mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] neighbour: Move the netdev_put() out of RCU callback
@ 2026-10-09  9:19 Zqiang
  2026-10-09 21:26 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zqiang @ 2026-10-09  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, kuniyu
  Cc: qiang.zhang, netdev, linux-kernel

For builts with CONFIG_NET_DEV_REFCNT_TRACKER=y kernels, netdev_put()
records the caller's stack trace via ref_tracker_free() for debugging
reference leaks. however, the netdev_put() is within pneigh_destroy()
RCU callback, this recorded stack is uninformative, it does not reveal
which code path initiated the deletion.

This commit therefore move netdev_put() from the RCU callback into the
caller's process context, and replace call_rcu() with kfree_rcu().

Fixes: d539d8fbd8fc ("neighbour: Free pneigh_entry after RCU grace period.")
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
---
 net/core/neighbour.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 6ed8eb075146..4263689fc415 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -818,14 +818,6 @@ int pneigh_create(struct neigh_table *tbl,
 	return err;
 }
 
-static void pneigh_destroy(struct rcu_head *rcu)
-{
-	struct pneigh_entry *n = container_of(rcu, struct pneigh_entry, rcu);
-
-	netdev_put(n->dev, &n->dev_tracker);
-	kfree(n);
-}
-
 int pneigh_delete(struct neigh_table *tbl, const void *pkey,
 		  struct net_device *dev)
 {
@@ -849,7 +841,8 @@ int pneigh_delete(struct neigh_table *tbl, const void *pkey,
 			if (tbl->pdestructor)
 				tbl->pdestructor(n);
 
-			call_rcu(&n->rcu, pneigh_destroy);
+			netdev_put(n->dev, &n->dev_tracker);
+			kfree_rcu(n, rcu);
 			return 0;
 		}
 	}
@@ -891,7 +884,8 @@ static void pneigh_ifdown(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct net_device *dev,
 		if (tbl->pdestructor)
 			tbl->pdestructor(n);
 
-		call_rcu(&n->rcu, pneigh_destroy);
+		netdev_put(n->dev, &n->dev_tracker);
+		kfree_rcu(n, rcu);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] neighbour: Move the netdev_put() out of RCU callback
  2026-10-09  9:19 [PATCH] neighbour: Move the netdev_put() out of RCU callback Zqiang
@ 2026-10-09 21:26 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima @ 2026-10-09 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zqiang; +Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, netdev, linux-kernel

On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 2:19 AM Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> For builts with CONFIG_NET_DEV_REFCNT_TRACKER=y kernels, netdev_put()
> records the caller's stack trace via ref_tracker_free() for debugging
> reference leaks. however, the netdev_put() is within pneigh_destroy()
> RCU callback, this recorded stack is uninformative, it does not reveal
> which code path initiated the deletion.

Have you seen pneigh double-free ?  What motivates this change ?


>
> This commit therefore move netdev_put() from the RCU callback into the
> caller's process context, and replace call_rcu() with kfree_rcu().
>
> Fixes: d539d8fbd8fc ("neighbour: Free pneigh_entry after RCU grace period.")

Please elaborate why your change is safe in the commit message
and remove the tag.


> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>

nit: full name

> ---
>  net/core/neighbour.c | 14 ++++----------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
> index 6ed8eb075146..4263689fc415 100644
> --- a/net/core/neighbour.c
> +++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
> @@ -818,14 +818,6 @@ int pneigh_create(struct neigh_table *tbl,
>         return err;
>  }
>
> -static void pneigh_destroy(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> -{
> -       struct pneigh_entry *n = container_of(rcu, struct pneigh_entry, rcu);
> -
> -       netdev_put(n->dev, &n->dev_tracker);
> -       kfree(n);
> -}
> -
>  int pneigh_delete(struct neigh_table *tbl, const void *pkey,
>                   struct net_device *dev)
>  {
> @@ -849,7 +841,8 @@ int pneigh_delete(struct neigh_table *tbl, const void *pkey,
>                         if (tbl->pdestructor)
>                                 tbl->pdestructor(n);
>
> -                       call_rcu(&n->rcu, pneigh_destroy);
> +                       netdev_put(n->dev, &n->dev_tracker);
> +                       kfree_rcu(n, rcu);
>                         return 0;
>                 }
>         }
> @@ -891,7 +884,8 @@ static void pneigh_ifdown(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct net_device *dev,
>                 if (tbl->pdestructor)
>                         tbl->pdestructor(n);
>
> -               call_rcu(&n->rcu, pneigh_destroy);
> +               netdev_put(n->dev, &n->dev_tracker);
> +               kfree_rcu(n, rcu);
>         }
>  }
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-09 21:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-09  9:19 [PATCH] neighbour: Move the netdev_put() out of RCU callback Zqiang
2026-10-09 21:26 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®