mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Jie Deng <dengjie03@kylinos.cn>
Cc: mathias.nyman@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Add XHCI_TT_SOFT_RETRY quirk for transaction errors on TT devices
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 07:52:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261010075221.409a5353.michal.pecio@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010032518.2040608-1-dengjie03@kylinos.cn>

On Sat, 10 Oct 2026 11:25:18 +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
> Low-speed devices behind a high-speed hub on some xHCI controllers stop
> working after repeated lsusb -v: a transient USB transaction error on a
> bulk/interrupt endpoint is followed by a hard reset recovery where every
> command completes successfully (Reset EP with TSP=0 and Set TR Deq both
> return COMP_SUCCESS), but the first new split transaction issued after
> the restart fails again.  After two such cycles the hub reports a port
> connection change and the device drops off.

There are no bulk/interrupt endopints. Which one?
(I tried and lsusb -v does seem to trigger some interrupt transfers).

The patch seems LLM-generated.
Are you sure it's a HW problem and not an LLM problem?

> The affected silicon does not honor the xHCI spec (4.6.8) requirement
> that a Reset Endpoint command with TSP=0 "reset any USB2 split
> transaction state associated with the endpoint": the stale split state
> survives the reset, so the next split transaction carries the old
> transaction's identity and can never match the hub TT state, cleared
> or not.  The soft reset path (TSP=1), which per the spec maintains the
> split transaction state and retries the last transaction on the next
> doorbell, recovers these transient errors on the first retry.
> 
> Add a XHCI_TT_SOFT_RETRY quirk: when set, bulk/interrupt endpoints
> behind a TT hub may use the existing soft retry machinery to retry a
> USB Transaction Error (completion code 4) in place instead of going
> through the hard reset path.  Platforms without the quirk keep the
> exact previous behavior.  Isochronous and control endpoints never
> enter this function, and the existing MAX_SOFT_RETRY bound still falls
> back to the hard reset path for persistent errors.

Sounds like you may need Configure Endpoint recovery if you ever run
out of retries in any case other than disconnection.

> The quirk is meant to be set by platform code for controllers with
> this silicon bug; no in-tree platform code sets it yet.

Is support for this HW coming upstream anytime soon?
Not sure if we take fixes for out-of-tree issues.

> On the affected controller every error reports comp code 4 (USB
> Transaction Error), tt_info 0x301 and err_count 1, i.e. each in-place
> retry succeeds immediately and the fallback is never taken.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jie Deng <dengjie03@kylinos.cn>

Suspecting missing Assisted-by.

Regards,
Michal

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-10  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-10  3:25 Jie Deng
2026-10-10  5:52 ` Michal Pecio [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261010075221.409a5353.michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=dengjie03@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®