  So after a double miss
drop it and search once more with the unsigned hash, otherwise a new
entry would be placed by its legacy hash and stored under its unsigned
one, breaking the ordering the search relies on.

Only indexed trees are affected; inline xattrs and non-indexed xattr
blocks compare names with memcmp and never look at the hash.

Also spell out the signedness instead of leaving the current hash to
-funsigned-char, as commit 854f0912f813 ("ext4: make xattr char
unsignedness in hash explicit") did, so that both variants stay correct
if this is backported to a kernel without the flag.

Exposed-by: 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
index a428fe908116..0834883ae971 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
@@ -601,9 +601,10 @@ static inline const char *ocfs2_xattr_prefix(int name_index)
 	return handler ? xattr_prefix(handler) : NULL;
 }
 
-static u32 ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(struct inode *inode,
-				 const char *name,
-				 int name_len)
+static u32 __ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(struct inode *inode,
+				   const char *name,
+				   int name_len,
+				   bool legacy_signed)
 {
 	/* Get hash value of uuid from super block */
 	u32 hash = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb)->uuid_hash;
@@ -612,13 +613,30 @@ static u32 ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(struct inode *inode,
 	/* hash extended attribute name */
 	for (i = 0; i < name_len; i++) {
 		hash = (hash << OCFS2_HASH_SHIFT) ^
-		       (hash >> (8*sizeof(hash) - OCFS2_HASH_SHIFT)) ^
-		       *name++;
+		       (hash >> (8*sizeof(hash) - OCFS2_HASH_SHIFT));
+		if (legacy_signed)
+			hash ^= (signed char)name[i];
+		else
+			hash ^= (unsigned char)name[i];
 	}
 
 	return hash;
 }
 
+static u32 ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(struct inode *inode,
+				 const char *name,
+				 int name_len)
+{
+	return __ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, name_len, false);
+}
+
+static u32 ocfs2_xattr_name_hash_signed(struct inode *inode,
+					const char *name,
+					int name_len)
+{
+	return __ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, name_len, true);
+}
+
 static int ocfs2_xattr_entry_real_size(int name_len, size_t value_len)
 {
 	return namevalue_size(name_len, value_len) +
@@ -4304,11 +4322,12 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_bucket_find(struct inode *inode,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(struct inode *inode,
-					struct buffer_head *root_bh,
-					int name_index,
-					const char *name,
-					struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs)
+static int __ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(struct inode *inode,
+					  struct buffer_head *root_bh,
+					  int name_index,
+					  const char *name,
+					  u32 name_hash,
+					  struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs)
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct ocfs2_xattr_block *xb =
@@ -4317,7 +4336,6 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(struct inode *inode,
 	struct ocfs2_extent_list *el = &xb_root->xt_list;
 	u64 p_blkno = 0;
 	u32 first_hash, num_clusters = 0;
-	u32 name_hash = ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, strlen(name));
 
 	if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) == 0)
 		return -ENODATA;
@@ -4348,6 +4366,59 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(struct inode *inode,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(struct inode *inode,
+					struct buffer_head *root_bh,
+					int name_index,
+					const char *name,
+					struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs)
+{
+	u32 name_hash, legacy_hash;
+	int name_len = strlen(name);
+	int ret;
+
+	name_hash = ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, name_len);
+
+	ret = __ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(inode, root_bh, name_index, name,
+					     name_hash, xs);
+	if (ret != -ENODATA)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * Nothing under the current hash.  The entry may have been stored by
+	 * an older kernel, which sign-extended the name bytes when hashing.
+	 * Skip the retry when the two hashes are equal, so that a name made
+	 * only of ASCII does not have to walk the tree twice.
+	 */
+	legacy_hash = ocfs2_xattr_name_hash_signed(inode, name, name_len);
+	if (legacy_hash == name_hash)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * A miss still leaves xs->bucket holding the bucket a new entry would
+	 * be inserted into, so drop it before searching again.
+	 */
+	ocfs2_xattr_bucket_relse(xs->bucket);
+
+	ret = __ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(inode, root_bh, name_index, name,
+					     legacy_hash, xs);
+	if (!ret) {
+		pr_warn_once("ocfs2: xattr tree with signed name hash\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+	if (ret != -ENODATA)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * Not under either hash.  Restore the unsigned placement, since that
+	 * is where a new entry is stored: leaving the bucket where the legacy
+	 * hash put it would break the ordering the search relies on.
+	 */
+	ocfs2_xattr_bucket_relse(xs->bucket);
+
+	return __ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(inode, root_bh, name_index, name,
+					      name_hash, xs);
+}
+
 static int ocfs2_iterate_xattr_buckets(struct inode *inode,
 				       u64 blkno,
 				       u32 clusters,
-- 
2.39.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index name hash values
  2026-10-08 12:27 [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index name hash values Joseph Qi
  2026-10-08 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed xattr " Joseph Qi
@ 2026-10-08 17:08 ` Andrew Morton
  2026-10-09  2:58 ` Heming Zhao
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2026-10-08 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joseph Qi
  Cc: Heming Zhao, Anderson Ferneda, Mark Fasheh, Joel Becker,
	ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel

On Thu,  8 Oct 2026 20:27:42 +0800 Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> Commit 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned") set
> -funsigned-char globally, which changed the result of the naked 'char'
> load in str2hashbuf():
> 
> 	val = msg[i] + (val << 8);
> 
> A name byte >= 0x80 used to sign-extend and now zero-extends, so
> ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash() computes a different hash pair for every name
> containing one.  The pair is written into the dx leaf when the entry is
> created, so an index built by an older kernel no longer matches and
> ocfs2_dx_dir_search() returns -ENOENT for a name that readdir still
> lists.
> 
> Search with the current unsigned hash and, on a miss, retry with the
> legacy signed one, as ext4 does in commit f3bbac32475b2 ("ext4: deal
> with legacy signed xattr name hash values").  New entries are always
> indexed under the unsigned hash.  Skip the retry when the two hashes
> are equal, so that a miss on an ASCII name does not walk the index
> twice.
> 
> The retry costs a second walk of the dx tree, so a negative lookup of a
> name containing a byte >= 0x80 does twice the work.  That is bounded and
> worth it, and directories whose dx root is still inline pay nothing
> extra, since there the retry only rescans the root block that is already
> loaded.  Nothing retires it at runtime: a legacy entry keeps its legacy
> hash, because neither deleting nor updating an entry rewrites the dx
> hash, and the only code that rehashes existing dirents is
> ocfs2_expand_inline_dir() on the inline to extent conversion.
> Rebuilding the index offline is what removes the cost for good.
> 
> Also spell out the signedness in str2hashbuf() instead of leaving the
> current hash to -funsigned-char, as commit 854f0912f813 ("ext4: make
> xattr char unsignedness in hash explicit") did, so that both variants
> stay correct if this is backported to a kernel without the flag.
> 
> Reported-by: Anderson Ferneda <anderson.ferneda@braza.com.br>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/CP5P284MB2780AC2C3C2AB2CF2B6CB7AFBE942@CP5P284MB2780.BRAP284.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/
> Exposed-by: 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 55c4a305a282..3f159a20a248 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ static void TEA_transform(__u32 buf[4], __u32 const in[])
>  	buf[1] += b1;
>  }
>  
> -static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num)
> +static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num,
> +			bool legacy_signed)
>  {
>  	__u32	pad, val;
>  	int	i;
> @@ -235,7 +236,10 @@ static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num)
>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>  		if ((i % 4) == 0)
>  			val = pad;
> -		val = msg[i] + (val << 8);
> +		if (legacy_signed)
> +			val = (signed char)msg[i] + (val << 8);
> +		else
> +			val = (unsigned char)msg[i] + (val << 8);
>  		if ((i % 4) == 3) {
>  			*buf++ = val;
>  			val = pad;
> @@ -248,8 +252,9 @@ static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num)
>  		*buf++ = pad;
>  }
>  
> -static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
> -				   struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo)
> +static void __ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name,
> +				     int len, struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo,
> +				     bool legacy_signed)
>  {
>  	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb);
>  	const char	*p;
> @@ -279,7 +284,7 @@ static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
>  
>  	p = name;
>  	while (len > 0) {
> -		str2hashbuf(p, len, in, 4);
> +		str2hashbuf(p, len, in, 4, legacy_signed);
>  		TEA_transform(buf, in);
>  		len -= 16;
>  		p += 16;
> @@ -290,6 +295,19 @@ static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
>  	hinfo->minor_hash = buf[1];
>  }
>  
> +static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
> +				   struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo)
> +{
> +	__ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, len, hinfo, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash_signed(struct inode *dir, const char *name,
> +					  int len,
> +					  struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo)
> +{
> +	__ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, len, hinfo, true);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * bh passed here can be an inode block or a dir data block, depending
>   * on the inode inline data flag.
> @@ -1021,10 +1039,10 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup(struct inode *inode,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
> -			       struct inode *dir,
> -			       struct ocfs2_dx_root_block *dx_root,
> -			       struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *res)
> +static int __ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
> +				 struct inode *dir,
> +				 struct ocfs2_dx_root_block *dx_root,
> +				 struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *res)
>  {
>  	int ret, i, found;
>  	u64 phys;
> @@ -1037,8 +1055,6 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
>  	struct ocfs2_extent_list *dr_el;
>  	struct ocfs2_dx_entry_list *entry_list;
>  
> -	ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, namelen, &res->dl_hinfo);
> -
>  	if (ocfs2_dx_root_inline(dx_root)) {
>  		entry_list = &dx_root->dr_entries;
>  		goto search;
> @@ -1135,6 +1151,44 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
> +			       struct inode *dir,
> +			       struct ocfs2_dx_root_block *dx_root,
> +			       struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *res)
> +{
> +	struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo legacy;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, namelen, &res->dl_hinfo);
> +
> +	ret = __ocfs2_dx_dir_search(name, namelen, dir, dx_root, res);
> +	if (ret != -ENOENT)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Nothing under the current hash.  The entry may have been indexed by
> +	 * an older kernel, which sign-extended the name bytes when hashing.
> +	 * New entries are always indexed under the unsigned hash, so only fall
> +	 * back to the legacy signed one when it can actually differ: an ASCII
> +	 * name hashes the same either way, and a genuine miss on one should
> +	 * not have to walk the index twice.
> +	 */
> +	ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash_signed(dir, name, namelen, &legacy);
> +	if (legacy.major_hash == res->dl_hinfo.major_hash &&
> +	    legacy.minor_hash == res->dl_hinfo.minor_hash)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	res->dl_hinfo = legacy;
> +
> +	ret = __ocfs2_dx_dir_search(name, namelen, dir, dx_root, res);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	pr_warn_once("ocfs2: directory index with signed name hash\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int ocfs2_find_entry_dx(const char *name, int namelen,
>  			       struct inode *dir,
>  			       struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *lookup)
> -- 
> 2.39.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index name hash values
  2026-10-08 12:27 [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index name hash values Joseph Qi
  2026-10-08 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed xattr " Joseph Qi
  2026-10-08 17:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index " Andrew Morton
@ 2026-10-09  2:58 ` Heming Zhao
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heming Zhao @ 2026-10-09  2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joseph Qi
  Cc: Andrew Morton, Anderson Ferneda, Mark Fasheh, Joel Becker,
	ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel

On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 08:27:42PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> Commit 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned") set
> -funsigned-char globally, which changed the result of the naked 'char'
> load in str2hashbuf():
> 
> 	val = msg[i] + (val << 8);
> 
> A name byte >= 0x80 used to sign-extend and now zero-extends, so
> ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash() computes a different hash pair for every name
> containing one.  The pair is written into the dx leaf when the entry is
> created, so an index built by an older kernel no longer matches and
> ocfs2_dx_dir_search() returns -ENOENT for a name that readdir still
> lists.
> 
> Search with the current unsigned hash and, on a miss, retry with the
> legacy signed one, as ext4 does in commit f3bbac32475b2 ("ext4: deal
> with legacy signed xattr name hash values").  New entries are always
> indexed under the unsigned hash.  Skip the retry when the two hashes
> are equal, so that a miss on an ASCII name does not walk the index
> twice.
> 
> The retry costs a second walk of the dx tree, so a negative lookup of a
> name containing a byte >= 0x80 does twice the work.  That is bounded and
> worth it, and directories whose dx root is still inline pay nothing
> extra, since there the retry only rescans the root block that is already
> loaded.  Nothing retires it at runtime: a legacy entry keeps its legacy
> hash, because neither deleting nor updating an entry rewrites the dx
> hash, and the only code that rehashes existing dirents is
> ocfs2_expand_inline_dir() on the inline to extent conversion.
> Rebuilding the index offline is what removes the cost for good.
> 
> Also spell out the signedness in str2hashbuf() instead of leaving the
> current hash to -funsigned-char, as commit 854f0912f813 ("ext4: make
> xattr char unsignedness in hash explicit") did, so that both variants
> stay correct if this is backported to a kernel without the flag.
> 
> Reported-by: Anderson Ferneda <anderson.ferneda@braza.com.br>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/CP5P284MB2780AC2C3C2AB2CF2B6CB7AFBE942@CP5P284MB2780.BRAP284.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/
> Exposed-by: 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 55c4a305a282..3f159a20a248 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ static void TEA_transform(__u32 buf[4], __u32 const in[])
>  	buf[1] += b1;
>  }
>  
> -static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num)
> +static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num,
> +			bool legacy_signed)
>  {
>  	__u32	pad, val;
>  	int	i;
> @@ -235,7 +236,10 @@ static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num)
>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>  		if ((i % 4) == 0)
>  			val = pad;
> -		val = msg[i] + (val << 8);
> +		if (legacy_signed)
> +			val = (signed char)msg[i] + (val << 8);
> +		else
> +			val = (unsigned char)msg[i] + (val << 8);
>  		if ((i % 4) == 3) {
>  			*buf++ = val;
>  			val = pad;
> @@ -248,8 +252,9 @@ static void str2hashbuf(const char *msg, int len, __u32 *buf, int num)
>  		*buf++ = pad;
>  }
>  
> -static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
> -				   struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo)
> +static void __ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name,
> +				     int len, struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo,
> +				     bool legacy_signed)
>  {
>  	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb);
>  	const char	*p;
> @@ -279,7 +284,7 @@ static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
>  
>  	p = name;
>  	while (len > 0) {
> -		str2hashbuf(p, len, in, 4);
> +		str2hashbuf(p, len, in, 4, legacy_signed);
>  		TEA_transform(buf, in);
>  		len -= 16;
>  		p += 16;
> @@ -290,6 +295,19 @@ static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
>  	hinfo->minor_hash = buf[1];
>  }
>  
> +static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(struct inode *dir, const char *name, int len,
> +				   struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo)
> +{
> +	__ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, len, hinfo, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash_signed(struct inode *dir, const char *name,
> +					  int len,
> +					  struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo *hinfo)
> +{
> +	__ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, len, hinfo, true);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * bh passed here can be an inode block or a dir data block, depending
>   * on the inode inline data flag.
> @@ -1021,10 +1039,10 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup(struct inode *inode,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
> -			       struct inode *dir,
> -			       struct ocfs2_dx_root_block *dx_root,
> -			       struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *res)
> +static int __ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
> +				 struct inode *dir,
> +				 struct ocfs2_dx_root_block *dx_root,
> +				 struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *res)
>  {
>  	int ret, i, found;
>  	u64 phys;
> @@ -1037,8 +1055,6 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
>  	struct ocfs2_extent_list *dr_el;
>  	struct ocfs2_dx_entry_list *entry_list;
>  
> -	ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, namelen, &res->dl_hinfo);
> -
>  	if (ocfs2_dx_root_inline(dx_root)) {
>  		entry_list = &dx_root->dr_entries;
>  		goto search;
> @@ -1135,6 +1151,44 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int ocfs2_dx_dir_search(const char *name, int namelen,
> +			       struct inode *dir,
> +			       struct ocfs2_dx_root_block *dx_root,
> +			       struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *res)
> +{
> +	struct ocfs2_dx_hinfo legacy;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash(dir, name, namelen, &res->dl_hinfo);
> +
> +	ret = __ocfs2_dx_dir_search(name, namelen, dir, dx_root, res);
> +	if (ret != -ENOENT)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Nothing under the current hash.  The entry may have been indexed by
> +	 * an older kernel, which sign-extended the name bytes when hashing.
> +	 * New entries are always indexed under the unsigned hash, so only fall
> +	 * back to the legacy signed one when it can actually differ: an ASCII
> +	 * name hashes the same either way, and a genuine miss on one should
> +	 * not have to walk the index twice.
> +	 */
> +	ocfs2_dx_dir_name_hash_signed(dir, name, namelen, &legacy);
> +	if (legacy.major_hash == res->dl_hinfo.major_hash &&
> +	    legacy.minor_hash == res->dl_hinfo.minor_hash)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	res->dl_hinfo = legacy;
> +
> +	ret = __ocfs2_dx_dir_search(name, namelen, dir, dx_root, res);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	pr_warn_once("ocfs2: directory index with signed name hash\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int ocfs2_find_entry_dx(const char *name, int namelen,
>  			       struct inode *dir,
>  			       struct ocfs2_dir_lookup_result *lookup)
> -- 
> 2.39.3
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed xattr name hash values
  2026-10-08 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed xattr " Joseph Qi
@ 2026-10-09  3:18   ` Heming Zhao
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heming Zhao @ 2026-10-09  3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joseph Qi
  Cc: Andrew Morton, Anderson Ferneda, Mark Fasheh, Joel Becker,
	ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel

On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 08:27:43PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> Commit 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned") set
> -funsigned-char globally, which changed the result of the naked 'char'
> load in ocfs2_xattr_name_hash():
> 
> 	hash = (hash << OCFS2_HASH_SHIFT) ^
> 	       (hash >> (8*sizeof(hash) - OCFS2_HASH_SHIFT)) ^
> 	       *name++;
> 
> A name byte >= 0x80 used to sign-extend and now zero-extends, so the
> hash no longer matches the xe_name_hash an older kernel stored.  An
> indexed xattr tree is searched by that hash alone, and both the bucket
> binary search and the entry scan within it stop as soon as the wanted
> hash falls below an entry's, so the entry is never reached: getxattr,
> setxattr and removexattr return -ENODATA for a name that listxattr
> still lists.
> 
> Search with the current unsigned hash and, on a miss, retry with the
> legacy signed one, as ext4 does in commit f3bbac32475b2 ("ext4: deal
> with legacy signed xattr name hash values").  New entries are always
> stored under the unsigned hash.  Skip the retry when the two hashes are
> equal, so that a miss on an ASCII name does not walk the tree twice.
> 
> A miss is not empty handed: ocfs2_xattr_bucket_find() leaves xs->bucket
> holding the bucket a new entry would go into.  So after a double miss
> drop it and search once more with the unsigned hash, otherwise a new
> entry would be placed by its legacy hash and stored under its unsigned
> one, breaking the ordering the search relies on.
> 
> Only indexed trees are affected; inline xattrs and non-indexed xattr
> blocks compare names with memcmp and never look at the hash.
> 
> Also spell out the signedness instead of leaving the current hash to
> -funsigned-char, as commit 854f0912f813 ("ext4: make xattr char
> unsignedness in hash explicit") did, so that both variants stay correct
> if this is backported to a kernel without the flag.
> 
> Exposed-by: 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

I agree with Sashiko review comment, the ocfs2_check_xattr_bucket_collision()
also requires the same fix.

Thanks,
Heming
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> index a428fe908116..0834883ae971 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> @@ -601,9 +601,10 @@ static inline const char *ocfs2_xattr_prefix(int name_index)
>  	return handler ? xattr_prefix(handler) : NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static u32 ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(struct inode *inode,
> -				 const char *name,
> -				 int name_len)
> +static u32 __ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(struct inode *inode,
> +				   const char *name,
> +				   int name_len,
> +				   bool legacy_signed)
>  {
>  	/* Get hash value of uuid from super block */
>  	u32 hash = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb)->uuid_hash;
> @@ -612,13 +613,30 @@ static u32 ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(struct inode *inode,
>  	/* hash extended attribute name */
>  	for (i = 0; i < name_len; i++) {
>  		hash = (hash << OCFS2_HASH_SHIFT) ^
> -		       (hash >> (8*sizeof(hash) - OCFS2_HASH_SHIFT)) ^
> -		       *name++;
> +		       (hash >> (8*sizeof(hash) - OCFS2_HASH_SHIFT));
> +		if (legacy_signed)
> +			hash ^= (signed char)name[i];
> +		else
> +			hash ^= (unsigned char)name[i];
>  	}
>  
>  	return hash;
>  }
>  
> +static u32 ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(struct inode *inode,
> +				 const char *name,
> +				 int name_len)
> +{
> +	return __ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, name_len, false);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 ocfs2_xattr_name_hash_signed(struct inode *inode,
> +					const char *name,
> +					int name_len)
> +{
> +	return __ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, name_len, true);
> +}
> +
>  static int ocfs2_xattr_entry_real_size(int name_len, size_t value_len)
>  {
>  	return namevalue_size(name_len, value_len) +
> @@ -4304,11 +4322,12 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_bucket_find(struct inode *inode,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(struct inode *inode,
> -					struct buffer_head *root_bh,
> -					int name_index,
> -					const char *name,
> -					struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs)
> +static int __ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(struct inode *inode,
> +					  struct buffer_head *root_bh,
> +					  int name_index,
> +					  const char *name,
> +					  u32 name_hash,
> +					  struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	struct ocfs2_xattr_block *xb =
> @@ -4317,7 +4336,6 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(struct inode *inode,
>  	struct ocfs2_extent_list *el = &xb_root->xt_list;
>  	u64 p_blkno = 0;
>  	u32 first_hash, num_clusters = 0;
> -	u32 name_hash = ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, strlen(name));
>  
>  	if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) == 0)
>  		return -ENODATA;
> @@ -4348,6 +4366,59 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(struct inode *inode,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(struct inode *inode,
> +					struct buffer_head *root_bh,
> +					int name_index,
> +					const char *name,
> +					struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs)
> +{
> +	u32 name_hash, legacy_hash;
> +	int name_len = strlen(name);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	name_hash = ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, name_len);
> +
> +	ret = __ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(inode, root_bh, name_index, name,
> +					     name_hash, xs);
> +	if (ret != -ENODATA)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Nothing under the current hash.  The entry may have been stored by
> +	 * an older kernel, which sign-extended the name bytes when hashing.
> +	 * Skip the retry when the two hashes are equal, so that a name made
> +	 * only of ASCII does not have to walk the tree twice.
> +	 */
> +	legacy_hash = ocfs2_xattr_name_hash_signed(inode, name, name_len);
> +	if (legacy_hash == name_hash)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * A miss still leaves xs->bucket holding the bucket a new entry would
> +	 * be inserted into, so drop it before searching again.
> +	 */
> +	ocfs2_xattr_bucket_relse(xs->bucket);
> +
> +	ret = __ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(inode, root_bh, name_index, name,
> +					     legacy_hash, xs);
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		pr_warn_once("ocfs2: xattr tree with signed name hash\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	if (ret != -ENODATA)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Not under either hash.  Restore the unsigned placement, since that
> +	 * is where a new entry is stored: leaving the bucket where the legacy
> +	 * hash put it would break the ordering the search relies on.
> +	 */
> +	ocfs2_xattr_bucket_relse(xs->bucket);
> +
> +	return __ocfs2_xattr_index_block_find(inode, root_bh, name_index, name,
> +					      name_hash, xs);
> +}
> +
>  static int ocfs2_iterate_xattr_buckets(struct inode *inode,
>  				       u64 blkno,
>  				       u32 clusters,
> -- 
> 2.39.3
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-09  3:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-08 12:27 [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index name hash values Joseph Qi
2026-10-08 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed xattr " Joseph Qi
2026-10-09  3:18   ` Heming Zhao
2026-10-08 17:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index " Andrew Morton
2026-10-09  2:58 ` Heming Zhao

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®